Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2014

01-05-2014

Health-Related Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer

Authors: Ji Yeon Park, Bang Wool Eom, Min Jung Jo, Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Young-Woo Kim, Byung-Ho Nam, Jun Ho Lee

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to assess the chronological change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) for early gastric cancer (EGC) and to compare the HRQOL of the patients undergoing RADG with that of the general population.

Methods

Patients undergoing RADG for EGC between March 2010 and May 2011 were enrolled. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the gastric cancer-specific module (QLQ-STO22) were completed before the operation and at 1 week as well as 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. HRQOL data of the enrolled patients were compared to reference values obtained from the general population.

Results

A total of 30 patients were enrolled, and the overall compliance for questionnaire response was 94.4 %. The worst scores for most of the domains were observed at 1 week postsurgery and usually returned to baseline levels within 3 months, except for fatigue, dysphagia, pain, and eating restriction. Diarrhea was the only symptom that did not recovered after 1 year. Before surgery, patients reported significantly worse social function and financial difficulties compared to the general population, which persisted for 1 year postsurgery.

Conclusions

The immediate deterioration of HRQOL after RADG was restored to baseline levels within 3 months postsurgery in the majority of the patients. Robotic assistance might aid in the rapid recovery of global health status after surgery in EGC patients. Prolonged impairment in social function compared with the general population suggests that psychological support is necessary even for EGC patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ et al (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211PubMedCrossRef Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ et al (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH et al (2011) Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 146:1086–1092PubMedCrossRef Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH et al (2011) Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg 146:1086–1092PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW et al (2012) Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:57–63PubMedCrossRef Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW et al (2012) Comparison of surgical performance and short-term clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic surgery in distal gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:57–63PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH et al (2012) Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1377–1381PubMedCrossRef Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH et al (2012) Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1377–1381PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH et al (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99:1554–1561PubMedCrossRef Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH et al (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99:1554–1561PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee SE, Kim YW, Lee JH et al (2009) Developing an institutional protocol guideline for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2231–2236PubMedCrossRef Lee SE, Kim YW, Lee JH et al (2009) Developing an institutional protocol guideline for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2231–2236PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376PubMedCrossRef Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vickery CW, Blazeby JM, Conroy T et al (2001) Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life module for use in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 37:966–971PubMedCrossRef Vickery CW, Blazeby JM, Conroy T et al (2001) Development of an EORTC disease-specific quality of life module for use in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 37:966–971PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Bottomley A et al (2004) Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:2260–2268PubMedCrossRef Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Bottomley A et al (2004) Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:2260–2268PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yun YH, Park YS, Lee ES et al (2004) Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 13:863–868PubMedCrossRef Yun YH, Park YS, Lee ES et al (2004) Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 13:863–868PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. EORTC Quality of Life Group, Brussels
13.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D (2007) Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Fayers PM, Machin D (2007) Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yun YH, Kim SH, Lee KM et al (2007) Age, sex, and comorbidities were considered in comparing reference data for health-related quality of life in the general and cancer populations. J Clin Epidemiol 60:1164–1175PubMedCrossRef Yun YH, Kim SH, Lee KM et al (2007) Age, sex, and comorbidities were considered in comparing reference data for health-related quality of life in the general and cancer populations. J Clin Epidemiol 60:1164–1175PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Roukos DH (1999) Current advances and changes in treatment strategy may improve survival and quality of life in patients with potentially curable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:46–56PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH (1999) Current advances and changes in treatment strategy may improve survival and quality of life in patients with potentially curable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:46–56PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S et al (2004) Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy—Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol 22:2767–2773PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S et al (2004) Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy—Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol 22:2767–2773PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Collado-Hidalgo A, Bower JE, Ganz PA et al (2006) Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res 12:2759–2766PubMedCrossRef Collado-Hidalgo A, Bower JE, Ganz PA et al (2006) Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res 12:2759–2766PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Allan JG, Gerskowitch VP, Russell RI (1974) The role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of postvagotomy diarrhoea. Br J Surg 61:516–518PubMedCrossRef Allan JG, Gerskowitch VP, Russell RI (1974) The role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of postvagotomy diarrhoea. Br J Surg 61:516–518PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ladas SD, Isaacs PE, Quereshi Y et al (1983) Role of the small intestine in postvagotomy diarrhea. Gastroenterology 85:1088–1093PubMed Ladas SD, Isaacs PE, Quereshi Y et al (1983) Role of the small intestine in postvagotomy diarrhea. Gastroenterology 85:1088–1093PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Okusa Y et al (1999) Improved physical condition by limiting lymphadenectomy around the coeliac artery after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Acta Chir 165:123–132CrossRef Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Okusa Y et al (1999) Improved physical condition by limiting lymphadenectomy around the coeliac artery after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Acta Chir 165:123–132CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH et al (2012) What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 26:1539–1547PubMedCrossRef Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH et al (2012) What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 26:1539–1547PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M et al (2012) A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer 15:198–205PubMedCrossRef Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M et al (2012) A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer 15:198–205PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH et al (2008) Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 248:721–727PubMedCrossRef Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH et al (2008) Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 248:721–727PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Matsushita T, Matsushima E, Maruyama M (2004) Assessment of peri-operative quality of life in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:319–325PubMedCrossRef Matsushita T, Matsushima E, Maruyama M (2004) Assessment of peri-operative quality of life in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:319–325PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy in Early Gastric Cancer
Authors
Ji Yeon Park
Bang Wool Eom
Min Jung Jo
Hong Man Yoon
Keun Won Ryu
Young-Woo Kim
Byung-Ho Nam
Jun Ho Lee
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2390-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

World Journal of Surgery 5/2014 Go to the issue