Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Cell International 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Review

Efficacy and safety of various primary treatment strategies for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

Authors: Sha Yang, Huapeng Lin, Jianning Song

Published in: Cancer Cell International | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several treatments are available for treatment of early and very early-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma, also known as small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SHCC). However, there is no consensus with regards to the efficacies of these methods. We aimed at identifying the most effective initial treatment strategy for SHCC through Bayesian network meta-analyses.

Methods

Studies published between January, 2010, and February, 2021 were searched in EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of science databases, and conference proceedings for trials. The included studies reported the survival outcomes of very early and early Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients subjected to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), surgical resection (SR), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), minimally invasive liver surgery (MIS), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and cryoablation (CA). Then, data were extracted from studies that met the inclusion criteria. Patient survival data were retrieved from the published Kaplan–Meier curves and pooled. A Bayesian random-effects model was used to combine direct and indirect evidence.

Results

A total of 2058 articles were retrieved and screened, from which 45 studies assessing the efficacies of 8 different treatments in 11,364 patients were selected. The included studies had high methodological quality. Recurrence free survival* (progression/recurrence/relapse/disease/tumor-free survival were combined and redefined as RFS*) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were highest in MIS-treated patients (HR 0·57, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0·38–0·85; HR 0.48,95% CI 0.36–0.64, respectively), followed by SR-treated patients (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50–0.74; HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55–0.72, respectively). TACE was highly efficacious (58.9%) at decreasing the rates of major complications. Similar findings were obtained through sensitivity analysis, and in most of the prognostic subgroups.

