Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Oral Health
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Effect of the prism-interprisms three-dimension spatial microstructure on the enamel bond strength

Authors: Chaoyang Wang, Jianhao Xu, Jingqiu Xu, Songwen Deng, Baiping Fu, Ling Zhang

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

The prism-interprisms level of the enamel hierarchical microstructure is the largest degree of structural variation and most sophisticated structural adaptation. We studied the effect of the prism-interprisms three-dimension spatial microstructure on the enamel bond strength. We prepared 11 groups of enamel segments: longitudinally sectioned segments with or without a 45-degree bevel (group = 2), horizontally sectioned segments with or without a 45-degree bevel of three regions (the incisal, middle, and cervical) (group = 6), and tangential (labial) sectioned segments of three regions (the incisal, middle, and cervical) (group = 3). The finished surface of each segment was observed by scanning electric microscopy (SEM) before treatment with four self-etch adhesive systems and applied with four corresponding composite resins. Resin-bonded enamel samples were prepared in beams for microtensile bond strength (MTBS) tests. The results were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc HSD multiple comparisons procedure. SEM observations revealed complex arrangements of prisms and interprisms. MTBS measurement showed that the longitudinally sectioned group had the lowest value, without significant differences between the groups with or without 45-degree bevel. Combining SEM observations and MTBS measurements, the prism-interprisms microstructure varied with the incisor regions, and different prism-interprisms microstructures allowed diverse sectioned surfaces, which could affect the enamel bonding.
Literature
1.
Turkistani A, Almutairi M, Banakhar N, Rubehan R, Mugharbil S, Jamleh A, et al. Optical evaluation of enamel microleakage with one-step self-etch adhesives. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36(11):589–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Al-Nuaimi N, Patel S, Foschi F, Mannocci F, Austin RS. Assessment of residual coronal tooth structure postendodontic cavity preparation using digital dental impressions and micro-computed tomography. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(4):377–92.PubMed
3.
Hasani Tabatabaei M, Shirmohammadi S, Yasini E, Mirzaei M, Arami S, Kermanshah H, et al. Comparison of dentin permeability after tooth cavity preparation with diamond bur and Er:YAG laser. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(9):630–5.PubMed
4.
5.
Wang C, Li Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Tiantang, Fu B. The enamel microstructures of bovine mandibular incisors. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012;295(10):1698–706.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Bechtle S, Ozcoban H, Lilleodden ET, Huber N, Schreyer A, Swain MV, et al. Hierarchical flexural strength of enamel: transition from brittle to damage-tolerant behaviour. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9(71):1265–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Wilmers J, Bargmann S. Nature’s design solutions in dental enamel: uniting high strength and extreme damage resistance. Acta Biomater. 2020;107:1–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Dai X, Lian X, Wang G, Shang J, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. Mapping the amelogenin protein expression during porcine molar crown development. Ann Anat. 2021;234:151665.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Küchler EC, de Lara RM, Omori MA, Schröder A, Teodoro VB, Baratto-Filho F, et al. Estrogen deficiency affects tooth formation and gene expression in the odontogenic region of female rats. Ann Anat. 2021;236:151702.CrossRefPubMed
10.
DeRocher KA, Smeets PJM, Goodge BH, Zachman MJ, Balachandran PV, Stegbauer L, et al. Chemical gradients in human enamel crystallites. Nature. 2020;583(7814):66–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zhao H, Liu S, Wei Y, Yue Y, Gao M, Li Y, et al. Multiscale engineered artificial tooth enamel. Science. 2022;375(6580):551–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Amer J Dent. 2007;20(3):161.
13.
Shimada Y, Sattabanasuk V, Sadr A, Yuan Y, He Z, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of tooth-colored indirect restorations bonded to mid-coronal and cervical dentin. Dent Mater J. 2006;30(4):7–12.CrossRef
14.
Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent. 2003;28(1):20–7.PubMed
15.
Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Adhe dent. 2002;18(6):373–7.
16.
Wang C, Ou Y, Zhang L, Zhou Z, Li M, Xu J, et al. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientations on bovine enamel bond strength and cohesive strength. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(4):334–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ikeda T, Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawakami S, Komatsu H, Sano H. Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength. Amer J Dent. 2002;15:109–13.
18.
Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CA, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhe Dent. 2000;2(4):251–7.
19.
20.
