Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 6/2023

Open Access 12-09-2023 | Galcanezumab | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Galcanezumab Efficacy Through the Dosing Interval in Japanese Patients with Episodic Migraine: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial

Authors: Mamoru Shibata, Atsuko Nihira, Yuka Tanji, Akichika Ozeki, Hideyuki Imagawa, Mika Komori

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as a preventive treatment in Japanese patients with episodic migraine was demonstrated in a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (conducted December 2016–January 2019). This post hoc analysis assessed the consistency of galcanezumab efficacy through the monthly dosing interval.

Methods

Patients with 4–14 migraine headache days/month were randomized (2:1:1, stratified by baseline migraine frequency) to subcutaneous placebo (n = 230), 120-mg galcanezumab (with 240-mg loading dose; n = 115) or 240-mg galcanezumab (n = 114) once monthly for 6 months. Outcomes included change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with migraine headache on each day, and proportion of patients with worsening migraine headache days during each month ([average of weeks 3–4] − [average of weeks 1–2] > 0).

Results

In the 120-mg (approved dose) galcanezumab group, mean change from baseline in weekly migraine headache days was consistent and significantly greater (p < 0.05) than placebo for weeks 1–4; efficacy was consistent when averaged across months 1–6 and in most individual months. Averaged across months 1–6, the proportion of patients with migraine headache was significantly lower with galcanezumab than placebo on every day in both dose groups and was not significantly different between days 2 and 28 with 120-mg galcanezumab (p = 0.161). Within each month, the proportion of patients with migraine headache was generally consistent from days 2–28. The proportion of patients with worsening during the dosing interval did not significantly exceed 50% in any group during any month.

Conclusions

This post hoc analysis supports the consistency of efficacy of galcanezumab across 6 months of treatment and suggests that wearing-off within the dosing interval does not occur on a population level in Japanese patients with episodic migraine.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02959177.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:307–15.CrossRefPubMed Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:307–15.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hirata K, Ueda K, Komori M, et al. Comprehensive population-based survey of migraine in Japan: results of the ObserVational Survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME [Japan]) study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(11):1945–55.CrossRefPubMed Hirata K, Ueda K, Komori M, et al. Comprehensive population-based survey of migraine in Japan: results of the ObserVational Survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment, and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME [Japan]) study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(11):1945–55.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9.CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Nicholson RA, Reed ML, et al. Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache. 2022;62(2):122–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lipton RB, Nicholson RA, Reed ML, et al. Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache. 2022;62(2):122–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II). Headache. 2013;53(4):644–55.CrossRefPubMed Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II). Headache. 2013;53(4):644–55.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Meyers JL, Davis KL, Lenz RA, Sakai F, Xue F. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with migraine in Japan: a retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(12):1518–34.CrossRefPubMed Meyers JL, Davis KL, Lenz RA, Sakai F, Xue F. Treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with migraine in Japan: a retrospective analysis of health insurance claims data. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(12):1518–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ueda K, Ye W, Lombard L, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes in episodic and chronic migraine in Japan: analysis of data from the Adelphi migraine disease specific programme. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueda K, Ye W, Lombard L, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes in episodic and chronic migraine in Japan: analysis of data from the Adelphi migraine disease specific programme. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(1):22–33.PubMed Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF. Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(1):22–33.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Vécsei L, Majláth Z, Szok D, Csáti A, Tajti J. Drug safety and tolerability in prophylactic migraine treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(5):667–81.CrossRefPubMed Vécsei L, Majláth Z, Szok D, Csáti A, Tajti J. Drug safety and tolerability in prophylactic migraine treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(5):667–81.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Araki N, Takeshima T, Ando N, et al. Clinical practice guideline for chronic headache 2013. Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2019;7(5):231–59.CrossRef Araki N, Takeshima T, Ando N, et al. Clinical practice guideline for chronic headache 2013. Neurol Clin Neurosci. 2019;7(5):231–59.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Spierings ELH, Scherer JC, Sweeney SP, Grayzel DS. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):885–92.CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Spierings ELH, Scherer JC, Sweeney SP, Grayzel DS. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):885–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Mulleners WM, Kim B-K, Láinez MJA, et al. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(10):814–25.CrossRefPubMed Mulleners WM, Kim B-K, Láinez MJA, et al. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(10):814–25.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sakai F, Ozeki A, Skljarevski V. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: a phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia Rep. 2020;3:1–10. Sakai F, Ozeki A, Skljarevski V. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: a phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia Rep. 2020;3:1–10.
17.
go back to reference Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim B-K, Yang J-Y. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442–54.CrossRefPubMed Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim B-K, Yang J-Y. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442–54.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Blumenfeld AM, Halker Singh RB, et al. Post hoc analysis of clinical trial data and pharmacokinetic data to assess wearing-off of erenumab within monthly treatment cycle. Headache. 2023;63(2):233–42.CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Blumenfeld AM, Halker Singh RB, et al. Post hoc analysis of clinical trial data and pharmacokinetic data to assess wearing-off of erenumab within monthly treatment cycle. Headache. 2023;63(2):233–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Restrepo S. Wearing off in CGRP fremanezumab-VFRM and galcanezumab-GNLM. Headache. 2020;60(S1):1–156. Restrepo S. Wearing off in CGRP fremanezumab-VFRM and galcanezumab-GNLM. Headache. 2020;60(S1):1–156.
21.
go back to reference Robblee J, Devick KL, Mendez N, Potter J, Slonaker J, Starling AJ. Real-world patient experience with erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Headache. 2020;60(9):2014–25.CrossRefPubMed Robblee J, Devick KL, Mendez N, Potter J, Slonaker J, Starling AJ. Real-world patient experience with erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Headache. 2020;60(9):2014–25.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ailani J, Kuruppu DK, Rettiganti M, et al. Does “wearing off” of efficacy occur in galcanezumab-treated patients at the end of the monthly treatment cycle? Post hoc analyses of four phase III randomized trials. Headache. 2022;62(2):198–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ailani J, Kuruppu DK, Rettiganti M, et al. Does “wearing off” of efficacy occur in galcanezumab-treated patients at the end of the monthly treatment cycle? Post hoc analyses of four phase III randomized trials. Headache. 2022;62(2):198–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Pozo-Rosich P, Samaan KH, Schwedt TJ, Nicholson RA, Rettiganti M, Pearlman EM. Galcanezumab provides consistent efficacy throughout the dosing interval among patients with episodic and chronic migraine: a post hoc analysis. Adv Ther. 2021;38(6):3154–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pozo-Rosich P, Samaan KH, Schwedt TJ, Nicholson RA, Rettiganti M, Pearlman EM. Galcanezumab provides consistent efficacy throughout the dosing interval among patients with episodic and chronic migraine: a post hoc analysis. Adv Ther. 2021;38(6):3154–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Stevanovic DM, Ortega M, et al. No “wearing-off effect” seen in quarterly or monthly dosing of fremanezumab: subanalysis of a randomized long-term study. Headache. 2020;60(10):2431–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blumenfeld AM, Stevanovic DM, Ortega M, et al. No “wearing-off effect” seen in quarterly or monthly dosing of fremanezumab: subanalysis of a randomized long-term study. Headache. 2020;60(10):2431–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference EMGALITY® (galcanezumab) [package insert]. Kobe, Japan: Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; 2021. EMGALITY® (galcanezumab) [package insert]. Kobe, Japan: Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; 2021.
26.
go back to reference Igarashi H, Shibata M, Ozeki A, Day KA, Matsumura T. Early onset and maintenance effect of galcanezumab in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3555–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Igarashi H, Shibata M, Ozeki A, Day KA, Matsumura T. Early onset and maintenance effect of galcanezumab in Japanese patients with episodic migraine. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3555–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.CrossRef Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Igarashi H, Shibata M, Ozeki A, Matsumura T. Galcanezumab effects on migraine severity and symptoms in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: secondary analysis of a phase 2 randomized trial. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(1):73–87.CrossRefPubMed Igarashi H, Shibata M, Ozeki A, Matsumura T. Galcanezumab effects on migraine severity and symptoms in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: secondary analysis of a phase 2 randomized trial. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(1):73–87.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hirata K, Takeshima T, Sakai F, et al. A long-term open-label safety study of galcanezumab in Japanese patients with migraine. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021;20(6):721–33.CrossRefPubMed Hirata K, Takeshima T, Sakai F, et al. A long-term open-label safety study of galcanezumab in Japanese patients with migraine. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021;20(6):721–33.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Camporeale A, Kudrow D, Sides R, et al. A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with migraine. BMC Neurol. 2018;18:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Camporeale A, Kudrow D, Sides R, et al. A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with migraine. BMC Neurol. 2018;18:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Pozo-Rosich P, Detke HC, Wang S, et al. Long-term treatment with galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: results from the open-label extension of the REGAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(5):731–42.CrossRefPubMed Pozo-Rosich P, Detke HC, Wang S, et al. Long-term treatment with galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine: results from the open-label extension of the REGAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(5):731–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Galcanezumab Efficacy Through the Dosing Interval in Japanese Patients with Episodic Migraine: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial
Authors
Mamoru Shibata
Atsuko Nihira
Yuka Tanji
Akichika Ozeki
Hideyuki Imagawa
Mika Komori
Publication date
12-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00534-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Neurology and Therapy 6/2023 Go to the issue