Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Eosinophilic Esophagitis | Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Negotiating Dire Straits with a BougieCap

Authors: Hannah Ramrakhiani, George Triadafilopoulos

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

A 62-year old male was initially evaluated for a progressively worsening sensation of food getting lodged below his throat associated with a decrease in caloric intake and a 16 lb weight loss. His past history was significant for hospitalization 15 months prior to chest pain, nausea, vomiting, and odynophagia. CT scan showed circumferential mural thickening of the esophagus. An upper endoscopy revealed necrotic-appearing mucosa with biopsies showing evidence of acute ischemic injury. Four weeks later, he developed dysphagia to both liquids and solids. A follow-up upper endoscopy identified a 10-cm-long stricture, extending from mid- to distal esophagus with a lumen diameter as narrow as 4 mm. Balloon dilation with a through-the-scope (TTS) balloon was complicated by an esophageal perforation that was treated with an emergent thoracotomy, distal esophagectomy, and gastric pull-up and placement of a feeding jejunostomy (Fig. 1).
Literature
2.
go back to reference Saeed ZA, Winchester CB, Ferro PS, Michaletz PA, Schwartz JT, Graham DY. Prospective randomized comparison of polyvinyl bougies and through-the-scope balloons for dilation of peptic strictures of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:189–195.CrossRef Saeed ZA, Winchester CB, Ferro PS, Michaletz PA, Schwartz JT, Graham DY. Prospective randomized comparison of polyvinyl bougies and through-the-scope balloons for dilation of peptic strictures of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:189–195.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scolapio JS, Pasha TM, Gostout CJ, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing rigid to balloon dilators for benign esophageal strictures and rings. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:13–17.CrossRef Scolapio JS, Pasha TM, Gostout CJ, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing rigid to balloon dilators for benign esophageal strictures and rings. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:13–17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference ASGE Technology Committee, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S, et al. Tools for endoscopic stricture dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:391–404.CrossRef ASGE Technology Committee, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S, et al. Tools for endoscopic stricture dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:391–404.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McClave SA, Brady PG, Wright RA, Goldschmid S, Minocha A. Does fluoroscopic guidance for Maloney esophageal dilation impact on the clinical endpoint of therapy: relief of dysphagia and achievement of luminal patency. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:93–97.CrossRef McClave SA, Brady PG, Wright RA, Goldschmid S, Minocha A. Does fluoroscopic guidance for Maloney esophageal dilation impact on the clinical endpoint of therapy: relief of dysphagia and achievement of luminal patency. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:93–97.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:784–793.CrossRef Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:784–793.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hernandez LV, Jacobson JW, Harris MS. Comparison among the perforation rates of Maloney, balloon, and savary dilation of esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:460–462.CrossRef Hernandez LV, Jacobson JW, Harris MS. Comparison among the perforation rates of Maloney, balloon, and savary dilation of esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:460–462.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mendelson AH, Small AJ, Agarwalla A, Scott FI, Kochman ML. Esophageal anastomotic strictures: outcomes of endoscopic dilation, risk of recurrence and refractory stenosis, and effect of foreign body removal. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:263.e1–271.e1.CrossRef Mendelson AH, Small AJ, Agarwalla A, Scott FI, Kochman ML. Esophageal anastomotic strictures: outcomes of endoscopic dilation, risk of recurrence and refractory stenosis, and effect of foreign body removal. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:263.e1–271.e1.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Walter B, Schmidbaur S, Rahman I, Albers D, Schumacher B, Meining A. The BougieCap—a new method for endoscopic treatment of complex benign esophageal stenosis: results from a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2019;51:866–870.CrossRef Walter B, Schmidbaur S, Rahman I, Albers D, Schumacher B, Meining A. The BougieCap—a new method for endoscopic treatment of complex benign esophageal stenosis: results from a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2019;51:866–870.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kaplan M, Mutlu EA, Jakate S, et al. Endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis: “feline” esophagus and perforation risk. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:433–437.CrossRef Kaplan M, Mutlu EA, Jakate S, et al. Endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis: “feline” esophagus and perforation risk. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:433–437.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jung KW, Gundersen N, Kopacova J, et al. Occurrence of and risk factors for complications after endoscopic dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:15–21.CrossRef Jung KW, Gundersen N, Kopacova J, et al. Occurrence of and risk factors for complications after endoscopic dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:15–21.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zimmer V. Bougie cap esophageal passage: a novel potential tool for calibration of lumen diameter in eosinophilic esophagitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:568–569.CrossRef Zimmer V. Bougie cap esophageal passage: a novel potential tool for calibration of lumen diameter in eosinophilic esophagitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:568–569.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Negotiating Dire Straits with a BougieCap
Authors
Hannah Ramrakhiani
George Triadafilopoulos
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06236-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 11/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.