Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Paediatric Neuroradiology

Evaluation of the use of automatic exposure control and automatic tube potential selection in low-dose cerebrospinal fluid shunt head CT

Authors: Adam N. Wallace, Ross Vyhmeister, Swapnil Bagade, Arindam Chatterjee, Brandon Hicks, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Robert C. McKinstry

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Cerebrospinal fluid shunts are primarily used for the treatment of hydrocephalus. Shunt complications may necessitate multiple non-contrast head CT scans resulting in potentially high levels of radiation dose starting at an early age. A new head CT protocol using automatic exposure control and automated tube potential selection has been implemented at our institution to reduce radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reduction in radiation dose achieved by this protocol compared with a protocol with fixed parameters.

Methods

A retrospective sample of 60 non-contrast head CT scans assessing for cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction was identified, 30 of which were performed with each protocol. The radiation doses of the two protocols were compared using the volume CT dose index and dose length product. The diagnostic acceptability and quality of each scan were evaluated by three independent readers.

Results

The new protocol lowered the average volume CT dose index from 15.2 to 9.2 mGy representing a 39 % reduction (P < 0.01; 95 % CI 35–44 %) and lowered the dose length product from 259.5 to 151.2 mGy/cm representing a 42 % reduction (P < 0.01; 95 % CI 34–50 %). The new protocol produced diagnostically acceptable scans with comparable image quality to the fixed parameter protocol.

Conclusion

A pediatric shunt non-contrast head CT protocol using automatic exposure control and automated tube potential selection reduced patient radiation dose compared with a fixed parameter protocol while producing diagnostic images of comparable quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bondurant CP, Jimenez DF (1995) Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 23(5):254–258, discussion 259CrossRefPubMed Bondurant CP, Jimenez DF (1995) Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 23(5):254–258, discussion 259CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(12)60815-0 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85(3):257–268PubMed Sim J, Wright CC (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85(3):257–268PubMed
6.
go back to reference Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112(4):951–957CrossRefPubMed Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112(4):951–957CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M, Tudorascu D, Small WC, Little S, Palasis S (2008) Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(4):802–806. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0923 CrossRefPubMed Udayasankar UK, Braithwaite K, Arvaniti M, Tudorascu D, Small WC, Little S, Palasis S (2008) Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(4):802–806. doi:10.​3174/​ajnr.​A0923 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, Howard P, Bae JM, terBrugge K (2009) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(9):1754–1759. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1675 CrossRefPubMed Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, Howard P, Bae JM, terBrugge K (2009) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(9):1754–1759. doi:10.​3174/​ajnr.​A1675 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ozdoba C, Slotboom J, Schroth G, Ulzheimer S, Kottke R, Watzal H, Weisstanner C (2014) Dose reduction in standard head CT: first results from a new scanner using iterative reconstruction and a new detector type in comparison with two previous generations of multi-slice CT. Clin Neuroradiol 24(1):23–28. doi:10.1007/s00062-013-0263-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ozdoba C, Slotboom J, Schroth G, Ulzheimer S, Kottke R, Watzal H, Weisstanner C (2014) Dose reduction in standard head CT: first results from a new scanner using iterative reconstruction and a new detector type in comparison with two previous generations of multi-slice CT. Clin Neuroradiol 24(1):23–28. doi:10.​1007/​s00062-013-0263-5 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference May MS, Kramer MR, Eller A, Wuest W, Scharf M, Brand M, Saake M, Schmidt B, Uder M, Lell MM (2014) Automated tube voltage adaptation in head and neck computed tomography between 120 and 100 kV: effects on image quality and radiation dose. Neuroradiology 56(9):797–803. doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1393-4 CrossRefPubMed May MS, Kramer MR, Eller A, Wuest W, Scharf M, Brand M, Saake M, Schmidt B, Uder M, Lell MM (2014) Automated tube voltage adaptation in head and neck computed tomography between 120 and 100 kV: effects on image quality and radiation dose. Neuroradiology 56(9):797–803. doi:10.​1007/​s00234-014-1393-4 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Korn A, Bender B, Fenchel M, Spira D, Schabel C, Thomas C, Flohr T, Claussen CD, Bhadelia R, Ernemann U, Brodoefel H (2013) Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. Eur J Radiol 82(9):1431–1435. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.011 CrossRefPubMed Korn A, Bender B, Fenchel M, Spira D, Schabel C, Thomas C, Flohr T, Claussen CD, Bhadelia R, Ernemann U, Brodoefel H (2013) Sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in head CT: improvement of objective and subjective image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. Eur J Radiol 82(9):1431–1435. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2013.​03.​011 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the use of automatic exposure control and automatic tube potential selection in low-dose cerebrospinal fluid shunt head CT
Authors
Adam N. Wallace
Ross Vyhmeister
Swapnil Bagade
Arindam Chatterjee
Brandon Hicks
Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo
Robert C. McKinstry
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1508-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Neuroradiology 6/2015 Go to the issue