Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2007

01-12-2007 | Original Paper

Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate

Authors: Daniele Andreini, Gianluca Pontone, Giovanni Ballerini, Carlo Quaglia, Enrica Nobili, Alessandra Magini, Erika Bertella, Mauro Pepi

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary (MDCT) angiography applied to an unselected heart-disease population, to identify all causes of unfeasibility of exams, the distribution of artifacts in every coronary segment and their influence on diagnostic accuracy of examination.

Materials and methods

We evaluated 500 patients with different indications for invasive coronary angiography. All underwent coronary MDCT and ICA. 215 patients were pre-treated with metoprolol intravenously. In the whole population we studied native coronary arteries and in 141 cases the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). The quality of MDCT images was graded as good, sufficient and insufficient.

Results

We were able to evaluate the patency of all grafts, with the exception of 4 cases. Diagnostic accuracy of CABG evaluation was very high (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.4%). In native coronary arteries the overall feasibility was 97.9%. The middle left circumflex artery, right coronary artery and posterior descending artery were the segments most often poorly visualized. The first cause of artifacts was misalignment related to high heart rate, followed by premature heart beats and calcified plaque. The population was separated into 3 groups: group 1: heart rate <55 bpm, group 2: 55–65 bpm, group 3: >65 bpm. In group 1, misalignment was significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3. On a segment-based analysis, overall feasibility was therefore significantly higher in group 1 vs group 2 and vs group 3. Images of good quality were significantly higher in group 1 (95.4%) than in group 2 (87%) and group 3 (71.8%). The higher image quality in group 1 impacts on the overall diagnostic accuracy of the exam. Indeed overall sensitivity is significantly higher in group 1 (89.5%) than in group 2 (86%) and group 3 (82.8%) and overall specificity is significantly higher in group 1 than in group 3.

