Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 6/2023

Open Access 08-09-2023 | Multiple Sclerosis | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Treatment Patterns and Unmet Need for Patients with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Survey Results from 2016 to 2021

Authors: Crystal Watson, Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai, Arie Barlev, Eddie Jones, Sasha Bogdanovich, Kiren Kresa-Reahl

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Much of the current literature on treatment patterns and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) does not distinguish between the relapsing–remitting and progressive subtypes (including primary [PPMS] and secondary progressive MS [SPMS]), or between active/nonactive disease. Current treatment options for progressive MS are limited, with only one approved product for PPMS and none specifically for nonactive SPMS. Here we report treatment patterns, disability progression, and unmet needs among patients with active and nonactive PPMS and SPMS.

Methods

The annual, cross-sectional survey from the Adelphi Disease Specific Program was used to collect physician-reported data on US adult patients with PPMS and SPMS, including active and nonactive disease. Treatment patterns (including the proportion of patients who were untreated with a disease-modifying therapy [DMT]), disability progression, and unmet need are described from 2016 to 2021.

Results

Data were collected for 2067 patients with progressive MS (PPMS, 1583; SPMS, 484). A substantial proportion of patients were untreated across all groups, and this was highest for nonactive PPMS (~ 43%). The proportion of untreated patients generally declined over time but remained high in 2018–2021 (~ 10–38%). Among treated patients, the proportion receiving infusions increased over time to ~ 34–46%, largely driven by ocrelizumab use after approval. Disability progression was reported for most patients (> 50%), including many who were receiving a DMT. Across all disease subtypes, when physicians were asked about the greatest unmet need with current DMTs, they most frequently cited effectiveness (~ 63–87%), and specifically slowing disease progression (~ 32–59%).

Conclusions

This analysis of physician-reported data reveals that patients with progressive MS, particularly those with nonactive disease, frequently remain untreated or continue to decline despite treatment with available DMTs. Thus there is an enduring need for safe and effective treatments for this underserved population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Campbell JD, et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology. 2019;92(10):e1029–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wallin MT, Culpepper WJ, Campbell JD, et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology. 2019;92(10):e1029–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Damotte V, Lizee A, Tremblay M, et al. Harnessing electronic medical records to advance research on multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019;25(3):408–18.PubMedCrossRef Damotte V, Lizee A, Tremblay M, et al. Harnessing electronic medical records to advance research on multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019;25(3):408–18.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gross HJ, Watson C. Characteristics, burden of illness, and physical functioning of patients with relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional US survey. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:1349–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gross HJ, Watson C. Characteristics, burden of illness, and physical functioning of patients with relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional US survey. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:1349–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Vivek V, Jokubaitis V, et al. Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 12):3609–17.PubMedCrossRef Kalincik T, Vivek V, Jokubaitis V, et al. Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 12):3609–17.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kister I, Chamot E, Cutter G, et al. Increasing age at disability milestones among MS patients in the MSBase Registry. J Neurol Sci. 2012;318(1–2):94–9.PubMedCrossRef Kister I, Chamot E, Cutter G, et al. Increasing age at disability milestones among MS patients in the MSBase Registry. J Neurol Sci. 2012;318(1–2):94–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nazareth TA, Rava AR, Polyakov JL, et al. Relapse prevalence, symptoms, and health care engagement: patient insights from the Multiple Sclerosis in America 2017 survey. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;26:219–34.PubMedCrossRef Nazareth TA, Rava AR, Polyakov JL, et al. Relapse prevalence, symptoms, and health care engagement: patient insights from the Multiple Sclerosis in America 2017 survey. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;26:219–34.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tintore M, Alexander M, Costello K, et al. The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:33–45.PubMedCrossRef Tintore M, Alexander M, Costello K, et al. The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:33–45.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Claflin SB, Stankovich J, et al. Redefining the multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS): the effect of sex and onset phenotype. Mult Scler. 2020;26(13):1765–74.PubMedCrossRef Zhou Y, Claflin SB, Stankovich J, et al. Redefining the multiple sclerosis severity score (MSSS): the effect of sex and onset phenotype. Mult Scler. 2020;26(13):1765–74.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Capkun G, Dahlke F, Lahoz R, et al. Mortality and comorbidities in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with a population without multiple sclerosis: an observational study using the US Department of Defense administrative claims database. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(6):546–54.PubMedCrossRef Capkun G, Dahlke F, Lahoz R, et al. Mortality and comorbidities in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with a population without multiple sclerosis: an observational study using the US Department of Defense administrative claims database. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4(6):546–54.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Claflin SB, Broadley S, Taylor BV. The effect of disease modifying therapies on disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic overview of meta-analyses. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1150.PubMedCrossRef Claflin SB, Broadley S, Taylor BV. The effect of disease modifying therapies on disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic overview of meta-analyses. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1150.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Carrithers MD. Update on disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2014;36(12):1938–45.PubMedCrossRef Carrithers MD. Update on disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2014;36(12):1938–45.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cree BA, Hartung HP. Steering through complexity: management approaches in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(3):263–71.PubMedCrossRef Cree BA, Hartung HP. Steering through complexity: management approaches in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(3):263–71.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;376(3):209–20.PubMedCrossRef Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;376(3):209–20.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mills EA, Begay JA, Fisher C, Mao-Draayer Y. Impact of trial design and patient heterogeneity on the identification of clinically effective therapies for progressive MS. Mult Scler. 2018;24(14):1795–807.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mills EA, Begay JA, Fisher C, Mao-Draayer Y. Impact of trial design and patient heterogeneity on the identification of clinically effective therapies for progressive MS. Mult Scler. 2018;24(14):1795–807.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wolinsky JS, Arnold DL, Brochet B, et al. Long-term follow-up from the ORATORIO trial of ocrelizumab for primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a post-hoc analysis from the ongoing open-label extension of the randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(12):998–1009.PubMedCrossRef Wolinsky JS, Arnold DL, Brochet B, et al. Long-term follow-up from the ORATORIO trial of ocrelizumab for primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a post-hoc analysis from the ongoing open-label extension of the randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(12):998–1009.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hartung H-P, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9350):2018–25.PubMedCrossRef Hartung H-P, Gonsette R, Konig N, et al. Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9350):2018–25.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Krapf H, Morrissey SP, Zenker O, Zwingers T, Gonsette R, Hartung H-P. Effect of mitoxantrone on MRI in progressive MS: results of the MIMS trial. Neurology. 2005;65(5):690–5.PubMedCrossRef Krapf H, Morrissey SP, Zenker O, Zwingers T, Gonsette R, Hartung H-P. Effect of mitoxantrone on MRI in progressive MS: results of the MIMS trial. Neurology. 2005;65(5):690–5.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Martinelli V, Radaelli M, Straffi L, Rodegher M, Comi G. Mitoxantrone: benefits and risks in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Sci. 2009;30(Suppl 2):S167–70.PubMedCrossRef Martinelli V, Radaelli M, Straffi L, Rodegher M, Comi G. Mitoxantrone: benefits and risks in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Sci. 2009;30(Suppl 2):S167–70.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kappos L, Bar-Or A, Cree BAC, et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1263–73.PubMedCrossRef Kappos L, Bar-Or A, Cree BAC, et al. Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1263–73.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gold R, Piani-Meier D, Kappos L, et al. Siponimod vs placebo in active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis from the phase 3 EXPAND study. J Neurol. 2022;269(9):5093–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gold R, Piani-Meier D, Kappos L, et al. Siponimod vs placebo in active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis from the phase 3 EXPAND study. J Neurol. 2022;269(9):5093–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tintore M, Vidal-Jordana A, Sastre-Garriga J. Treatment of multiple sclerosis - success from bench to bedside. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(1):53–8.PubMedCrossRef Tintore M, Vidal-Jordana A, Sastre-Garriga J. Treatment of multiple sclerosis - success from bench to bedside. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(1):53–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bogosian A, Morgan M, Moss-Morris R. Multiple challenges for people after transitioning to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3): e026421.