Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Endoscopy | FELLOWS AND YOUNG GIS SECTION

Impact of a Virtual Endoscopy Training Curriculum in Novice Endoscopists: First Experience in Argentina

Authors: María Marta Piskorz, Andrés Wonaga, Lorena Bortot, María Eugenia Linares, Valentina Araya, Juan Ignacio Olmos, Mónica Gardey, Claudio Perretta, Jorge A. Olmos

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Virtual reality simulation in gastrointestinal endoscopy is an educational tool that allows repetitive instruction in a non-patient care environment.

Aim

To determine the impact of a virtual endoscopy training curriculum applying an objective pre- and post-training analysis on trainee endoscopists.

Methods

A before–after training study was carried out. Subjects were first year fellows of gastroenterology, who completed a questionnaire and then performed two pre-training simulated cases. The virtual endoscopy training curriculum consisted of an 8-h workday utilizing two GI MENTOR™ in a specialized clinical simulation center. After the training, all subjects completed the same two cases they did in the pre-training. Pre- and post-training results’ comparisons were made by paired t test.

Results

Totally, 126 subjects were included (mean age 30 years, 61% female). A significant improvement from pre- to post-training was observed in psychomotor skills (total time, percentage, and number of balloons exploded) and endoscopic skills (cecal intubation time, percentage of examined mucosa, and efficacy of screening). There was also an improvement in the quality of the endoscopic study; percentage of examined mucosa over 85% showed a significant improvement post-training with an adjusted OR of 2.72 (95% CI 1.51–4.89, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Virtual endoscopy training curriculum produces a significant improvement in the trainee endoscopists performance and their psychomotor skills and introduces the concept of a quality endoscopic study in a non-patient, risk-free environment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:273–281.CrossRef Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD, et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:273–281.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ziv A, Ben-David S, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teachnol. 2005;27:193–199.CrossRef Ziv A, Ben-David S, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teachnol. 2005;27:193–199.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh S, Sedlack RE, Cook DA. Effects of simulation-based training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1611–1623.CrossRef Singh S, Sedlack RE, Cook DA. Effects of simulation-based training in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1611–1623.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM, et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Gut. 2010;59:181–185.CrossRef Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM, et al. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Gut. 2010;59:181–185.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, et al. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 2009;84:S54–S57.CrossRef Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, et al. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med. 2009;84:S54–S57.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:798–807.CrossRef Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:798–807.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bini EJ, Firoozi B, Choung RJ, Ali EM, Osman M, Weinshel EH. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:8–16.CrossRef Bini EJ, Firoozi B, Choung RJ, Ali EM, Osman M, Weinshel EH. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:8–16.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McCashland T, Brand R, Lyden E, de Garmo P. The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy. CORI research project. Clinical outcomes research initiative. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3129–3132.CrossRef McCashland T, Brand R, Lyden E, de Garmo P. The time and financial impact of training fellows in endoscopy. CORI research project. Clinical outcomes research initiative. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3129–3132.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA, Kuipers J. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut. 2016;65:607–615.CrossRef Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA, Kuipers J. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut. 2016;65:607–615.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:361–368.CrossRef Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:361–368.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP. Learning curves and impact of psycho-motor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1514–1518.CrossRef Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP. Learning curves and impact of psycho-motor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1514–1518.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of a Virtual Endoscopy Training Curriculum in Novice Endoscopists: First Experience in Argentina
Authors
María Marta Piskorz
Andrés Wonaga
Lorena Bortot
María Eugenia Linares
Valentina Araya
Juan Ignacio Olmos
Mónica Gardey
Claudio Perretta
Jorge A. Olmos
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06532-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2020 Go to the issue

Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Negotiating Dire Straits with a BougieCap

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.