Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Symposium: Retrieval Studies

Proximal Component Modularity in THA—At What Cost?: An Implant Retrieval Study

Authors: A. M. Kop, PhD, C. Keogh, DipAppSci, E. Swarts, BSc

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While modular femoral heads have been used in THA for decades, a recent innovation is a second neck-stem taper junction. Clinical advantages include intraoperative adjustment of leg length, femoral anteversion, and easier revision, all providing flexibility to the surgeon; however, there have been reports of catastrophic fracture, cold welding, and corrosion and fretting of the modular junction.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether (1) the neck-stem junction showed the same degradation mechanisms, if any, as the head-neck junction, (2) the junction contributed to THA revision, (3) the alloy affected the degree of degradation, and (4) the trunion machine finish affected the degradation mechanisms.

Methods

We compared 57 retrievals from seven total hip modular designs, three cobalt-chromium-molybdenum and four titanium based: Bionik® (four), GMRS® (four), Margron® (22), Apex® (five), M-series® (five), ZMR® (two), and S-ROM® (15). Macroscopic inspection, microscopy, and micro-CT were conducted to determine the effects of materials and design.

Results

The cobalt-chromium-molybdenum components showed crevice corrosion and fretting of the neck-stem taper, whereas the titanium components had less corrosion; however, there were several cases of cold welding where disassembly could not be achieved in theater.

Conclusions

Even with modern taper designs and corrosion-resistant materials, corrosion, fretting, and particulate debris were observed to a greater extent in the second neck-stem junction. Titanium-based modular arthroplasty may lessen the degree of degradation, but cold welding of the components may occur.

Clinical Relevance

Degradation of the second junction contributed to 8 cases of metallosis and two cases of aseptic lymphocyte-laminated vascular-associated lesions contributing to revision.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Atwood SA, Patten EW, Bozic KJ, Pruitt LA, Ries MD. Corrosion-induced fracture of a double-modular hip prosthesis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1522–1525.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Berry DJ, Von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:9–14.PubMed
4.
Cameron HU. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: opposes. Orthopedics. 2010;33:641.PubMed
5.
Collier JP, Mayor MB, Williams IR, Surprenant VA, Surprenant HP, Currier BH. The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;311:91–101.PubMed
6.
Cook SD, Barrack R, Clemow AJ. Corrosion and wear at the modular interface of uncemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:68–72.PubMed
7.
Dunbar MJ. The proximal modular neck in THA: a bridge too far: affirms. Orthopedics. 2010;33:640.PubMed
8.
Fraitzl C, Buly R, Castellani L, Moya L. Corrosion at the sleeve-stem interface of a modular titanium alloy femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(Suppl IV):514–515.
9.
Fricker DC, Shivanath R. Fretting corrosion studies of universal femoral head prostheses and cone taper spigots. Biomaterials. 1990;11:495–500.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Frost RB, Sekel R, Kandel L. The engineering design of the MARGRON® femoral hip prosthesis system. J Eng Design. 2003;14:115–127.CrossRef
11.
Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CO. The John Charnley Award. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus large diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:318–325.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans SA. Multicenter retrieval study of the taper interfaces of modular hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–161.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NH, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1447–1458.PubMed
14.
Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Gilbert JL, Skipor AK, Black J, Jasty M, Galante JO. Local and distant products from modularity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:94–105.PubMed
15.
Khan MA, Williams RL, Williams DF. In-vitro corrosion and wear of titanium alloys in the biological environment. Biomaterials. 1996;17:2117–2126.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Kop AM, Swarts E. Corrosion of a hip stem with a modular neck taper junction: a retrieval study of 16 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1019–1023.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Krachler M, Thomsen M, Heisel C. Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1531–1536.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Pallini F, Cristofolini L, Traina F, Toni A. Modular hip stems: determination of disassembly force of a neck-stern coupling. Artif Organs. 2007;31:166–170.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Patntirapong S, Habibovic P, Hauschka PV. Effects of soluble cobalt and cobalt incorporated into calcium phosphate layers on osteoclast differentiation and activation. Biomaterials. 2009;30:548–555.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Salvati EA, Lieberman JR, Huk OL, Evans BG. Complications of femoral and acetabular modularity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:85–93.PubMed
22.
Schramm M, Wirtz DC, Holzwarth U, Pitto RP. The Morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement—a biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2000;45:105–109.CrossRef
23.
Sporer SM, Della Valle C, Jacobs J, Wimmer M. A case of disassociation of a modular femoral neck trunion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:918–921.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Viceconti M, Baleani M, Squarzoni S, Toni A. Fretting wear in a modular neck hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;35:207–216.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Viceconti M, Ruggeri O, Toni A, Giunti A. Design-related fretting in modular neck hip prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:181–186.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Köster G, Lohmann CH. Metal-on-metal hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints: a clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:28–36.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Proximal Component Modularity in THA—At What Cost?: An Implant Retrieval Study
Authors
A. M. Kop, PhD
C. Keogh, DipAppSci
E. Swarts, BSc
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2155-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 7/2012 Go to the issue

Symposium: Retrieval Studies

How Do CAD Models Compare With Reverse Engineered Manufactured Components for Use in Wear Analysis?

Symposium: Retrieval Studies

Is Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1 Elevated in Aseptic Loosening of TKA?: A Pilot Study

Clinical Research

High 10-Year Survival Rate with an Anatomic Cementless Stem (SPS)

Clinical Research

Few Insurance-Based Differences in Upper Extremity Elective Surgery Rates After Healthcare Reform

Clinical Research

Preoperative Three-dimensional CT Predicts Intraoperative Findings in Hip Arthroscopy

Reply to Letter to the Editor

Reply to Letter to the Editor: Increased Anteversion of Press-Fit Femoral Stems Compared with Anatomic Femur