Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Hip-TEP | Research

15-year survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem in primary hip arthroplasty

Authors: David F. Scott, Kade Eppich, Edin Mehić, Celeste Gray, Crystal Lederhos Smith, Michael Johnston

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hip offset, version, and length are interdependent femoral variables which determine stability and leg length. Balancing these competing variables remains a core challenge in hip arthroplasty. The potential benefits of modular femoral stems have been overshadowed by higher rates of failure. The objective of this study was to assess the survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem at an average 15-year follow-up period.

Methods

The records of all patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with this device between 2004–2009 were reviewed. There were no exclusions for BMI or other factors. We examined the data with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The primary endpoint for survival was mechanical failure of the modular neck-body junction.

Results

The survivorship of this device in 172 subjects was 100% with none experiencing mechanical failure of the modular junction at an average of 15 years. 60 patients died of causes unrelated to their THA and 9 patients were lost to follow-up. There were three early (≤ 12 months) dislocations (1.7%), and seven total dislocations (4.1%). 16 patients underwent reoperations during the follow-up period, none for any complication of the modular junction. Radiographic results showed well-fixed femoral stems in all cases. There were no leg length discrepancies of greater than 10 mm, and 85% were within 5 mm.

Conclusion

There were no mechanical failures of the modular junction in any of the subjects over the average 15-year period, demonstrating that this dual-modular design is not associated with increased failure rates. We achieved a 1.7% early dislocation rate and a 4.1% total dislocation rate without any clinically significant leg length discrepancies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg. 2018;100(17):1455.PubMedCrossRef Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg. 2018;100(17):1455.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hariri S, Chun S, Cowan JB, Bragdon C, Malchau H, Rubash HE. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1625.PubMedCrossRef Hariri S, Chun S, Cowan JB, Bragdon C, Malchau H, Rubash HE. Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1625.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sculco PK, Austin MS, Lavernia CJ, Rosenberg AG, Sierra RJ. Preventing Leg Length Discrepancy and Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2016;65:225.PubMed Sculco PK, Austin MS, Lavernia CJ, Rosenberg AG, Sierra RJ. Preventing Leg Length Discrepancy and Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2016;65:225.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Turley GA, Griffin DR, Williams MA. Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Compu. 2014;52(8):685.CrossRef Turley GA, Griffin DR, Williams MA. Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Compu. 2014;52(8):685.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berry DJ. Utility of modular implants in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(4):657.PubMedCrossRef Berry DJ. Utility of modular implants in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(4):657.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Colas S, Allalou A, Poichotte A, Piriou P, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M. Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(8):2046.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Colas S, Allalou A, Poichotte A, Piriou P, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M. Exchangeable Femoral Neck (Dual-Modular) THA Prostheses Have Poorer Survivorship Than Other Designs: A Nationwide Cohort of 324,108 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(8):2046.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giori NJ. CORR Insights: High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):154.PubMedCrossRef Giori NJ. CORR Insights: High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):154.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Krishnan H, Krishnan SP, Blunn G, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. Modular neck femoral stems. Bone Joint J. 2013;95 b(8):1011.PubMedCrossRef Krishnan H, Krishnan SP, Blunn G, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. Modular neck femoral stems. Bone Joint J. 2013;95 b(8):1011.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mihalko WM, Wimmer MA, Pacione CA, Laurent MP, Murphy RF, Rider C. How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3747.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mihalko WM, Wimmer MA, Pacione CA, Laurent MP, Murphy RF, Rider C. How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3747.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pour AE, Borden R, Murayama T, Groll-Brown M, Blaha JD. High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):146.PubMedCrossRef Pour AE, Borden R, Murayama T, Groll-Brown M, Blaha JD. High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):146.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Su SL, Koch CN, Nguyen TM, Burket JC, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Retrieval Analysis of Neck-Stem Coupling in Modular Hip Prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(7):2301.PubMedCrossRef Su SL, Koch CN, Nguyen TM, Burket JC, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Retrieval Analysis of Neck-Stem Coupling in Modular Hip Prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(7):2301.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zajc J, Moličnik A, Fokter SK. Dual Modular Titanium Alloy Femoral stem failure mechanisms and suggested clinical approaches. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(11):3078.PubMedCrossRef Zajc J, Moličnik A, Fokter SK. Dual Modular Titanium Alloy Femoral stem failure mechanisms and suggested clinical approaches. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(11):3078.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bernstein DT, Meftah M, Paranilam J, Incavo SJ. Eighty-six Percent Failure Rate of a Modular-Neck Femoral Stem Design at 3 to 5 Years: Lessons Learned. J Bone Joint Surg. 2016;98(12):e49.PubMedCrossRef Bernstein DT, Meftah M, Paranilam J, Incavo SJ. Eighty-six Percent Failure Rate of a Modular-Neck Femoral Stem Design at 3 to 5 Years: Lessons Learned. J Bone Joint Surg. 2016;98(12):e49.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ. Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(10):865.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ. Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(10):865.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dangles CJ, Altstetter CJ. Failure of the modular neck in a total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(7):1169.e5.PubMedCrossRef Dangles CJ, Altstetter CJ. Failure of the modular neck in a total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(7):1169.e5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ellman MB, Levine BR. Fracture of the modular femoral neck component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):196.e1.PubMedCrossRef Ellman MB, Levine BR. Fracture of the modular femoral neck component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):196.e1.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fokter SK, Rudolf R, Moličnik A. Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture–clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(2):197.PubMed Fokter SK, Rudolf R, Moličnik A. Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture–clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(2):197.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lanting BA, Teeter MG, Vasarhelyi EM, Ivanov TG, Howard JL, Naudie DD. Correlation of corrosion and biomechanics in the retrieval of a single modular neck total hip arthroplasty design: modular neck total hip arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(1):135.PubMedCrossRef Lanting BA, Teeter MG, Vasarhelyi EM, Ivanov TG, Howard JL, Naudie DD. Correlation of corrosion and biomechanics in the retrieval of a single modular neck total hip arthroplasty design: modular neck total hip arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(1):135.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Skendzel JG, Blaha JD, Urquhart AG. Total hip arthroplasty modular neck failure. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):338.e1.PubMedCrossRef Skendzel JG, Blaha JD, Urquhart AG. Total hip arthroplasty modular neck failure. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):338.e1.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sotereanos NG, Sauber TJ, Tupis TT. Modular femoral neck fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):196.e7.PubMedCrossRef Sotereanos NG, Sauber TJ, Tupis TT. Modular femoral neck fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(1):196.e7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Werner SD, Bono JV, Nandi S, Ward DM, Talmo CT. Adverse tissue reactions in modular exchangeable neck implants: a report of two cases. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(3):543.e13.PubMedCrossRef Werner SD, Bono JV, Nandi S, Ward DM, Talmo CT. Adverse tissue reactions in modular exchangeable neck implants: a report of two cases. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(3):543.e13.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Benazzo F, Rossi SM, Cecconi D, Piovani L, Ravasi F. Mid-term results of an uncemented femoral stem with modular neck options. Hip Int. 2010;20(4):427.PubMedCrossRef Benazzo F, Rossi SM, Cecconi D, Piovani L, Ravasi F. Mid-term results of an uncemented femoral stem with modular neck options. Hip Int. 2010;20(4):427.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cameron H, McTighe T. Experience with Modular Necks for Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reconstr Rev. 2016;6(1):13–8. Cameron H, McTighe T. Experience with Modular Necks for Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reconstr Rev. 2016;6(1):13–8.
26.
go back to reference Lex JR, Welch MD, See A, Edwards TC, Stavropoulos NA, Babis GC. Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision. Hip Int. 2021;31(3):295.PubMedCrossRef Lex JR, Welch MD, See A, Edwards TC, Stavropoulos NA, Babis GC. Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision. Hip Int. 2021;31(3):295.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Miki H, Sugano N. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(9):944.PubMedCrossRef Miki H, Sugano N. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(9):944.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tkach T, McTighe T. The 16-Year Evolution of Proximal Modular Stem Design – Eliminating Failure of Modular Junction. Reconstr Rev. 2017;7(3):29–34. Tkach T, McTighe T. The 16-Year Evolution of Proximal Modular Stem Design – Eliminating Failure of Modular Junction. Reconstr Rev. 2017;7(3):29–34.
30.
go back to reference Traina F, De Clerico M, Biondi F, Pilla F, Tassinari E, Toni A. Sex differences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? The J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(Suppl6):121.PubMedCrossRef Traina F, De Clerico M, Biondi F, Pilla F, Tassinari E, Toni A. Sex differences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? The J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(Suppl6):121.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference McTighe T. Cementless Modular Stems. J Implant Surg Res Found. 2002;1:1–9. Update April 2012. McTighe T. Cementless Modular Stems. J Implant Surg Res Found. 2002;1:1–9. Update April 2012.
32.