Conclusions

MIS and SR exhibited the highest clinical efficacies, however, they were associated with higher rates of complications. Ablation is effective in small tumors, whereas SBRT is a relatively promising treatment option for SHCC. More well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be performed to validate our findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Erratum in: J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):817. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182–236. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jhep.​2018.​03.​019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. Erratum in: J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):817.
7.
go back to reference Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Heimbach JK. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29913.CrossRefPubMed Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Heimbach JK. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hep.​29913.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brandi G, Rizzo A, Dall Olio FG, Felicani C, Ercolani G, Cescon M, Frega G, Tavolari S, Palloni A, De Lorenzo S, Abbati F, Mollica V, Ricci AD, Serra C. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective, single-center experience. Inter J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):479–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1763484.CrossRef Brandi G, Rizzo A, Dall Olio FG, Felicani C, Ercolani G, Cescon M, Frega G, Tavolari S, Palloni A, De Lorenzo S, Abbati F, Mollica V, Ricci AD, Serra C. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective, single-center experience. Inter J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):479–85. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​02656736.​2020.​1763484.CrossRef
19.
21.
go back to reference Liu W, Zheng Y, He W, Zou R, Qiu J, Shen J, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang Y, Zuo D, Li B, Yuan Y. Microwave vs radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(6):671–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14929 (Epub 2018 Jul 31).CrossRefPubMed Liu W, Zheng Y, He W, Zou R, Qiu J, Shen J, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang Y, Zuo D, Li B, Yuan Y. Microwave vs radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a propensity score analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(6):671–81. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apt.​14929 (Epub 2018 Jul 31).CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ikeda M, Kudo M, Aikata H, Nagamatsu H, Ishii H, Yokosuka O, Torimura T, Morimoto M, Ikeda K, Kumada H, Sato T, Kawai I, Yamashita T, Horio H, Okusaka T, Miriplatin TACE Study Group. Transarterial chemoembolization with miriplatin vs. epirubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(2):281–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1374-6 (Epub 2017 Aug 1).CrossRefPubMed Ikeda M, Kudo M, Aikata H, Nagamatsu H, Ishii H, Yokosuka O, Torimura T, Morimoto M, Ikeda K, Kumada H, Sato T, Kawai I, Yamashita T, Horio H, Okusaka T, Miriplatin TACE Study Group. Transarterial chemoembolization with miriplatin vs. epirubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(2):281–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00535-017-1374-6 (Epub 2017 Aug 1).CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Solà R, Rodés J, Bruix J, Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1734–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Solà R, Rodés J, Bruix J, Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1734–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(02)08649-X.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catalá-López F, Gøtzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385.CrossRefPubMed Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, Ioannidis JP, Straus S, Thorlund K, Jansen JP, Mulrow C, Catalá-López F, Gøtzsche PC, Dickersin K, Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M14-2385.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Shamsaeefar A, Nikeghbalian S, Kazemi K, Gholami S, Motazedian N, Motazedian N, Fallahzadeh ME, Moini M, Gramizadeh B, Malekhosseini SA. Predictors of tumor-free survival after liver transplant in patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13(Suppl 1):139–44.PubMed Shamsaeefar A, Nikeghbalian S, Kazemi K, Gholami S, Motazedian N, Motazedian N, Fallahzadeh ME, Moini M, Gramizadeh B, Malekhosseini SA. Predictors of tumor-free survival after liver transplant in patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13(Suppl 1):139–44.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Vietti Violi N, Duran R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, Aubé C, Digklia A, Pache I, Deltenre P, Knebel JF, Denys A. Efficacy of microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(5):317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30029-3 (Epub 2018 Mar 2).CrossRefPubMed Vietti Violi N, Duran R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, Aubé C, Digklia A, Pache I, Deltenre P, Knebel JF, Denys A. Efficacy of microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(5):317–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2468-1253(18)30029-3 (Epub 2018 Mar 2).CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Abdelaziz A, Elbaz T, Shousha HI, Mahmoud S, Ibrahim M, Abdelmaksoud A, Nabeel M. Efficacy and survival analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency versus microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Egyptian multidisciplinary clinic experience. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(12):3429–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3617-4 (Epub 2014 Jun 17).CrossRefPubMed Abdelaziz A, Elbaz T, Shousha HI, Mahmoud S, Ibrahim M, Abdelmaksoud A, Nabeel M. Efficacy and survival analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency versus microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Egyptian multidisciplinary clinic experience. