Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 8/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Paper

Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was designed to assess the risk factors of lag-screw cutout in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). From 2003 to 2007, 1,150 patients who had acute unilateral intertrochanteric fractures of the femur were enrolled to the study. All fractures were managed by closed reduction and internal fixation with 135° DHS devices. Patient demographics, fracture patterns, reduction and fixation and perioperative course parameters were all recorded. The follow-up period was 38 months on average (range 16–60 months). Finally, 937 patients were available for evaluation of final results in which we focused on lag-screw cutout. Excluding complications not related to screw position, 64 patients (6.8%) with screw cutout were encountered, and the remaining 873 patients had uneventful union, with the average union time of 17.5 weeks (range15–24 weeks). Upon analysis with logistic regression, the tip−apex distance (TAD) was shown to be the most important predictive factor for cutout, followed by screw position, fracture pattern, reduction and patient age. In order to decrease the risk of lag-screw cutout, it is important to ensure good fracture reduction and to place the lag screw in either the middle/middle or inferior/middle position with appropriate TAD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists (2009) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111 American Society of Anesthesiologists (2009) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111
2.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064PubMed Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064PubMed
3.
go back to reference Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD (1997) Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:969–971PubMedCrossRef Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD (1997) Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:969–971PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bonamo JJ, Accettola AB (1982) Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a sliding nail-plate. J Trauma 22:205–215PubMedCrossRef Bonamo JJ, Accettola AB (1982) Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a sliding nail-plate. J Trauma 22:205–215PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T (1959) A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:1399–1408PubMed Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr, Ishizuka T (1959) A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:1399–1408PubMed
6.
go back to reference Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG (1990) Intertrochanteric femoral fractures: mechanical failures after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:26–31PubMed Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG (1990) Intertrochanteric femoral fractures: mechanical failures after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:26–31PubMed
7.
go back to reference Evans EM (1951) Trochanteric fractures: a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33:192–204 Evans EM (1951) Trochanteric fractures: a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33:192–204
8.
go back to reference Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:647–663 Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:647–663
9.
go back to reference Kaufer H, Mattews LS, Sonstegard D (1974) Stable fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. A biomechanical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:899–907PubMed Kaufer H, Mattews LS, Sonstegard D (1974) Stable fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. A biomechanical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:899–907PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kyle RF (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:924–950 Kyle RF (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:924–950
11.
go back to reference Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF (1976) Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. A retrospective and prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:216–221 Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF (1976) Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. A retrospective and prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:216–221
12.
go back to reference Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W (2009) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7 PubMed Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W (2009) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-009-0837-7 PubMed
13.
go back to reference Larsson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI (1990) Trochanteric fractures. Influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications. Clin Orthop 259:130–139PubMed Larsson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI (1990) Trochanteric fractures. Influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications. Clin Orthop 259:130–139PubMed
14.
go back to reference Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. A comparative study with Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:241–248PubMedCrossRef Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A, Ekeland A, Strømsøe K (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. A comparative study with Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:241–248PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mainds CC, Newman RJ (1989) Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device. Injury 20:98–100PubMedCrossRef Mainds CC, Newman RJ (1989) Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device. Injury 20:98–100PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liu M, Yang Z, Pei F, Huang F, Chen S, Xiang Z (2009) A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0783-4, April Online Published Liu M, Yang Z, Pei F, Huang F, Chen S, Xiang Z (2009) A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-009-0783-4, April Online Published
17.
go back to reference Parker MJ (1992) Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:625PubMed Parker MJ (1992) Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:625PubMed
18.
go back to reference Nordin S, Zulkifli O, Faisham WI (2001) Mechanical failure of dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation in intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. Med J Malaysia 56:12–17PubMed Nordin S, Zulkifli O, Faisham WI (2001) Mechanical failure of dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation in intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. Med J Malaysia 56:12–17PubMed
19.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2008) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD000093 Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2008) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD000093
21.
go back to reference Pervez H, Parker MJ, Vowler S (2004) Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. Injury 35:994–998PubMedCrossRef Pervez H, Parker MJ, Vowler S (2004) Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. Injury 35:994–998PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AH (1995) How to minimize failure of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 26:611–614PubMedCrossRef Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AH (1995) How to minimize failure of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 26:611–614PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saarenpää I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, Hyvönen P, Leppilahti J, Jalovaara P (2009) Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop 33:255–260PubMedCrossRef Saarenpää I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, Hyvönen P, Leppilahti J, Jalovaara P (2009) Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop 33:255–260PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee MY, MS TCL (1996) Biomechanical analysis of location of lag screw of a dynamic hip screw in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture. J Trauma 41:699–702PubMedCrossRef Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee MY, MS TCL (1996) Biomechanical analysis of location of lag screw of a dynamic hip screw in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture. J Trauma 41:699–702PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients
Publication date
01-12-2010
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0866-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

International Orthopaedics 8/2010 Go to the issue