Conclusions

Multidetector computed tomography has a high feasibility and diagnostic accuracy for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in an unselected population. Good patient preparation (optimized beta-blocker therapy, correct breathing instructions) is essential for evaluating native coronary arteries while preparation with a beta-blocker is less relevant in bypass graft patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audet A et al (1999) Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824PubMedCrossRef Scanlon P, Faxon D, Audet A et al (1999) Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB et al (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170–2214PubMedCrossRef Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB et al (2001) American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170–2214PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoffmann U, Hadvar J, Dunn E (2004) Is CT angiography ready for prime time? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(suppl A):312ACrossRef Hoffmann U, Hadvar J, Dunn E (2004) Is CT angiography ready for prime time? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(suppl A):312ACrossRef
4.
go back to reference Traversi E, Bertoli G, Barazzoni G et al (2004) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computer tomography. Technology, methods, preliminary experience and prospects. Ital Heart J 5(2):89–98PubMed Traversi E, Bertoli G, Barazzoni G et al (2004) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computer tomography. Technology, methods, preliminary experience and prospects. Ital Heart J 5(2):89–98PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMedCrossRef Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107: 664–666PubMedCrossRef Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107: 664–666PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 2265–2270PubMedCrossRef Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al (2004) Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 2265–2270PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kuetter A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 831–839CrossRef Kuetter A, Kopp AF, Schroeder S et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 831–839CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1241–1247PubMedCrossRef Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1241–1247PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Achembach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U et al (2004) Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:842–847CrossRef Achembach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U et al (2004) Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:842–847CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury R et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. Circulation 110:2638–2643PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury R et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. Circulation 110:2638–2643PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Marano R, Luccichenti G et al (2004) Anatomia normale del circolo coronarico con tomografia computerizzata multistrato a 16 canali. Radiol Med 107:11–23 Cademartiri F, Marano R, Luccichenti G et al (2004) Anatomia normale del circolo coronarico con tomografia computerizzata multistrato a 16 canali. Radiol Med 107:11–23
13.
go back to reference Desjardins B, Kazerooni EA (2004) ECG-gated cardiac CT. AJR 182:993–1010PubMed Desjardins B, Kazerooni EA (2004) ECG-gated cardiac CT. AJR 182:993–1010PubMed
14.
go back to reference Achamnbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography. Circulation 109:14–17CrossRef Achamnbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography. Circulation 109:14–17CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients European Heart Journal 23:1714–1725 Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Kuettner A et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients European Heart Journal 23:1714–1725
16.
go back to reference Ferencik M, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2003) Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. Am J Cardiol 92:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef Ferencik M, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2003) Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. Am J Cardiol 92:1257–1262PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography. Experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26:106PubMedCrossRef Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Kuettner A et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography. Experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26:106PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovascular Imaging 22:101–105CrossRef Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovascular Imaging 22:101–105CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for grading of coronary artery disease, Council of Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:35–40 Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for grading of coronary artery disease, Council of Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:35–40
20.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M et al (2000) Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 216:718–723PubMed Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M et al (2000) Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 216:718–723PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol 14:178–183PubMedCrossRef Cademartiri F, Mollet N, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Non-invasive 16-row multislice CT coronary angiography: usefulness of saline chaser. Eur Radiol 14:178–183PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Garcia MJ, Lessick J (2006) Hoffmann MHK for the CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411PubMedCrossRef Garcia MJ, Lessick J (2006) Hoffmann MHK for the CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296:403–411PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sung SS, Yookyung K, Soo Mee L (2005) Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 84:649–654 Sung SS, Yookyung K, Soo Mee L (2005) Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR 84:649–654
24.
go back to reference Singh BN (2005) Beta-Adrenergic blockers as antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory compounds: an overview. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 10(Suppl 1):S3–S14PubMedCrossRef Singh BN (2005) Beta-Adrenergic blockers as antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory compounds: an overview. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 10(Suppl 1):S3–S14PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haverkamp V, Hindriks G, Gulker H (1990) Antiarrhythmic properties of beta-blockers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 16(Suppl 5):S29–S32, ReviewPubMed Haverkamp V, Hindriks G, Gulker H (1990) Antiarrhythmic properties of beta-blockers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 16(Suppl 5):S29–S32, ReviewPubMed
26.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57(3):331–335PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57(3):331–335PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Evaluation of Venous and Arterial Conduit Patency by 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography. Circulation 110:3234–3238PubMedCrossRef Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Evaluation of Venous and Arterial Conduit Patency by 16-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography. Circulation 110:3234–3238PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ et al (1980) Detection of patent artery bypass grafts by computed tomography: a preliminary report. Circulation 61:826–831PubMed Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ et al (1980) Detection of patent artery bypass grafts by computed tomography: a preliminary report. Circulation 61:826–831PubMed
29.
go back to reference Salm LP, Bax J, Jukem JW et al (2005) Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 150:775–781PubMedCrossRef Salm LP, Bax J, Jukem JW et al (2005) Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 150:775–781PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al. (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88(7):792–795PubMedCrossRef Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E et al. (2001) Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88(7):792–795PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M et al. (2006) Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDTC) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 57(3):336–344PubMedCrossRef Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M et al. (2006) Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDTC) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 57(3):336–344PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N et al (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 14:1353–1362 Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N et al (2004) Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 14:1353–1362
33.
go back to reference Rossi R, Chiurlia E, Ratti C et al (2004) Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ital Heart J 5(1):36–41PubMed Rossi R, Chiurlia E, Ratti C et al (2004) Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ital Heart J 5(1):36–41PubMed
34.
go back to reference Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M et al (2006) American College of cardiology foundation quality strategic directions committee appropriateness criteria working group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497 Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M et al (2006) American College of cardiology foundation quality strategic directions committee appropriateness criteria working group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate
Authors
Daniele Andreini
Gianluca Pontone
Giovanni Ballerini
Carlo Quaglia
Enrica Nobili
Alessandra Magini
Erika Bertella
Mauro Pepi
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9217-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 6/2007 Go to the issue