Hanaizumi Y, Maeda T, Takano Y. Three-dimensional arrangement of enamel prisms and their relation to the formation of Hunter-Schreger bands in dog tooth. Cell Tissue Res. 1996;286(1):103–14.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Renteria C, Fernández-Arteaga JM, Grimm J, Ossa EA, Arola D. Mammalian enamel: a universal tissue and diverse source of inspiration. Acta Biomater. 2021;136:402–11.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Martelli S, Giorgi M, Dall’ Ara E, Perilli E. Damage tolerance and toughness of elderly human femora. Acta Biomater. 2021;123:167–77.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Lynch CD, O’Sullivan VR, Dockery P, McGillycuddy CT, Rees JS, Sloan AJ. Hunter-Schreger Band patterns and their implications for clinical dentistry. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(5):359–65.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Wang C, Fang Y, Zhang L, Su Z, Xu J, Fu B. Enamel microstructural features of bovine and human incisors: a comparative study. Ann Anat. 2021;235:151700.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Da Costa TR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of enamel bevel on the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(5):346–56.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Soliman S, Preidl R, Karl S, Hofmann N, Krastl G, Klaiber B. Influence of cavity margin design and restorative material on marginal quality and seal of extended class II resin composite restorations in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):7–16.PubMed
27.
Zhou L, Wang Y, Yang H, Guo J, Tay FR, Huang C. Effect of chemical interaction on the bonding strengths of self-etching adhesives to deproteinised dentine. J Dent. 2015;43(8):973–80.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Liang B, Tang T, Fu B, et al. The contribution of chemical bonding to the short- and long-term enamel bond strengths. Dent Mater. 2013;29(7):103–12.CrossRef
29.
Moritake N, Takamizawa T, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, et al. Effect of active application on bond durability of universal adhesives. Oper Dent. 2019;44(2):188–99.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Jacker-Guhr S, Sander J, Luehrs AK. How universal is adhesion? Shear bond strength of multi-mode adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):87–95.PubMed
31.
D’Amario M, Piccioni C, Di Carlo S, De Angelis F, Caruso S, Capogreco M. Effect of airborne particle abrasion on microtensile bond strength of total-etch adhesives to human dentin. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2432536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Van MB, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De MJ, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17.CrossRef
33.
Bechtle S, Habelitz S, Klocke A, Fett T, Schneider GA. The fracture behaviour of dental enamel. Biomater. 2010;31(2):375–84.CrossRef
34.
Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater. 2004;20(4):322.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Shimada Y, Iwamoto N, Kawashima M, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of current adhesive systems to enamel, dentin and dentin-enamel junction region. Oper dent. 2003;28(5):585–90.PubMed
36.
Vinagre A, Ramos J, Messias A, Marques F, Caramelo F, Mata A. Microtensile bond strength and micromorphology of bur-cut enamel using five adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(2):107–16.PubMed
37.
Moosavi H, Nemati-Karimooy A, Rezaei F, Yavari Z, Ahrari F. Does the application of whitening dentifrices during at-home bleaching affect the bond strength of resin composite to dentin? BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):644.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Calvi D, Scribante A. Effect of fluoride application on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(5):580–3. quiz 626.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Arafa AM, Aboalazm E, Kamel MH. The effect of mechanical and chemo-mechanical temporary cement cleaning methods on shear bond strength with self-adhesive resin cement (an in-vitro study). BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):648.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effects of blood contamination on the shear bond strengths of conventional and hydrophilic primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(2):207–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of the prism-interprisms three-dimension spatial microstructure on the enamel bond strength
Authors
Chaoyang Wang
Jianhao Xu
Jingqiu Xu
Songwen Deng
Baiping Fu
Ling Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03599-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue

Research

The effect of APN, hs-CRP and APN/hs-CRP in periodontitis with DAA

Research

Effect of immersion and thermocycling in different beverages on the surface roughness of single- and multi-shade resin composites

Research

Stevioside reduces inflammation in periodontitis by changing the oral bacterial composition and inhibiting P. gingivalis in mice

Research

Influence of design implant and apical depth in post-extraction sockets: an in vitro simulated study

Research

Maxillary anterior segmental distraction osteogenesis to correct maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary study

Research

The impact of periodontal disease on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis