Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2019

01-10-2019 | Dynamic Hip Screw | Original Article • HIP - TRAUMA

Femoral offset loss and internal arch restoration defect are correlated with intramedullary nail cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case–control study

Authors: B. Boukebous, C. H. Flouzat-Lachaniette, J. Donadio, Z. Chenguel, P. Guillon, M. A. Rousseau

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

In a previous study, we investigated the link between the femoral offset (FO) loss by trochanteric impaction (TI) and cut-out complication occurrence after pertrochanteric fractures. Three major factors are likely to drive to failure after intramedullary nailing (IN): fracture stability, reduction quality and osteosynthesis quality. We wanted to investigate the quality of the fracture reduction through the TI and the neck-shaft angle (NSA) measurement and correlate these parameters with the risk of mechanical failure occurrence.

Materials and methods

It was a retrospective multicentric one case–one control match design study with age and gender randomization. The cases presented a mechanical failure of nailing: \({\text{TI}} = 1 - \frac{{{\text{FO}}_{\text{fractured}} }}{{{\text{FO}}_{\text{healthy}} }}\) in percentage. Femoral rotation was taken into account, and all TI were rotation-corrected (TIcorrected). Rotation-corrected neck-shaft angles (NSAcorrected) were calculated. The neck-shaft angle gap between the fractured and the healthy sides (NSAgap) was a ratio: \({\text{NSA}}_{\text{gap}} = 1 - \frac{{{\text{NSA}}_{\text{corrected}} }}{{{\text{NSA}}_{\text{healthy}} }}\) in percentage. The tip–apex distance (TAD) was measured. Absolute values of TIcorrected and NSAgap were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-one cases and 21 controls were examined. The average TIcorrected rate was 30% for the cases and 11% for the controls (p = 0.007). A 13% TIcorrected threshold had maximum specificity and sensitivity, equal to 71%. The average TAD was 27 mm for cases and 19 mm for controls (p = 0.004). The average NSAgap rate was 7% for the case group and 4% for the control group (p = 0.009). The areas under the ROC curves for TIcorrected, TAD and NSAgap were 0.73, 0.73 and 0.66, respectively.

Interpretation

Closed reduction and exclusive implantation of IN do not seem optimal in case of FO or NSA restoration failure after pertrochanteric fractures.

