Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2024

11-04-2024 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Clinical Investigation

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score is Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Conventional Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Authors: Zhuofan Deng, Wenfeng Zhang, Junwei Peng, Linxiao Gao, Chunyu Zhang, Kai Lei, Jianping Gong, Bin Xiong

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in determining the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE).

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 936 patients who underwent cTACE for HCC between January 2012 and December 2018, and divided them into two groups based on their CONUT score. To balance the bias in baseline characteristics, propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was conducted. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to establish a cumulative survival curve, and the log-rank test was employed to determine differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among the CONUT score groups. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazard model was employed to assess the correlation between CONUT score and OS and PFS, whereby hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were computed.

Results

Before PSM, the median OS for the low (≤ 3) and high (≥ 4) CONUT group (558 vs. 378 patients) was 21.7 and 15.6 months, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.7 and 5 months. Following PSM, both the low and high CONUT score groups comprised 142 patients. The low CONUT score group exhibited a significantly longer OS compared to the high CONUT score group, as determined by the log-rank test (median OS 22.2 vs. 17.0 months, P = 0.014). No significant association was observed between CONUT group and PFS (median PFS 6.4 vs. 4.7 months, log-rank test, P = 0.121). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a CONUT score of ≥ 4 was an independent risk factor for OS in patients with HCC who underwent cTACE (HR = 1.361; 95% CI: 1.047–1.771; P = 0.022). These findings were consistent across most subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

A high CONUT score has been found to be a prognostic factor for poorer OS in patients with HCC who underwent cTACE.

Level of Evidence

Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Schirmacher P, Vilgrain V, European Assoc Study L. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.CrossRef Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, Schirmacher P, Vilgrain V, European Assoc Study L. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ignacio de Ulíbarri J, González-Madroño A, de Villar NG, et al. CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp. 2005;20:38–45.PubMed Ignacio de Ulíbarri J, González-Madroño A, de Villar NG, et al. CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp. 2005;20:38–45.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score is Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Conventional Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis
Authors
Zhuofan Deng
Wenfeng Zhang
Junwei Peng
Linxiao Gao
Chunyu Zhang
Kai Lei
Jianping Gong
Bin Xiong
Publication date
11-04-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03712-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2024 Go to the issue