Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 3/2024

30-04-2024 | Infection of the Genital Organs | Original Research Article

Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study

Authors: Munaza Riaz, Jingchuan Guo, Steven M. Smith, Eric A. Dietrich, David E. Winchester, Haesuk Park

Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The American Heart Association recommended sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, little is known about their real-world in-class comparative safety in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of SGLT2i in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome among patients with HFpEF.

Methods

This cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (2012–2020) included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of HFpEF who initiated SGLT2i therapy. Three pairwise comparison groups were established: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of UTI or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome in each cohort.

Results

The risk of the composite outcome did not significantly differ between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36–1.14) or between empagliflozin and canagliflozin (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77–2.05). Similarly, there was no evidence of difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in this risk (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.48–1.21). The results of analyses separately assessing UTI or genital infection were similar.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI or genital infection among patients with HFpEF who initiated canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Storgaard H, Gluud LL, Bennett C, et al. Benefits and harms of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11): e0166125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Storgaard H, Gluud LL, Bennett C, et al. Benefits and harms of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11): e0166125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Riaz M, Smith SM, Dietrich EA, Winchester DE, Guo J, Park H. Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Pharmacotherapy. 2023;43(10):1024–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2853. Riaz M, Smith SM, Dietrich EA, Winchester DE, Guo J, Park H. Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Pharmacotherapy. 2023;43(10):1024–1031. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​phar.​2853.
28.
go back to reference Rayens E, Rayens MNK. Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with fungal infection risk, United States, 2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(10):1955–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rayens E, Rayens MNK. Demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with fungal infection risk, United States, 2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28(10):1955–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study
Authors
Munaza Riaz
Jingchuan Guo
Steven M. Smith
Eric A. Dietrich
David E. Winchester
Haesuk Park
Publication date
30-04-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Electronic ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00648-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 3/2024 Go to the issue