go back to reference McTighe T, Brazil D, Keppler L, Keggi J, McPherson E. Metallic Modular Taper Junctions in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reconstr Rev. 2015;5(2):29–42. McTighe T, Brazil D, Keppler L, Keggi J, McPherson E. Metallic Modular Taper Junctions in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Reconstr Rev. 2015;5(2):29–42.
33.
go back to reference Kwon YM. Evaluation of the painful dual taper modular neck stem total hip Arthroplasty: do they all require revision? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(7):1385.PubMedCrossRef Kwon YM. Evaluation of the painful dual taper modular neck stem total hip Arthroplasty: do they all require revision? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(7):1385.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kwon YM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Cabanela ME, Jacobs JJ. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2060.PubMedCrossRef Kwon YM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Cabanela ME, Jacobs JJ. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2060.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Meneghini RM, Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ. Evaluation and treatment of painful total hip arthroplasties with modular metal taper junctions. Orthopedics. 2012;35(5):386.PubMedCrossRef Meneghini RM, Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ. Evaluation and treatment of painful total hip arthroplasties with modular metal taper junctions. Orthopedics. 2012;35(5):386.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kop AM, Keogh C, Swarts E. Proximal component modularity in THA–at what cost? An implant retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(7):1885.PubMedCrossRef Kop AM, Keogh C, Swarts E. Proximal component modularity in THA–at what cost? An implant retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(7):1885.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Molloy DO, Munir S, Jack CM, Cross MB, Walter WL, Walter WK Sr. Fretting and corrosion in modular-neck total hip arthroplasty femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96(6):488.PubMedCrossRef Molloy DO, Munir S, Jack CM, Cross MB, Walter WL, Walter WK Sr. Fretting and corrosion in modular-neck total hip arthroplasty femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg. 2014;96(6):488.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Walsh CP, Hubbard JC, Nessler JP, Markel DC. Revision of Recalled Modular Neck Rejuvenate and ABG Femoral Implants. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(5):822.PubMedCrossRef Walsh CP, Hubbard JC, Nessler JP, Markel DC. Revision of Recalled Modular Neck Rejuvenate and ABG Femoral Implants. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(5):822.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Carothers JT, Archibeck MJ, Tripuraneni KR. Modular Versus Nonmodular Femoral Necks for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(9):411.PubMed Carothers JT, Archibeck MJ, Tripuraneni KR. Modular Versus Nonmodular Femoral Necks for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(9):411.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Patel A, Bliss J, Calfee RP, Froehlich J, Limbird R. Modular femoral stem-sleeve junction failure after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1143.e1.PubMedCrossRef Patel A, Bliss J, Calfee RP, Froehlich J, Limbird R. Modular femoral stem-sleeve junction failure after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1143.e1.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kent M, Edmondson M, Ebert J, Nivbrant N, Kop A, Wood D, De Steiger R. Stem Migration and Fretting Corrosion of the Antirotation Pin in the K2/Apex Hip System. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(3):727.PubMedCrossRef Kent M, Edmondson M, Ebert J, Nivbrant N, Kop A, Wood D, De Steiger R. Stem Migration and Fretting Corrosion of the Antirotation Pin in the K2/Apex Hip System. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(3):727.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Archibeck MJ, Cummins T, Carothers J, Junick DW, White RE Jr. A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):443.PubMedCrossRef Archibeck MJ, Cummins T, Carothers J, Junick DW, White RE Jr. A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):443.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the “bull’s-eye” more accurately. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10 Suppl):2.PubMed Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL. Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the “bull’s-eye” more accurately. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10 Suppl):2.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Sakai T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(1):62.PubMedCrossRef Sakai T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(1):62.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Preininger B, Schmorl K, von Roth P, Winkler T, Matziolis G, Perka C, Tohtz S. Femoral Offset (3D) in Patients without Osteoarthritis - Index Values from 200 Hip Joints. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:578.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Preininger B, Schmorl K, von Roth P, Winkler T, Matziolis G, Perka C, Tohtz S. Femoral Offset (3D) in Patients without Osteoarthritis - Index Values from 200 Hip Joints. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:578.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis Analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):990.PubMedCrossRef Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis Analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):990.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):123.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):123.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(6):721.PubMedCrossRef Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(6):721.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Ogawa T, Takao M, Hamada H, Sakai T, Sugano N. Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2018;42(9):2059.PubMedCrossRef Ogawa T, Takao M, Hamada H, Sakai T, Sugano N. Soft tissue tension is four times lower in the unstable primary total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2018;42(9):2059.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
