Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Esophageal Cancer | Research article

Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study

Authors: Robert E. Merritt, Peter J. Kneuertz, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Desmond M. D’Souza, Kyle A. Perry

Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy (trimodality therapy). We compared the long-term oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (M-ILE) cohort with a propensity score weighted cohort of open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (O-ILE) cases after trimodality therapy.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of 223 patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by M-ILE or O-ILE from April 2009 to February 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment was used to balance the baseline characteristics between study groups. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated for overall survival and recurrence-free survival comparing the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine predictive variables for overall and recurrence-free survival.

Results

The IPTW cohort included patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent M-ILE (n = 142) or O-ILE (n = 68). The overall rate of postoperative adverse events was not significantly different after IPTW adjustment between the O-ILE and M-ILE trimodality groups (53.4% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.089). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the M-ILE group was 59.4% (95% CI: 49.8–67.8) compared to 55.7% (95% CI: 39.2–69.4) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.670). The 3-year recurrence-free survival for the M-ILE group was 59.9% (95% CI: 50.2–68.2) compared to 61.6% (95% CI: 41.9–76.3) for the O-ILE group (p = 0.357). A complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was significantly predictive of improved OS and RFS.

Conclusion

The overall and recurrence-free survival rates for M-ILE were not significantly different from O-ILE for esophageal carcinoma after trimodality therapy. Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation was predictive of improved overall and recurrence- free survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, Van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRef Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, Van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shapiro J, Van Lanshot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-tern results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRef Shapiro J, Van Lanshot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-tern results of a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(6):545–53.CrossRef Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(6):545–53.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Avendano CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, et al. Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:922–6.CrossRef Avendano CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, et al. Pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:922–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2416–22.CrossRef Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2416–22.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;1:95–102.CrossRef Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;1:95–102.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Biere SS, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bonavina K, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesopahgeal cancer: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized control trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92.CrossRef Biere SS, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bonavina K, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesopahgeal cancer: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized control trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klevebro F, Scandavini CM, Kamiya S, et al. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus of gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31:1–6.CrossRef Klevebro F, Scandavini CM, Kamiya S, et al. Single center consecutive series cohort study of minimally invasive versus open resection for cancer in the esophagus of gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31:1–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kauppi J, Rasanen J, Sihvo E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2614–9.CrossRef Kauppi J, Rasanen J, Sihvo E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2614–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gasisert HA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons’ national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1281–8.CrossRef Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gasisert HA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons’ national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1281–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shivo E, Helminen O, Gunn J, et al. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland. Eur J Surg Onc. 2019;45:1099–104.CrossRef Shivo E, Helminen O, Gunn J, et al. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland. Eur J Surg Onc. 2019;45:1099–104.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mitzman B, Lufti W, Wang CH, et al. Minimally Invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:244–53.CrossRef Mitzman B, Lufti W, Wang CH, et al. Minimally Invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29:244–53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):486–94.CrossRef Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):486–94.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rice TW, Ishwan H, Kelsen DP, et al. Recommendations for neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:906–12.CrossRef Rice TW, Ishwan H, Kelsen DP, et al. Recommendations for neoadjuvant pathologic staging (ypTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:906–12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ryan R, Gibbons D, Hyland JM, et al. Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2005;47(2):141–6.CrossRef Ryan R, Gibbons D, Hyland JM, et al. Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2005;47(2):141–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34:3661–79.CrossRef Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34:3661–79.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sabra MJ, Alwatari YA, Wolfe LG, et al. Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(4):370–9.CrossRef Sabra MJ, Alwatari YA, Wolfe LG, et al. Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(4):370–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tapias LF, Mathisen JM, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.CrossRef Tapias LF, Mathisen JM, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1097–103.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at a single, high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2012;42:430–7.CrossRef Shihag S, Wright CD, Wain JC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy at a single, high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2012;42:430–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schoppman SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case control study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.CrossRef Schoppman SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case control study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Straatman J, Van der Wielen, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: Three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266:232–36. Straatman J, Van der Wielen, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: Three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266:232–36.
23.
go back to reference Takeda FR, Tustumi F, Obregon CDA, et al. Prognostic value of tumor regression grade based on ryan score in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1241–7.CrossRef Takeda FR, Tustumi F, Obregon CDA, et al. Prognostic value of tumor regression grade based on ryan score in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1241–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stiles BM, Salzler GG, Nasar A, et al. Clinical predictors of early cancer-related mortality following neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2015;48:455–60.CrossRef Stiles BM, Salzler GG, Nasar A, et al. Clinical predictors of early cancer-related mortality following neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2015;48:455–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study
Authors
Robert E. Merritt
Peter J. Kneuertz
Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul
Desmond M. D’Souza
Kyle A. Perry
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01728-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue