Top

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | ICSI | Review

Should rescue ICSI be re-evaluated considering the deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos in in-vitro fertilization cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Alessio Paffoni, Marco Reschini, Valerio Pisaturo, Cristina Guarneri, Simone Palini, Paola Viganò

Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Total fertilization failure represents a particularly frustrating condition for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. With the aim of reducing the occurrence of total fertilization failure, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become the first choice over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures although evidence of improved results is still debated and its use in couples without male factor infertility is not recommended. Among the strategies potentially useful to promote the use of conventional IVF, we herein call attention to the late rescue ICSI, which consists in performing ICSI after 18–24 h from conventional insemination on oocytes that show no signs of fertilization. This treatment has however been reported to be associated with a low success rate until recent observations that embryos derived from late rescue ICSI may be transferred after cryopreservation in a frozen-thawed cycle with improved results. The aim of the present study was to assess whether frozen embryos deriving from rescue ICSI performed about 24 h after conventional IVF may represent a valuable option for couples experiencing fertilization failure.

Methods

A systematic review on the efficacy of late rescue ICSI was performed consulting PUBMED and EMBASE.

Results

Including twenty-two original studies, we showed that clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate obtainable with fresh embryo transfers after rescue ICSI are not satisfactory being equal to 10 and 5%, respectively. The transfer of cryopreserved rescue ICSI embryos seems to offer a substantial improvement of success rates, with pregnancy rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate equal to 36 and 18%, respectively. Coupling rescue ICSI with frozen embryo transfer may ameliorate the clinical pregnancy rate for embryo transfer with an Odds Ratio = 4.7 (95% CI:2.6–8.6).

Conclusion

Results of the present review support the idea that r-ICSI coupled with frozen embryo transfer may overcome most of the technical and biological issues associated with fresh transfer after late r-ICSI, thus possibly representing an efficient procedure for couples experiencing fertilization failure following conventional IVF cycles.

Trial registration

Prospero registration ID: CRD42021239026.

Available only for authorised users

Rubino P, Viganò P, Luddi A, Piomboni P. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Hum Reprod Update. 2016:dmv050. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv050.

Haddad M, Stewart J, Xie P, Cheung S, Trout A, Keating D, et al. Thoughts on the popularity of ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01987-0.

Zagadailov P, Seifer DB, Shan H, Zarek SM, Hsu AL. Do state insurance mandates alter ICSI utilization? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020;18(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00589-w.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313(3):255–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17985.CrossRefPubMed

Combelles CM, Morozumi K, Yanagimachi R, Zhu L, Fox JH, Racowsky C. Diagnosing cellular defects in an unexplained case of total fertilization failure. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(7):1666–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq064.CrossRefPubMed

Abbas AM, Hussein RS, Elsenity MA, Samaha II, El Etriby KA, Abd El-Ghany MF, et al. Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(6):101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101706.CrossRefPubMed

Dang VQ, Vuong LN, Luu TM, Pham TD, Ho TM, Ha AN, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1554–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00535-3.CrossRefPubMed

Johnson LN, Sasson IE, Sammel MD, Dokras A. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection improve the fertilization rate and decrease the total fertilization failure rate in couples with well-defined unexplained infertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):704–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.038.CrossRefPubMed

Haas J, Miller TE, Nahum R, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, Zilberberg E, et al. The role of ICSI vs conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.026.

11.

Beck-Fruchter R, Lavee M, Weiss A, Geslevich Y, Shalev E. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):690–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.004.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chen C, Kattera S. Rescue ICSI of oocytes that failed to extrude the second polar body 6 h post-insemination in conventional IVF. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2118–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg325.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Tesarik J. Associate editor's comment on 'Rescue ICSI of oocytes that failed to extrude the second polar body 6 h post-insemination in conventional IVF' by Chen and Kattera. Rescue ICSI revisited. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(10):2122–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg425.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ming L, Liu P, Qiao J, Lian Y, Zheng X, Ren X, et al. Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24(5):527–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Sermondade N, Hugues JN, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Poncelet C, Benzacken B, Lévy R, et al. Should all embryos from day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection be transferred during frozen-thawed cycles? Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):1157–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

16.

World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision). 11th ed. World Health Organization; 2018. Retrieved from from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en.

17.

Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.

18.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014; URL http://www.R-project.org/

19.

Lundin K, Sjögren A, Hamberger L. Reinsemination of one-day-old oocytes by use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(1):118–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58397-6.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Morton PC, Yoder CS, Tucker MJ, Wright G, Brockman WD, Kort HI. Reinsemination by intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1-day-old oocytes after complete conventional fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(3):488–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00223-9.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bussen S, Mulfinger L, Sütterlin M, Schleyer M, Kress W, Steck T. Dizygotic twin pregnancy after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1 day old unfertilized oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2560–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.11.2560.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Yuzpe AA, Liu Z, Fluker MR. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-salvaging in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles after total or near-total fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1115–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00522-7.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Park; K.S., Song, H.B., Chun, S.S. Late fertilization of unfertilized human oocytes in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: conventional insemination versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000; doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009409100941.

24.

Kuczyński W, Dhont M, Grygoruk C, Pietrewicz P, Redzko S, Szamatowicz M. Rescue ICSI of unfertilized oocytes after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2423–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9.2423.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Chian RC, Lapensée L, Phillips S, Tan SL. Observation of pronuclei may not be an absolute indicator for fertilization in rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection oocytes. Reprod Med Biol. 2003;2(2):83–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-5781.2003.00020.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lombardi E, Tiverón M, Inza R, Valcárcel A, Young E, Bisioli C. Live birth and normal 1-year follow-up of a baby born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos from rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1-day-old oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):646–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00996-8.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Ruiz A, Navarro J, Remohí J, Pellicer A, et al. Embryonic chromosomal abnormalities obtained after rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection of 1-day-old unfertilized oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(2):55–7. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jarg.0000025939.26834.93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Amarin ZO, Obeidat BR, Rouzi AA, Jallad MF, Khader YS. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection after total conventional in-vitro fertilization failure. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:411–5.PubMed

29.

DeUgarte CM, Li M, Jordan B, Hill D, DeCherney A, Surrey M. Rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis in combination can result in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(1):200–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.021.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Esfandiari N, Claessens EA, Burjaq H, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. Ongoing twin pregnancy after rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection of unfertilized abnormal oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):199.e5–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1299.CrossRef

31.

Shalom-paz E, Alshalati J, Shehata F, Jimenez L, Son WY, Holzer H, et al. Clinical and economic analysis of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(12):993–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2011.579655.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Xiong S, Han W, Liu JX, Zhang XD, Liu WW, Liu H, et al. Effects of cumulus cells removal after 6 h co-incubation of gametes on the outcomes of human IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(12):1205–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9630-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Zhu L, Ren X, Wu L, Hu J, Li Y, Zhang H, et al. Rescue ICSI: choose the optimal rescue window before oocyte aging. Reprod Contracept. 2011;22(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-7844(12)60004-2.CrossRef

34.

Singh N, Malhotra N, Shende U, Tiwari A. Successful live birth after rescue ICSI following failed fertilization. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):77–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.112388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Moon JH, Henderson S, Garcia-Cerrudo E, Mahfoudh A, Reinblatt S, Son WY. Successful live birth after transfer of blastocyst and frozen blastocyst from rescue ICSI with application of polarized light microscopy for spindle examination on unfertilized eggs. J Ovarian Res. 2015;8(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-015-0150-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Sachdev NM, Grifo JA, Licciardi F. Delayed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) show increased aneuploidy rates but can lead to live births with single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(11):1501–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0743-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Li M, Li Q, Wang Y, Huang J, Liu P. Blastocyst cryopreservation and cryopreservation-warming transfer is an effective embryo transfer strategy for day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87693-y.

38.

ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):494–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015.CrossRef

39.

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.033.

40.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):920–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826af61a.CrossRefPubMed

41.

van Rumste MM, Evers JL, Farquhar CM. Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation in patients with non-male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001301.

42.

Kilani SS, Cooke S, Kan AK, Chapman MG. Do age and extended culture affect the architecture of the zona pellucida of human oocytes and embryos? Zygote. 2006;14(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199406003625.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Viganò P, Alteri A, Busnelli A, Vanni VS, Somigliana E. Frozen IVF cycles to circumvent the hormonal storm on endometrium. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(4):296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2020.01.009.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw038.

45.

ESHRE Working group on Time-lapse technology, Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa008.

Title: Should rescue ICSI be re-evaluated considering the deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos in in-vitro fertilization cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Alessio Paffoni
Marco Reschini
Valerio Pisaturo
Cristina Guarneri
Simone Palini
Paola Viganò
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: ICSI
Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7827
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00784-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Should rescue ICSI be re-evaluated considering the deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos in in-vitro fertilization cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

microRNA-194 is increased in polycystic ovary syndrome granulosa cell and induce KGN cells apoptosis by direct targeting heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor

Predictive value of live birth rate based on different intrauterine adhesion evaluation systems following TCRA

Thin endometrium is associated with the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study of 9,266 singleton births

High-coverage targeted lipidomics revealed dramatic lipid compositional changes in asthenozoospermic spermatozoa and inverse correlation of ganglioside GM3 with sperm motility

Ectopic pregnancy: a single-center experience over ten years

The altered immunological status of children conceived by assisted reproductive technology