Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2006

01-11-2006 | Physics

Dosimetric characteristics of a 16-slice computed tomography scanner

Authors: Nicholas Theocharopoulos, Kostas Perisinakis, John Damilakis, Spyros Karampekios, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Standard CT dose measurements were performed on a Siemens Sensation 16 scanner. CT dose indices, free-in-air (CTDIF) and weighted (CTDIW), were measured in all available axial and helical beam collimations of the head and body scanning modes. The effect of tube current, high voltage, rotation time, beam collimation and pitch on the CT doses was investigated. CT doses increased as a power function of high voltage. The kVp exponent n varied with beam collimation from 2.7 to 3.1 for CTDIW, and from 2.4 to 2.6 for CTDIF. Automatic change of the focal spot size increased radiation doses up to a factor of 1.18. Measured small-focus CTDIW values differed from those displayed at the console from –24 to 14%. Peripheral doses in the head phantom were higher compared to the body phantom by a factor of 1.5 to 2. Central doses are 2.7 to 4.1 times higher. Differences in beam collimation resulted in 50% variation in the CTDIW in the body phantom and 60% in the head phantom. In conclusion, our study has confirmed the great impact of technique factors and acquisition parameters on CT doses. The provided comprehensive dosimetric data will facilitate the dose-effective use of the scanner studied.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fuchs T, Kachelriess M, Kalender WA (2000) Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 36:69–73PubMedCrossRef Fuchs T, Kachelriess M, Kalender WA (2000) Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 36:69–73PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hara K, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS (2001) CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465PubMed Hara K, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS (2001) CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Kopp AF, Schoepf UJ, Baum U, Knez A, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Reiser MF (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217:564–571PubMed Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, Kopp AF, Schoepf UJ, Baum U, Knez A, Klingenbeck-Regn K, Reiser MF (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217:564–571PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:285–287PubMed Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:285–287PubMed
7.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. I. Aspects of examination frequency and quality assurance. National Radiological Protection Board publication no. NRPB-R248. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Chilton, England Shrimpton PC, Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. I. Aspects of examination frequency and quality assurance. National Radiological Protection Board publication no. NRPB-R248. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Chilton, England
8.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. II. Dosimetric aspects. National Radiological Protection Board publication no. NRPB-R249. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Chilton, England Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Le Heron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. II. Dosimetric aspects. National Radiological Protection Board publication no. NRPB-R249. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Chilton, England
9.
go back to reference United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 2000 report to the General Assembly, Annex D: medical radiation exposures. New York, NY: United Nations, 2000 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 2000 report to the General Assembly, Annex D: medical radiation exposures. New York, NY: United Nations, 2000
10.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 87, Ann ICRP 2000; Vol 30, Iss 4 International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Oxford: Pergamon Press; ICRP Publication 87, Ann ICRP 2000; Vol 30, Iss 4
11.
go back to reference European Commission’s Study Group (1998) Quality criteria for computed tomography. Working Document. EUR 16262 European Commission’s Study Group (1998) Quality criteria for computed tomography. Working Document. EUR 16262
12.
go back to reference McCollough CH, Zink FE (1999) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26:2223–2230PubMedCrossRef McCollough CH, Zink FE (1999) Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26:2223–2230PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thomton FJ, Paulson EK, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, Nelson RC (2003) Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. Acad Radiol 10:379–385 Thomton FJ, Paulson EK, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, Nelson RC (2003) Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles. Acad Radiol 10:379–385
14.
go back to reference Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4PubMed Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772PubMed Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772PubMed
16.
go back to reference Brix G, Lechel U, Veit R, Truckenbrodt R, Stamm G, Coppenrath EM, Griebel J, Nagel HD (2004) Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur Radiol 14:1275–1284PubMedCrossRef Brix G, Lechel U, Veit R, Truckenbrodt R, Stamm G, Coppenrath EM, Griebel J, Nagel HD (2004) Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur Radiol 14:1275–1284PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nagel HD (ed) (2000) Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data, terminology, 2nd edn. COCIR European Coordination Committee of the Radiological and Electromedical Industries, Frankfurt Nagel HD (ed) (2000) Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data, terminology, 2nd edn. COCIR European Coordination Committee of the Radiological and Electromedical Industries, Frankfurt
18.
go back to reference Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435PubMed Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G (2000) Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 217:430–435PubMed
19.
go back to reference Gupta AK, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Paulson EK, Delong DM, Yoshizumi TT (2003) Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiology 227:739–745PubMed Gupta AK, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Paulson EK, Delong DM, Yoshizumi TT (2003) Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiology 227:739–745PubMed
20.
go back to reference Cody DD, Moxley DM, Krugh KT, O’Daniel JC, Wagner LK, Eftekhari F (2004) Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:849–859PubMed Cody DD, Moxley DM, Krugh KT, O’Daniel JC, Wagner LK, Eftekhari F (2004) Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:849–859PubMed
21.
go back to reference Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality. Med Phys 31:595–601PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality. Med Phys 31:595–601PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nickoloff EL, Dutta AK, Lu ZF (2003) Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Med Phys 30:395–402PubMedCrossRef Nickoloff EL, Dutta AK, Lu ZF (2003) Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Med Phys 30:395–402PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C (2004) Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology 233:515–522PubMed Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C (2004) Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology 233:515–522PubMed
24.
go back to reference Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. Med Phys 31:588–594PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. Med Phys 31:588–594PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalendar WA, Bautz W (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalendar WA, Bautz W (2004) Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14:995–999PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Verdun FR, Lepori D, Monnin P, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F (2004) Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominalexaminations. Eur Radiol 14:835–841PubMedCrossRef Verdun FR, Lepori D, Monnin P, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F (2004) Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominalexaminations. Eur Radiol 14:835–841PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360PubMed Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228:352–360PubMed
29.
go back to reference Mahesh M, Scatarige JC, Cooper J, Fishman EK (2001) Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1273–1275PubMed Mahesh M, Scatarige JC, Cooper J, Fishman EK (2001) Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1273–1275PubMed
30.
go back to reference Gurung J, Khan MF, Maataoui A, Herzog C, Bux R, Bratzke H, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2005) Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT. Eur Radiol 15:1898–1905PubMedCrossRef Gurung J, Khan MF, Maataoui A, Herzog C, Bux R, Bratzke H, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2005) Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT. Eur Radiol 15:1898–1905PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 15:14–22PubMedCrossRef Wormanns D, Ludwig K, Beyer F, Heindel W, Diederich S (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules at multirow-detector CT: effectiveness of double reading to improve sensitivity at standard-dose and low-dose chest CT. Eur Radiol 15:14–22PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dosimetric characteristics of a 16-slice computed tomography scanner
Authors
Nicholas Theocharopoulos
Kostas Perisinakis
John Damilakis
Spyros Karampekios
Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0251-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

European Radiology 11/2006 Go to the issue

Calendar of Events

Calendar of Events