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(12):3429–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-014-3617-4 (Epub 2014 Jun 17).CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Cillo U, Noaro G, Vitale A, Neri D, D’Amico F, Gringeri E, Farinati F, Vincenzi V, Vigo M, Zanus G, HePaTIC Study Group. Laparoscopic microwave ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(11):979–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12264 (Epub 2014 Apr 18).CrossRef Cillo U, Noaro G, Vitale A, Neri D, D’Amico F, Gringeri E, Farinati F, Vincenzi V, Vigo M, Zanus G, HePaTIC Study Group. Laparoscopic microwave ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(11):979–86. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​hpb.​12264 (Epub 2014 Apr 18).CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ghweil A, Osman H. Percutaneous microwave and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(1):1–266.CrossRef Ghweil A, Osman H. Percutaneous microwave and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(1):1–266.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Wong KM, Yeh ML, Chuang SC, Wang LY, Lin ZY, Chen SC, Tsai JF, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Dai CY, Yu ML, Lee KT, Chuang WL. Survival comparison between surgical resection and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013;32(4):253–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-012-0225-x (Epub 2012 Aug 30).CrossRefPubMed Wong KM, Yeh ML, Chuang SC, Wang LY, Lin ZY, Chen SC, Tsai JF, Wang SN, Kuo KK, Dai CY, Yu ML, Lee KT, Chuang WL. Survival comparison between surgical resection and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for patients in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013;32(4):253–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12664-012-0225-x (Epub 2012 Aug 30).CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Imai K, Beppu T, Chikamoto A, Doi K, Okabe H, Hayashi H, Nitta H, Ishiko T, Takamori H, Baba H. Comparison between hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation as first-line treatment for solitary small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(8):853–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.12035 (Epub 2013 Jan 2).CrossRefPubMed Imai K, Beppu T, Chikamoto A, Doi K, Okabe H, Hayashi H, Nitta H, Ishiko T, Takamori H, Baba H. Comparison between hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation as first-line treatment for solitary small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma of 3 cm or less. Hepatol Res. 2013;43(8):853–64. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​hepr.​12035 (Epub 2013 Jan 2).CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Yang HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH, Yu SJ, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, Kim HC, Lee JM, Chung JW, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS, Lee HS. Small single-nodule hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic resection by using inverse probability weighting. Radiology. 2014;271(3):909–18. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131760 (Epub 2014 Feb 8).CrossRefPubMed Yang HJ, Lee JH, Lee DH, Yu SJ, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, Kim HC, Lee JM, Chung JW, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS, Lee HS. Small single-nodule hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic resection by using inverse probability weighting. Radiology. 2014;271(3):909–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​13131760 (Epub 2014 Feb 8).CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Hocquelet A, Balageas P, Laurent C, Blanc JF, Frulio N, Salut C, Cassinotto C, Saric J, Possenti L, Bernard PH, Montaudon M, Trillaud H. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a study of 281 Western patients. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(7):749–57. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2015.1068382 (Epub 2015 Sep 12).CrossRefPubMed Hocquelet A, Balageas P, Laurent C, Blanc JF, Frulio N, Salut C, Cassinotto C, Saric J, Possenti L, Bernard PH, Montaudon M, Trillaud H. Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria: a study of 281 Western patients. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(7):749–57. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3109/​02656736.​2015.​1068382 (Epub 2015 Sep 12).CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Guan TP, Fang CH, Yang J, Xiang N, Chen QS, Zhong SZ. A Comparison between three-dimensional visualization guided hepatectomy and ultrasonography guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma within the milan criteria. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8931732. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8931732 (Epub 2016 May 12. Retraction in: Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8014852).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guan TP, Fang CH, Yang J, Xiang N, Chen QS, Zhong SZ. A Comparison between three-dimensional visualization guided hepatectomy and ultrasonography guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma within the milan criteria. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8931732. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2016/​8931732 (Epub 2016 May 12. Retraction in: Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8014852).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
71.
go back to reference Di Sandro S, Benuzzi L, Lauterio A, Botta F, De Carlis R, Najjar M, Centonze L, Danieli M, Pezzoli I, Rampoldi A, Bagnardi V, De Carlis L. Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma approached by curative-intent treatment: a propensity score analysis comparing radiofrequency ablation and liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(9):1691–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.023 (Epub 2019 Apr 29).CrossRefPubMed Di Sandro S, Benuzzi L, Lauterio A, Botta F, De Carlis R, Najjar M, Centonze L, Danieli M, Pezzoli I, Rampoldi A, Bagnardi V, De Carlis L. Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma approached by curative-intent treatment: a propensity score analysis comparing radiofrequency ablation and liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(9):1691–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2019.​04.​023 (Epub 2019 Apr 29).CrossRefPubMed
