Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Innovations in quality

Impact of patient questionnaires on completeness of clinical information and identification of causes of pain during outpatient abdominopelvic CT interpretation

Authors: Ankur M. Doshi, Chenchan Huang, Luke Ginocchio, Krishna Shanbhogue, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of questionnaires completed by patients at the time of abdominopelvic CT performed for abdominal pain on the completeness of clinical information and the identification of potential causes of pain, compared with order requisitions alone.

Methods

100 outpatient CT examinations performed for the evaluation of abdominal pain were retrospectively reviewed. The specificity of the location of pain was compared between the order requisition and patient questionnaire. An abdominal imaging fellow (Reader 1) and abdominal radiologist (Reader 2) reviewed the examinations independently in two sessions 6 weeks apart (one with only the order requisition and one also with the questionnaire). Readers recorded identified causes of pain and rated their confidence in interpretation (1–5 scale; least to greatest confidence).

Results

In 30% of patients, the questionnaire provided a more specific location for pain. Among these, the pain was localized to a specific quadrant in 40%. With having access to the questionnaire, both readers identified additional causes for pain not identified in session 1 (Reader 1, 8.6% [7/81]; Reader 2 5.3% [4/75]). Additional identified causes of pain included diverticulitis, cystitis, peritoneal implants, epiploic appendagitis, osseous metastatic disease, umbilical hernia, gastritis, and SMA syndrome. Confidence in interpretation was significantly greater using the questionnaire for both readers (Reader 1: 4.8 ± 0.6 vs. 4.0 ± 0.5; Reader 2: 4.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.7 ± 0.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patient questionnaires provide additional relevant clinical history, increased diagnostic yield, and improve radiologists’ confidence. Radiology practices are encouraged to implement questionnaires and make these readily available to radiologists at the time of interpretation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schreiber MH (1963) The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. Jama 185:399–401CrossRefPubMed Schreiber MH (1963) The clinical history as a factor in roentgenogram interpretation. Jama 185:399–401CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mullins ME, Lev MH, Schellingerhout D, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (2002) Influence of availability of clinical history on detection of early stroke using unenhanced CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):223–228. doi:10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790223 CrossRefPubMed Mullins ME, Lev MH, Schellingerhout D, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (2002) Influence of availability of clinical history on detection of early stroke using unenhanced CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(1):223–228. doi:10.​2214/​ajr.​179.​1.​1790223 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference CMS. ICD-9-CM coding for diagnostic tests. https://www.cms. gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/AB01144.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2017 CMS. ICD-9-CM coding for diagnostic tests. https://​www.​cms. gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/AB01144.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
9.
go back to reference Hawkins CM, Anton CG, Bankes WM, et al. (2014) Improving the availability of clinical history accompanying radiographic examinations in a large pediatric radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(4):790–796. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11273 CrossRefPubMed Hawkins CM, Anton CG, Bankes WM, et al. (2014) Improving the availability of clinical history accompanying radiographic examinations in a large pediatric radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(4):790–796. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​13.​11273 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, et al. (2016) Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol 208(4):1–11 Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, et al. (2016) Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol 208(4):1–11
11.
go back to reference Doubilet P, Herman PG (1981) Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. Am J Roentgenol 137(5):1055–1058CrossRef Doubilet P, Herman PG (1981) Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. Am J Roentgenol 137(5):1055–1058CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Berbaum KS, El-Khoury G, Franken E Jr, et al. (1988) Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology 168(2):507–511CrossRefPubMed Berbaum KS, El-Khoury G, Franken E Jr, et al. (1988) Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology 168(2):507–511CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Good B, Cooperstein L, DeMarino G, et al. (1990) Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(4):709–712CrossRefPubMed Good B, Cooperstein L, DeMarino G, et al. (1990) Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(4):709–712CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Babcook CJ, Norman GR, Coblentz CL (1993) Effect of clinical history on the interpretation of chest radiographs in childhood bronchiolitis. Investig Radiol 28(3):214–217CrossRef Babcook CJ, Norman GR, Coblentz CL (1993) Effect of clinical history on the interpretation of chest radiographs in childhood bronchiolitis. Investig Radiol 28(3):214–217CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eldevik O, Dugstad G, Orrison W, Haughton V (1982) The effect of clinical bias on the interpretation of myelography and spinal computed tomography. Radiology 145(1):85–89CrossRefPubMed Eldevik O, Dugstad G, Orrison W, Haughton V (1982) The effect of clinical bias on the interpretation of myelography and spinal computed tomography. Radiology 145(1):85–89CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Loy CT, Irwig L (2004) Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. Jama 292(13):1602–1609CrossRefPubMed Loy CT, Irwig L (2004) Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. Jama 292(13):1602–1609CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of patient questionnaires on completeness of clinical information and identification of causes of pain during outpatient abdominopelvic CT interpretation
Authors
Ankur M. Doshi
Chenchan Huang
Luke Ginocchio
Krishna Shanbhogue
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1202-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Abdominal Radiology 12/2017 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.