Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: a web-based survey of primary care physicians

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of screening mammography (SM) for women younger than 50 and older than 74 years is debated in the clinical research community, among health care providers, and by the American public. This study explored primary care physicians' (PCPs) perceptions of the influence of clinical practice guidelines for SM; the recommendations for SM in response to hypothetical case scenarios; and the factors associated with perceived SM effectiveness and recommendations in the US from June to December 2009 before the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently revised guidelines.

Methods

A nationally representative sample of 11,922 PCPs was surveyed using a web-based questionnaire. The response rate was 5.7% (684); (41%) 271 family physicians (FP), (36%) 232 general internal medicine physicians (IM), (23%) 150 obstetrician-gynaecologists (OBG), and (0.2%) 31 others. Cross-sectional analysis examined PCPs perceived effectiveness of SM, and recommendation for SM in response to hypothetical case scenarios. PCPs responses were measured using 4-5 point adjectival scales. Differences in perceived effectiveness and recommendations for SM were examined after adjusting for PCPs specialty, race/ethnicity, and the US region.

Results

Compared to IM and FP, OBG considered SM more effective in reducing breast cancer mortality among women aged 40-49 years (p = 0.003). Physicians consistently recommended mammography to women aged 50-69 years with no differences by specialty (p = 0.11). However, 94% of OBG "always recommended" SM to younger and 86% of older women compared to 81% and 67% for IM and 84% and 59% for FP respectively (p = < .001). In ordinal regression analysis, OBG specialty was a significant predictor for perceived higher SM effectiveness and recommendations for younger and older women. In evaluating hypothetical scenarios, overall PCPs would recommend SM for the 80 year woman with CHF with a significant variation by specialty (38% of OBG, 18% of FP, 17% of IM; p = < .001).

