Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Food and Drug Administration approvals in phase 3 Cancer clinical trials

Authors: Joseph Abi Jaoude, Ramez Kouzy, Marc Ghabach, Roshal Patel, Dario Pasalic, Elie Ghossain, Austin B. Miller, Timothy A. Lin, Vivek Verma, C. David Fuller, Vivek Subbiah, Bruce D. Minsky, Ethan B. Ludmir, Cullen M. Taniguchi

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Phase 3 oncologic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) can lead to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals. In this study, we aim to identify trial-related factors associated with trials leading to subsequent FDA drug approvals.

Methods

We performed a database query through the ClinicalTrials.gov registry to search for oncologic phase 3 RCTs on February 2020. We screened all trials for therapeutic, cancer-specific, phase 3, randomized, multi-arm trials. We then identified whether a trial was used for subsequent FDA drug approval through screening of FDA approval announcements.

Results

In total, 790 trials were included in our study, with 225 trials (28.4%) generating data that were subsequently used for FDA approvals. Of the 225 FDA approvals identified, 65 (28.9%) were based on trials assessing overall survival (OS) as a primary endpoint (PEP), two (0.9%) were based on trials with a quality of life (QoL) PEP, and 158 approvals (70.2%) were based on trials with other PEP (P = 0.01). FDA approvals were more common among industry funded-trials (219, 97.3%; P < 0.001), and less common among trials sponsored by national cooperative groups (21, 9.3%; P < 0.001). Finally, increased pre-hoc power and meeting patients’ accrual target were associated with FDA approvals (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The majority of FDA approvals are based on data generated from trials analyzing surrogate primary endpoints and trials receiving industry funding. Additional studies are required to understand the complexity of FDA approvals.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Ludmir EB, Mainwaring W, Lin TA, Miller AB, Jethanandani A, Espinoza AF, et al. Factors associated with age disparities among cancer clinical trial participants. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1769–73.CrossRefPubMed Ludmir EB, Mainwaring W, Lin TA, Miller AB, Jethanandani A, Espinoza AF, et al. Factors associated with age disparities among cancer clinical trial participants. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:1769–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Food and Drug Administration approvals in phase 3 Cancer clinical trials
Authors
Joseph Abi Jaoude
Ramez Kouzy
Marc Ghabach
Roshal Patel
Dario Pasalic
Elie Ghossain
Austin B. Miller
Timothy A. Lin
Vivek Verma
C. David Fuller
Vivek Subbiah
Bruce D. Minsky
Ethan B. Ludmir
Cullen M. Taniguchi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08457-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine