Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2024

05-02-2024 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Outcomes of Salvage Surgery Versus Non-Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Conversion Therapy with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Authors: Jun-Yi Wu, MD, PhD, Jia-Yi Wu, MD, Yang-Kai Fu, MD, Xiang-Ye Ou, MD, Shu-Qun Li, MD, Zhi-Bo Zhang, MD, Jian-Yin Zhou, MD, Bin Li, MD, Shuang-Jia Wang, MD, Yu-Feng Chen, MD, Mao-Lin Yan, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Combination treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies (triple therapy) has a high rate of tumor response and converted resection for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of salvage surgery in uHCC patients after conversion therapy with triple therapy.

Methods

uHCC patients who met the criteria for hepatectomy after receiving triple therapy as first-line treatment were eligible for inclusion in this study. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients who received salvage surgery (SR group) and those who did not (non-SR group) were compared.

Results

Of the 144 patients assessed, 91 patients underwent salvage surgery and 53 did not. The OS rates in the SR group were significantly better than those in the non-SR group. The 1- and 2-year OS rates in the SR group were 92.0% and 79.9%, respectively, whereas those in the non-SR group were 85.5% and 39.6 %, respectively (p = 0.007); however, there was no significant difference in the PFS rates. Upon further stratification, OS and PFS were significantly better in the SR group than in the non-SR group in patients who were assessed as partial responses (PR), while there was no significant difference in patients who were assessed as complete response (CR).

Conclusions

Salvage surgery is recommended and is associated with a favorable prognosis for uHCC patients who were assessed as PR after conversion therapy, however it may not be necessary for uHCC if CR was achieved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
33.
go back to reference Masatoshi K, Tomoko A, Kazuomi U, et al. Achievement of complete response and drug-free status by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with or without curative conversion in patients with transarterial chemoembolization-unsuitable, intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter proof-of-concept study. Liver Cancer. 2023;12(4):321–38. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529574.CrossRef Masatoshi K, Tomoko A, Kazuomi U, et al. Achievement of complete response and drug-free status by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with or without curative conversion in patients with transarterial chemoembolization-unsuitable, intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter proof-of-concept study. Liver Cancer. 2023;12(4):321–38. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000529574.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of Salvage Surgery Versus Non-Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Conversion Therapy with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Authors
Jun-Yi Wu, MD, PhD
Jia-Yi Wu, MD
Yang-Kai Fu, MD
Xiang-Ye Ou, MD
Shu-Qun Li, MD
Zhi-Bo Zhang, MD
Jian-Yin Zhou, MD
Bin Li, MD
Shuang-Jia Wang, MD
Yu-Feng Chen, MD
Mao-Lin Yan, MD, PhD
Publication date
05-02-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-14944-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2024 Go to the issue