Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Clinical Study Protocol

Early complication detection after colorectal surgery (CONDOR): study protocol for a prospective clinical diagnostic study

Authors: Verena Kornmann, Bert van Ramshorst, Susan van Dieren, Nanette van Geloven, Marja Boermeester, Djamila Boerma

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most feared complications following colorectal surgery with a high morbidity and mortality rate. Multiple risk factors have been identified, but leakage still occurs. Early detection is crucial in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to create a decision algorithm for early detection of anastomotic leakage.

Methods

All patients who undergo elective colorectal surgery for benign or malignant disease are enrolled in this multicenter study. The primary endpoint is the accuracy of the prediction of anastomotic leakage. The main study parameter is the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Secondary study parameters are clinical (vital) parameters, additional laboratory or radiology examination, other complications, mortality, re-intervention, duration of hospital and intensive care stay, emergency room visits, readmission to the hospital and total costs. Daily physical examination and each step in clinical decision making will be evaluated prospectively in a standardized manner. The focus of the analysis will be on the added value of diagnostic tools, such as laboratory results and imaging studies, over physical examination by using logistic regression and decision tree analysis.

Conclusion

This study aims to develop an optimal diagnostic algorithm that can act as a guideline for surgeons or surgical residents to early identify patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME et al (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479CrossRefPubMed McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME et al (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ et al (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6(2):14–26PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ et al (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6(2):14–26PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJB, van Tets WF (2007) Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 13(27):3721–3725PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJB, van Tets WF (2007) Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 13(27):3721–3725PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kornmann VNN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB (2014) Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Int J Color Dis 29:445–451CrossRef Kornmann VNN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB (2014) Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Int J Color Dis 29:445–451CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kornmann VNN, Treskes N, Hoonhout LHF, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2013) Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis 5 of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 28(4):437–445CrossRef Kornmann VNN, Treskes N, Hoonhout LHF, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2013) Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis 5 of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 28(4):437–445CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gardner-Thorpe J, Love N, Wrightson J et al (2006) The value of modified early warning score (MEWS) in surgical in-patients: a prospective observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:571–575PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gardner-Thorpe J, Love N, Wrightson J et al (2006) The value of modified early warning score (MEWS) in surgical in-patients: a prospective observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:571–575PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early complication detection after colorectal surgery (CONDOR): study protocol for a prospective clinical diagnostic study
Authors
Verena Kornmann
Bert van Ramshorst
Susan van Dieren
Nanette van Geloven
Marja Boermeester
Djamila Boerma
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2468-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2016 Go to the issue