Conclusions

A majority of physicians, especially OBG, favour aggressive breast cancer screening for women from 40 through 79 years of age, including women with short life expectancy. Policy interventions should focus on educating providers to provide tailored recommendations for mammography based on individualized cancer risk, health status, and preferences.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, et al: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2009, 59 (4): 225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006. Jemal A, et al: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2009, 59 (4): 225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006.
2.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Russell IT: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet. 1993, 342 (8883): 1317-1322. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N.CrossRef Grimshaw JM, Russell IT: Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet. 1993, 342 (8883): 1317-1322. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-N.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Woolf SH: The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 303 (2): 162. Woolf SH: The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 303 (2): 162.
4.
5.
go back to reference Barbieri RL: Access to screening mammography: Priceless. OBG Management. 22 (1). Barbieri RL: Access to screening mammography: Priceless. OBG Management. 22 (1).
6.
go back to reference Rich JS, Black WC: When should we stop screening?. Effective clinical practice: ECP. 3 (2): 78. Rich JS, Black WC: When should we stop screening?. Effective clinical practice: ECP. 3 (2): 78.
7.
go back to reference Raik BL, FGM , Fins JJ: Screening and cognitive impairment: ethics of forgoing mammography in older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004, 52 (3): 440-444. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52119.x.CrossRefPubMed Raik BL, FGM , Fins JJ: Screening and cognitive impairment: ethics of forgoing mammography in older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004, 52 (3): 440-444. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52119.x.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tudiver F, et al: Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting. Journal of Family Practice. 2001, 50 (8): 682-687.PubMed Tudiver F, et al: Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting. Journal of Family Practice. 2001, 50 (8): 682-687.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Zyzanski SJ, et al: Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. The Journal of family practice. 1994, 39 (2): 140.PubMed Zyzanski SJ, et al: Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. The Journal of family practice. 1994, 39 (2): 140.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Clasen CM, et al: A survey of physician beliefs and self-reported practices concerning screening for early detection of cancer. Social Science & Medicine. 1994, 39 (6): 841-849. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90046-9.CrossRef Clasen CM, et al: A survey of physician beliefs and self-reported practices concerning screening for early detection of cancer. Social Science & Medicine. 1994, 39 (6): 841-849. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90046-9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burns RB, et al: Variability in mammography use among older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1996, 44 (8). Burns RB, et al: Variability in mammography use among older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1996, 44 (8).
12.
go back to reference Andersen MR, Urban N: Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use?. Women & health. 1997, 26 (1): 29-10.1300/J013v26n01_03.CrossRef Andersen MR, Urban N: Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use?. Women & health. 1997, 26 (1): 29-10.1300/J013v26n01_03.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Herman CJ, Hoffman RM, Altobelli KK: Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico. Journal of community health. 1999, 24 (4): 253-267. 10.1023/A:1018790104934.CrossRefPubMed Herman CJ, Hoffman RM, Altobelli KK: Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico. Journal of community health. 1999, 24 (4): 253-267. 10.1023/A:1018790104934.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hong CS, et al: Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010, 304 (10): 1107-10.1001/jama.2010.1287.CrossRefPubMed Hong CS, et al: Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010, 304 (10): 1107-10.1001/jama.2010.1287.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pasko T, Smart DR: Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US2003. Amer Medical Assn. Pasko T, Smart DR: Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the US2003. Amer Medical Assn.
16.
go back to reference O'Malley AS, et al: Health center trends, 1994-2001: what do they portend for the federal growth initiative?. Health Affairs. 2005, 24 (2): 465-10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.465.CrossRefPubMed O'Malley AS, et al: Health center trends, 1994-2001: what do they portend for the federal growth initiative?. Health Affairs. 2005, 24 (2): 465-10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.465.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wallace AE, MacKenzie TA, Weeks WB: Women's primary care providers and breast cancer screening: Who's following the guidelines?. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006, 194 (3): 744-748. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.194.CrossRefPubMed Wallace AE, MacKenzie TA, Weeks WB: Women's primary care providers and breast cancer screening: Who's following the guidelines?. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006, 194 (3): 744-748. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.194.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN: Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education. 2003, 44 (4): 409-432. 10.1023/A:1024232915870.CrossRef Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN: Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education. 2003, 44 (4): 409-432. 10.1023/A:1024232915870.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jones C, Sheatsley P: Nonresponse bias for attitude questions. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1981, 45 (3): 359-10.1086/268670.CrossRef Jones C, Sheatsley P: Nonresponse bias for attitude questions. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1981, 45 (3): 359-10.1086/268670.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hutchison J, Tollefson N, Wigington H: Response bias in college freshmen's responses to mail surveys. Research in Higher Education. 1987, 26 (1): 99-106. 10.1007/BF00991936.CrossRef Hutchison J, Tollefson N, Wigington H: Response bias in college freshmen's responses to mail surveys. Research in Higher Education. 1987, 26 (1): 99-106. 10.1007/BF00991936.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tunis SR, et al: Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Annals of internal medicine. 1994, 120 (11): 956.CrossRefPubMed Tunis SR, et al: Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Annals of internal medicine. 1994, 120 (11): 956.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB: US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. JAMA. 303 (2): 172. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB: US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. JAMA. 303 (2): 172.
23.
go back to reference Mor V, Pacala JT, Rakowski W: Mammography for older women: who uses, who benefits?. Journal of gerontology. 1992, 47: 43.PubMed Mor V, Pacala JT, Rakowski W: Mammography for older women: who uses, who benefits?. Journal of gerontology. 1992, 47: 43.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Walter LC, Lindquist K, Covinsky KE: Relationship between health status and use of screening mammography and Papanicolaou smears among women older than 70 years of age. Annals of internal medicine. 2004, 140 (9): 681.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Lindquist K, Covinsky KE: Relationship between health status and use of screening mammography and Papanicolaou smears among women older than 70 years of age. Annals of internal medicine. 2004, 140 (9): 681.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J: Are guidelines following guidelines?: The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. Jama. 1999, 281 (20): 1900-10.1001/jama.281.20.1900.CrossRefPubMed Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J: Are guidelines following guidelines?: The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. Jama. 1999, 281 (20): 1900-10.1001/jama.281.20.1900.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pitkow JE, Kehoe CM: Emerging trends in the WWW user population. Communications of the ACM. 1996, 39 (6): 106-108. 10.1145/228503.228525.CrossRef Pitkow JE, Kehoe CM: Emerging trends in the WWW user population. Communications of the ACM. 1996, 39 (6): 106-108. 10.1145/228503.228525.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Braithwaite D, et al: Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?. Family Practice. 2003, 20 (5): 545-10.1093/fampra/cmg509.CrossRefPubMed Braithwaite D, et al: Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?. Family Practice. 2003, 20 (5): 545-10.1093/fampra/cmg509.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Beaton RD, et al: Social Support and Network Conflict in Firefighters and Paramedics1. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1997, 19 (3): 297-10.1177/019394599701900303.CrossRefPubMed Beaton RD, et al: Social Support and Network Conflict in Firefighters and Paramedics1. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1997, 19 (3): 297-10.1177/019394599701900303.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: a web-based survey of primary care physicians
Publication date
01-12-2012
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-32

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue