Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008

01-02-2008

Evaluation of warfarin prescription labels

Authors: S. Jacob, A. Jacobson, R. Alwan, C. Miller

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Excerpt

Introduction Due to warfarin’s frequent dosage adjustments and the potential for serious adverse consequences (bleeding, bruising, etc.), the dosage must be individualized for each patient according to the indication for therapy and patient response to the medication as measured by prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR). Ideally when there are dosing changes, the dosing instructions written on the prescription label should be the same as the patient’s actual dosage regimen. Patients may take incorrect warfarin doses secondary to having incorrect directions on the prescription label, which may lead to adverse events. Dosage instructions may not be reissued for each difference in dosage to save time, avoid waste of multiple bottles of medication, and to reduce cost. Objective To ascertain whether a discrepancy exists between the warfarin dosage listed on the prescription bottle label dispensed from the pharmacy and the patients’ actual dosage instruction obtained from the anticoagulation clinic at the Loma Linda VA Medical Center, and if the discrepancy existed, to determine its magnitude. If discrepancies existed, examine if there was a >10% difference in the weekly dose. Method A retrospective chart review utilizing an MS DOS based program Clinstat for randomization scheme of 300 charts was carried out of patients 18 years or older with active management of anticoagulation and received warfarin prescription from Loma Linda VA Medical Center between May 1,2005 and December 1, 2005. Results Of the 298 charts, which met inclusion criteria, 12 (4%) were unable to be assessed due to lack of patient’s inability to recall warfarin dosage documented in chart. Of the remaining 286, the mean age was 69.8 and males constituted 98.9%. Discrepancy was noted in 161 charts (56%). Of those, 122 (76%) had a >10% discrepancy: with a mean of 32%, and range of 11–100%. Conclusion/Discussion The results of the warfarin label retrospective review demonstrated that there was a discrepancy between patient’s prescription bottle label and patient’s verbalized dosage in over half of the patients’ from the anticoagulation clinic with a mean discrepancy of 32% of the warfarin dose and 76% of the discrepancies exceeding 10% of the warfarin dose. This study raises a question whether warfarin labels should simply read, “take as directed,” or with the specific dosing instructions provided on a separate instruction sheet or calendar. This study may also be significant to fuel future studies to look into the greater impact of this discrepancy such as patient safety (bleeding rates, hospitalization rates), and cost (new labels, medication waste). …
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of warfarin prescription labels
Authors
S. Jacob
A. Jacobson
R. Alwan
C. Miller
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0122-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.