Published in:
01-12-2017
Distinguishing gastric anisakiasis from non-anisakiasis using unenhanced computed tomography
Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 12/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for distinguishing gastric anisakiasis from non-anisakiasis gastric conditions and the reproducibility of CT findings.
Methods
Fifty-six anisakiasis and 74 non-anisakiasis cases with gastric wall thickening on urgent observation using unenhanced CT were included. Using a κ analysis, two radiologists independently assessed the reproducibility of CT findings, including “circumferential gastric wall thickening,” “gastric wall thickening extending more than two segments,” “bulky and low-density gastric wall thickening,” “increase in peri-gastric fat density,” and “ascites.” An anisakiasis diagnostic score (ADS) was developed for this study and was used to quantitatively evaluate the CT findings. An anisakiasis diagnostic prediction (ADP) with an appropriate cutoff value was used to further evaluate the ADS. Two radiologists reassessed the findings in consensus to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CT findings, including the ADP and ADS area under the curve (AUC).
Results
Considering reproducibility, a substantial agreement (0.6 < κ < 0.8) was achieved for all findings except “circumferential gastric wall thickening” (κ = 0.499), whereas for diagnostic performance, all findings except ascites were significantly more frequent among the anisakiasis cases. “Bulky and low-density gastric wall thickening” had the highest sensitivity (98%), whereas “gastric wall thickening extending more than two segments” had the highest specificity (80%). The ADP sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 91%, 84%, and 87%, respectively. The AUC was 0.902 (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Unenhanced CT findings are useful for distinguishing anisakiasis from non-anisakiasis gastric conditions with sufficient reproducibility.