72.
75.
go back to reference Vitali GC, Laurent A, Terraz S, Majno P, Buchs NC, Rubbia-Brandt L, Luciani A, Calderaro J, Morel P, Azoulay D, Toso C. Minimally invasive surgery versus percutaneous radio frequency ablation for the treatment of single small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2301–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4295-6 (Epub 2015 Nov 3).CrossRefPubMed Vitali GC, Laurent A, Terraz S, Majno P, Buchs NC, Rubbia-Brandt L, Luciani A, Calderaro J, Morel P, Azoulay D, Toso C. Minimally invasive surgery versus percutaneous radio frequency ablation for the treatment of single small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2301–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-015-4295-6 (Epub 2015 Nov 3).CrossRefPubMed
77.
go back to reference Chong CC, Lee KF, Chu CM, Chan AW, Yu SC, Lai PB. Laparoscopic hepatectomy (with or without robotic assistance) versus radiofrequency ablation as a minimally invasive treatment for very early-stage or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497112 (Epub 2019 Mar 27).CrossRefPubMed Chong CC, Lee KF, Chu CM, Chan AW, Yu SC, Lai PB. Laparoscopic hepatectomy (with or without robotic assistance) versus radiofrequency ablation as a minimally invasive treatment for very early-stage or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Surg. 2020;37(1):65–71. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000497112 (Epub 2019 Mar 27).CrossRefPubMed
81.
82.
go back to reference Martin AN, Wilkins LR, Das D, Johnston LE, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm. Am Surg. 2019;85(2):150–5.CrossRefPubMed Martin AN, Wilkins LR, Das D, Johnston LE, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm. Am Surg. 2019;85(2):150–5.CrossRefPubMed
83.
go back to reference Wang C, Wang H, Yang W, Hu K, Xie H, Hu KQ, Bai W, Dong Z, Lu Y, Zeng Z, Lou M, Wang H, Gao X, Chang X, An L, Qu J, Li J, Yang Y. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1579–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27548 (Epub 2015 Mar 20).CrossRefPubMed Wang C, Wang H, Yang W, Hu K, Xie H, Hu KQ, Bai W, Dong Z, Lu Y, Zeng Z, Lou M, Wang H, Gao X, Chang X, An L, Qu J, Li J, Yang Y. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2015;61(5):1579–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hep.​27548 (Epub 2015 Mar 20).CrossRefPubMed
87.
go back to reference Tsoris A, Marlar CA. Use of the child pugh score in liver disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Tsoris A, Marlar CA. Use of the child pugh score in liver disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021
89.
go back to reference Garuti F, Neri A, Avanzato F, Gramenzi A, Rampoldi D, Rucci P, Farinati F, Giannini EG, Piscaglia F, Rapaccini GL, Di Marco M, Caturelli E, Zoli M, Sacco R, Cabibbo G, Marra F, Mega A, Morisco F, Gasbarrini A, Svegliati-Baroni G, Foschi FG, Missale G, Masotto A, Nardone G, Raimondo G, Azzaroli F, Vidili G, Brunetto MR, Trevisani F, ITA.LI.CA study group. The changing scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: an update. Liver Int. 2021;41(3):585–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14735 (Epub 2020 Dec 2).CrossRefPubMed Garuti F, Neri A, Avanzato F, Gramenzi A, Rampoldi D, Rucci P, Farinati F, Giannini EG, Piscaglia F, Rapaccini GL, Di Marco M, Caturelli E, Zoli M, Sacco R, Cabibbo G, Marra F, Mega A, Morisco F, Gasbarrini A, Svegliati-Baroni G, Foschi FG, Missale G, Masotto A, Nardone G, Raimondo G, Azzaroli F, Vidili G, Brunetto MR, Trevisani F, ITA.LI.CA study group. The changing scenario of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy: an update. Liver Int. 2021;41(3):585–97. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​liv.​14735 (Epub 2020 Dec 2).CrossRefPubMed
90.
go back to reference Tsochatzis E, Meyer T, O’Beirne J, Burroughs AK. Transarterial chemoembolisation is not superior to embolisation alone: the recent European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)—European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1509–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.012 (Epub 2012 Dec 8).CrossRefPubMed Tsochatzis E, Meyer T, O’Beirne J, Burroughs AK. Transarterial chemoembolisation is not superior to embolisation alone: the recent European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)—European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1509–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2012.​11.​012 (Epub 2012 Dec 8).CrossRefPubMed
91.
102.
112.
go back to reference Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ, Platt RW, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Brophy J, Rossignol M. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(10):1203–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm189; (Epub 2007 Aug 21).CrossRefPubMed Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ, Platt RW, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Brophy J, Rossignol M. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(10):1203–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​aje/​kwm189; (Epub 2007 Aug 21).CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of various primary treatment strategies for very early and early hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis
Authors
Sha Yang
Huapeng Lin
Jianning Song
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cancer Cell International / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1475-2867
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02365-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Cancer Cell International 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine