Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Research

How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study

Authors: Xiaofei He, PhD, MPH, Karen E. Schifferdecker, PhD, MPH, Elissa M. Ozanne, PhD, Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD, Steven Woloshin, MD, MS, Lisa M. Schwartz, MD, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Decades of persuasive messages have reinforced the importance of traditional screening mammography at regular intervals. A potential new paradigm, risk-based screening, adjusts mammography frequency based on a woman’s estimated breast cancer risk in order to maximize mortality reduction while minimizing false positives and overdiagnosis. Women’s views of risk-based screening are unknown.

Objective

To explore women’s views and personal acceptability of a potential risk-based mammography screening paradigm.

Design

Four semi-structured focus group discussions about screening mammography and surveys before provision of information about risk-based screening. We analyzed coded focus group transcripts using a mixed deductive (content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach.

Participants

Convenience sample of 29 women (40–74 years old) with no personal history of breast cancer recruited by print and online media in New Hampshire and Vermont.

Results

Twenty-seven out of 29 women reported having undergone mammography screening. All participants were white and most were highly educated. Some women accepted the idea that early cancer detection with traditional screening was beneficial—although many also reported hearing inconsistent recommendations from clinicians and mixed messages from media reports about mammography. Some women were familiar with a risk-based screening paradigm (primarily related to cervical cancer, n = 8) and thought matching screening mammography frequency to personal risk made sense (n = 8). Personal acceptability of risk-based screening was mixed. Some believed risk-based screening could reduce the harms of false positives and overdiagnosis (n = 7). Others thought screening less often might result in missing a dangerous diagnosis (n = 14). Many (n = 18) expressed concerns about the feasibility of risk-based screening and questioned whether breast cancer risk estimates could be accurate. Some suspected that risk-based mammography was motivated by a desire to save money (n = 6).

Conclusion

Some women thought risk-based screening made sense. Willingness to abandon traditional screening for the new paradigm was mixed. Broad acceptability of risk-based screening will require clearer communication about its rationale and feasibility and consistent messages from the health care team.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
15.
go back to reference Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2016). Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. Available at www.dedoose.com. Accessed February 6, 2018. Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2016). Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. Available at www.​dedoose.​com. Accessed February 6, 2018.
16.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications Inc.; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications Inc.; 2008.
31.
go back to reference Toledo-Chávarri A, Rué M, Codern-Bové N, Carles-Lavila M, Perestelo-Pérez L, Pérez-Lacasta MJ, et al. A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(3):n/a. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12660.CrossRef Toledo-Chávarri A, Rué M, Codern-Bové N, Carles-Lavila M, Perestelo-Pérez L, Pérez-Lacasta MJ, et al. A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(3):n/a. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ecc.​12660.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press; 1962. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press; 1962.
Metadata
Title
How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study
Authors
Xiaofei He, PhD, MPH
Karen E. Schifferdecker, PhD, MPH
Elissa M. Ozanne, PhD
Anna N. A. Tosteson, ScD
Steven Woloshin, MD, MS
Lisa M. Schwartz, MD, MS
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4601-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.