Level of evidence

Level III, case–control study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Briot K, Maravic M, Roux C (2015) Changes in number and incidence of hip fractures over 12 years in France. Bone 81:131–137CrossRef Briot K, Maravic M, Roux C (2015) Changes in number and incidence of hip fractures over 12 years in France. Bone 81:131–137CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1996) Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials. Int Orthop 20:163–171CrossRef Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1996) Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials. Int Orthop 20:163–171CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064CrossRef Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pascarella R, Fantasia R, Maresca A, Bettuzzi C, Amendola L, Violini S et al (2016) How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System. Musculoskelet Surg 100:1–8CrossRef Pascarella R, Fantasia R, Maresca A, Bettuzzi C, Amendola L, Violini S et al (2016) How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System. Musculoskelet Surg 100:1–8CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, Saggioro E, Barbati G, Ratti C et al (2018) Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:351–359CrossRef Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, Saggioro E, Barbati G, Ratti C et al (2018) Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:351–359CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Briot B (1980) Fractures trochantériennes récentes: anatomie pathologique et classifications. In: Fractures de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur, Cahiers d'enseignement de la SOFCOT, expansion scientifique française, 69–77 Briot B (1980) Fractures trochantériennes récentes: anatomie pathologique et classifications. In: Fractures de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur, Cahiers d'enseignement de la SOFCOT, expansion scientifique française, 69–77
7.
go back to reference De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G (2012) Reliability of predictors for screw cut-out in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1266–1272CrossRef De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G (2012) Reliability of predictors for screw cut-out in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1266–1272CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Biber R, Berger J, Bail HJ (2016) The art of trochanteric fracture reduction. Injury 47:S3–S6CrossRef Biber R, Berger J, Bail HJ (2016) The art of trochanteric fracture reduction. Injury 47:S3–S6CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W (2010) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop 34:719–722CrossRef Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W (2010) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop 34:719–722CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A (2013) Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2(14):1CrossRef Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A (2013) Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2(14):1CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP (2017) Risk factors associated with cephalomedullary nail cut-out in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31:583–591CrossRef Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP (2017) Risk factors associated with cephalomedullary nail cut-out in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31:583–591CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morvan A, Boddaert J, Cohen-Bittan J, Picard H, Pascal-Mousselard H, Khiami F (2018) Risk factors for cut-out after internal fixation of trochanteric fractures in elderly subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1183–1190CrossRef Morvan A, Boddaert J, Cohen-Bittan J, Picard H, Pascal-Mousselard H, Khiami F (2018) Risk factors for cut-out after internal fixation of trochanteric fractures in elderly subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1183–1190CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boukebous B, Guillon P, Vandenbussche E, Rousseau MA (2018) Correlation between femoral offset loss and dynamic hip screw cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28:1321–1326CrossRef Boukebous B, Guillon P, Vandenbussche E, Rousseau MA (2018) Correlation between femoral offset loss and dynamic hip screw cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28:1321–1326CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, Bücking B et al (2014) The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop 85:389–395CrossRef Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, Bücking B et al (2014) The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop 85:389–395CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Buecking B, Boese CK, Seifert V, Ruchholtz S, Frink M, Lechler P (2015) Femoral offset following trochanteric femoral fractures: a prospective observational study. Injury 46:S88–S92CrossRef Buecking B, Boese CK, Seifert V, Ruchholtz S, Frink M, Lechler P (2015) Femoral offset following trochanteric femoral fractures: a prospective observational study. Injury 46:S88–S92CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ, Ishizuka T (1959) A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 4:1399–1408CrossRef Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ, Ishizuka T (1959) A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 4:1399–1408CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF (1979) Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:216–221CrossRef Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF (1979) Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:216–221CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M, Paccola CaJ (2004) Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO–ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:31–38CrossRef Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M, Paccola CaJ (2004) Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO–ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:31–38CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chang S-M, Zhang Y-Q, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P (2015) Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:811–819CrossRef Chang S-M, Zhang Y-Q, Ma Z, Li Q, Dargel J, Eysel P (2015) Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:811–819CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Putz P, Coussaert E, Delvaux D, Long Pretz P, Thys R, Cantraine F (1990) Osteosynthesis of lesions of the proximal femur using dynamic screw plates. Multicenter study: 1871 cases. Int Orthop 14:285–292CrossRef Putz P, Coussaert E, Delvaux D, Long Pretz P, Thys R, Cantraine F (1990) Osteosynthesis of lesions of the proximal femur using dynamic screw plates. Multicenter study: 1871 cases. Int Orthop 14:285–292CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hsueh K-K, Fang C-K, Chen C-M, Su Y-P, Wu H-F, Chiu F-Y (2010) Risk factors in cut-out of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 34:1273–1279CrossRef Hsueh K-K, Fang C-K, Chen C-M, Su Y-P, Wu H-F, Chiu F-Y (2010) Risk factors in cut-out of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 34:1273–1279CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Baird RP, O’Brien P, Cruickshank D (2014) Comparison of stable and unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures managed with 2- and 4-hole side plates. Can J Surg 57:327–330CrossRef Baird RP, O’Brien P, Cruickshank D (2014) Comparison of stable and unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures managed with 2- and 4-hole side plates. Can J Surg 57:327–330CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hélin M, Pelissier A, Boyer P, Delory T, Estellat C, Massin P (2015) Does the PFNA™ nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture? A 115 case-control series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 101:45–51CrossRef Hélin M, Pelissier A, Boyer P, Delory T, Estellat C, Massin P (2015) Does the PFNA™ nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture? A 115 case-control series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 101:45–51CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB (2001) Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:36–41CrossRef Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB (2001) Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:36–41CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Li C, Xie B, Chen S, Lin G, Yang G, Zhang L (2016) The effect of local bone density on mechanical failure after internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:223–232CrossRef Li C, Xie B, Chen S, Lin G, Yang G, Zhang L (2016) The effect of local bone density on mechanical failure after internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:223–232CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fichman SG, Mäkinen TJ, Safir O, Vincent A, Lozano B, Kashigar A et al (2016) Arthroplasty for unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures may offer a lower re-operation rate as compared to cephalomedullary nailing. Int Orthop 40:15–20CrossRef Fichman SG, Mäkinen TJ, Safir O, Vincent A, Lozano B, Kashigar A et al (2016) Arthroplasty for unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures may offer a lower re-operation rate as compared to cephalomedullary nailing. Int Orthop 40:15–20CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mäkinen TJ, Gunton M, Fichman SG, Kashigar A, Safir O, Kuzyk PRT (2015) Arthroplasty for pertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 46:433–444CrossRef Mäkinen TJ, Gunton M, Fichman SG, Kashigar A, Safir O, Kuzyk PRT (2015) Arthroplasty for pertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 46:433–444CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gupta RK, Gupta V, Gupta N (2012) Outcomes of osteoporotic trochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented dynamic hip screw. Indian J Orthop 46:640–645CrossRef Gupta RK, Gupta V, Gupta N (2012) Outcomes of osteoporotic trochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented dynamic hip screw. Indian J Orthop 46:640–645CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fensky F, Nüchtern JV, Kolb JP, Huber S, Rupprecht M, Jauch SY et al (2013) Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures-a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury 44:802–809CrossRef Fensky F, Nüchtern JV, Kolb JP, Huber S, Rupprecht M, Jauch SY et al (2013) Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures-a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury 44:802–809CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kammerlander C, Gebhard F, Meier C, Lenich A, Linhart W, Clasbrummel B et al (2011) Standardised cement augmentation of the PFNA using a perforated blade: a new technique and preliminary clinical results. A prospective multicentre trial. Injury 42:1484–1490CrossRef Kammerlander C, Gebhard F, Meier C, Lenich A, Linhart W, Clasbrummel B et al (2011) Standardised cement augmentation of the PFNA using a perforated blade: a new technique and preliminary clinical results. A prospective multicentre trial. Injury 42:1484–1490CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Claes L, Becker C, Simnacher M, Hoellen I (1995) Improvement in the primary stability of the dynamic hip screw osteosynthesis in unstable, pertrochanteric femoral fractures of osteoporotic bones by a new glass ionomer cement. Unfallchirurg 98:118–123PubMed Claes L, Becker C, Simnacher M, Hoellen I (1995) Improvement in the primary stability of the dynamic hip screw osteosynthesis in unstable, pertrochanteric femoral fractures of osteoporotic bones by a new glass ionomer cement. Unfallchirurg 98:118–123PubMed
Metadata
Title
Femoral offset loss and internal arch restoration defect are correlated with intramedullary nail cut-out complications after pertrochanteric fractures: a case–control study
Authors
B. Boukebous
C. H. Flouzat-Lachaniette
J. Donadio
Z. Chenguel
P. Guillon
M. A. Rousseau
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02481-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 7/2019 Go to the issue

General Review • TUMORS - METASTASES

What’s new in management of bone metastases?