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bogosian A, Morgan M, Moss-Morris R. Multiple challenges for people after transitioning to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3): e026421.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bowen J, Mehta R, Pelletier C, et al. Treatment patterns among patients with multiple sclerosis initiating second-line disease-modifying therapy. Adv Ther. 2020;37(7):3163–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bowen J, Mehta R, Pelletier C, et al. Treatment patterns among patients with multiple sclerosis initiating second-line disease-modifying therapy. Adv Ther. 2020;37(7):3163–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fernandez-Diaz E, Perez-Vicente JA, Villaverde-Gonzalez R, et al. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in a Spanish population. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(2):385–94.PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Diaz E, Perez-Vicente JA, Villaverde-Gonzalez R, et al. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in a Spanish population. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8(2):385–94.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lepore V, Bosetti C, Santucci C, Iaffaldano P, Trojano M, Mosconi P. Detection of disability worsening in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a real-world roving Expanded Disability Status Scale reference analysis from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(2):567–78.PubMedCrossRef Lepore V, Bosetti C, Santucci C, Iaffaldano P, Trojano M, Mosconi P. Detection of disability worsening in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a real-world roving Expanded Disability Status Scale reference analysis from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(2):567–78.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Wiendl H, Spelman T, Butzkueven H, et al. Real-world disability improvement in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab in the Tysabri Observational Program. Mult Scler. 2021;27(5):719–28.PubMedCrossRef Wiendl H, Spelman T, Butzkueven H, et al. Real-world disability improvement in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab in the Tysabri Observational Program. Mult Scler. 2021;27(5):719–28.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chataway J, Murphy N, Khurana V, Schofield H, Findlay J, Adlard N. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of costs and health state utilities. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(6):995–1004.PubMedCrossRef Chataway J, Murphy N, Khurana V, Schofield H, Findlay J, Adlard N. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of costs and health state utilities. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(6):995–1004.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Anderson P, Benford M, Harris N, Karavali M, Piercy J. Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: disease-specific programmes - a means to understand. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(11):3063–72.PubMedCrossRef Anderson P, Benford M, Harris N, Karavali M, Piercy J. Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: disease-specific programmes - a means to understand. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(11):3063–72.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Neuberger EE, Abbass IM, Jones E, Engmann NJ. Work productivity outcomes associated with ocrelizumab compared with other disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Ther. 2021;10(1):183–96.PubMedCrossRef Neuberger EE, Abbass IM, Jones E, Engmann NJ. Work productivity outcomes associated with ocrelizumab compared with other disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Ther. 2021;10(1):183–96.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Baldassari LE, Fox RJ. Therapeutic advances and challenges in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. Drugs. 2018;78(15):1549–66.PubMedCrossRef Baldassari LE, Fox RJ. Therapeutic advances and challenges in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. Drugs. 2018;78(15):1549–66.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Faissner S, Plemel JR, Gold R, Yong VW. Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(12):905–22.CrossRef Faissner S, Plemel JR, Gold R, Yong VW. Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(12):905–22.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Glanz BI, Greeke E, LaRussa A, et al. Risk attitudes and risk perceptions in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2016;2:2055217316665406.PubMedPubMedCentral Glanz BI, Greeke E, LaRussa A, et al. Risk attitudes and risk perceptions in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2016;2:2055217316665406.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Gil-González I, Martín-Rodríguez A, Conrad R, Pérez-San-Gregorio M. Quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11): e041249.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gil-González I, Martín-Rodríguez A, Conrad R, Pérez-San-Gregorio M. Quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11): e041249.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Naegelin Y, Naegelin P, von Felten S, et al. Association of rituximab treatment with disability progression among patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):274–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Naegelin Y, Naegelin P, von Felten S, et al. Association of rituximab treatment with disability progression among patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):274–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Vermersch P, Brieva-Ruiz L, Fox RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of masitinib in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis: a randomized, phase 3, clinical trial. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;9(3):e1148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vermersch P, Brieva-Ruiz L, Fox RJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of masitinib in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis: a randomized, phase 3, clinical trial. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;9(3):e1148.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hollen CW, Paz Soldán MM, Rinker JR 2nd, Spain RI. The future of progressive multiple sclerosis therapies. Fed Pract. 2020;37(Suppl 1):S43–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Hollen CW, Paz Soldán MM, Rinker JR 2nd, Spain RI. The future of progressive multiple sclerosis therapies. Fed Pract. 2020;37(Suppl 1):S43–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Filipi ML, Beavin J, Brillante RT, et al. Nurses’ perspective on approaches to limit flu-like symptoms during interferon therapy for multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16(1):55–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Filipi ML, Beavin J, Brillante RT, et al. Nurses’ perspective on approaches to limit flu-like symptoms during interferon therapy for multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16(1):55–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Halper J, Centonze D, Newsome SD, et al. Management strategies for flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions associated with peginterferon beta-1a: obtaining recommendations using the Delphi Technique. Int J MS Care. 2016;18(4):211–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Halper J, Centonze D, Newsome SD, et al. Management strategies for flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions associated with peginterferon beta-1a: obtaining recommendations using the Delphi Technique. Int J MS Care. 2016;18(4):211–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Simpson D, Noble S, Perry C. Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2002;16(12):825–50.PubMedCrossRef Simpson D, Noble S, Perry C. Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2002;16(12):825–50.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest. 2020;158(1s):S65-71.PubMedCrossRef Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest. 2020;158(1s):S65-71.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Amezcua L, McCauley JL. Race and ethnicity on MS presentation and disease course. Mult Scler J. 2020;26(5):561–7.CrossRef Amezcua L, McCauley JL. Race and ethnicity on MS presentation and disease course. Mult Scler J. 2020;26(5):561–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment Patterns and Unmet Need for Patients with Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Survey Results from 2016 to 2021
Authors
Crystal Watson
Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai
Arie Barlev
Eddie Jones
Sasha Bogdanovich
Kiren Kresa-Reahl
Publication date
08-09-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00532-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Neurology and Therapy 6/2023 Go to the issue