go back to reference Bokshan SL, Ruttiman RJ, DePasse JM, Eltorai AEM, Rubin LE, Palumbo MA, Daniels AH. Reported Litigation Associated With Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3573.PubMedCrossRef Bokshan SL, Ruttiman RJ, DePasse JM, Eltorai AEM, Rubin LE, Palumbo MA, Daniels AH. Reported Litigation Associated With Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3573.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Samuel LT, Sultan AA, Rabin JM, Surace PA, Yao B, Moskal JT, Mont MA. Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Nationwide Analysis of the Past Decade. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7S):S102.PubMedCrossRef Samuel LT, Sultan AA, Rabin JM, Surace PA, Yao B, Moskal JT, Mont MA. Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Nationwide Analysis of the Past Decade. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7S):S102.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):386.PubMedCrossRef Abdel MP, von Roth P, Jennings MT, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):386.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Pour AE, Schwarzkopf R, Patel KP, Anjaria M, Lazennec JY, Dorr LD. Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(7):2393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pour AE, Schwarzkopf R, Patel KP, Anjaria M, Lazennec JY, Dorr LD. Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(7):2393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1 Suppl):S9.PubMedCrossRef Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1 Suppl):S9.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Bolland BJ, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ. Indications for early hip revision surgery in the UK–a re-analysis of NJR data. Hip Int. 2012;22(2):145.PubMedCrossRef Bolland BJ, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ. Indications for early hip revision surgery in the UK–a re-analysis of NJR data. Hip Int. 2012;22(2):145.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Berry DJ. Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:265.PubMed Berry DJ. Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:265.PubMed
59.
go back to reference Coventry MB. Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67(6):832.PubMedCrossRef Coventry MB. Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67(6):832.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Padgett DE, Warashina H. The unstable total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:72.CrossRef Padgett DE, Warashina H. The unstable total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:72.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):89.PubMedCrossRef Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):89.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Dunbar MJ. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):640.PubMedCrossRef Dunbar MJ. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):640.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Duwelius PJ, Burkhart B, Carnahan C, Branam G, Ko LM, Wu Y, Froemke C, Wang L, Grunkemeier G. Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1240.PubMedCrossRef Duwelius PJ, Burkhart B, Carnahan C, Branam G, Ko LM, Wu Y, Froemke C, Wang L, Grunkemeier G. Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1240.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Cameron HU. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: opposes. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):641.PubMedCrossRef Cameron HU. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: opposes. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):641.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Loiba V, Stucinskas J, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H, Tarasevicius S. The analysis of posterior soft tissue repair durability after total hip arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis patients. Hip Int. 2015;25(5):420.PubMedCrossRef Loiba V, Stucinskas J, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H, Tarasevicius S. The analysis of posterior soft tissue repair durability after total hip arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis patients. Hip Int. 2015;25(5):420.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference McLawhorn AS, Potter HG, Cross MB, Boettner F, Lim W, Lee YY, Pellicci PM. Posterior Soft Tissue Repair After Primary THA is Durable at Mid-term Followup: A Prospective MRI Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3183.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McLawhorn AS, Potter HG, Cross MB, Boettner F, Lim W, Lee YY, Pellicci PM. Posterior Soft Tissue Repair After Primary THA is Durable at Mid-term Followup: A Prospective MRI Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3183.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Tripuraneni KR, Munson NR, Archibeck MJ, Carothers JT. Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2299.PubMedCrossRef Tripuraneni KR, Munson NR, Archibeck MJ, Carothers JT. Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2299.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Zhang D, Chen L, Peng K, Xing F, Wang H, Xiang Z. Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. OrthopTraumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):39. Zhang D, Chen L, Peng K, Xing F, Wang H, Xiang Z. Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. OrthopTraumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):39.
Metadata
Title
15-year survivorship of a unique dual-modular femoral stem in primary hip arthroplasty
Authors
David F. Scott
Kade Eppich
Edin Mehić
Celeste Gray
Crystal Lederhos Smith
Michael Johnston
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07422-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2024 Go to the issue