Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2004

01-07-2004 | Physics

Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study

Authors: G. Brix, U. Lechel, R. Veit, R. Truckenbrodt, G. Stamm, E. M. Coppenrath, J. Griebel, H.-D. Nagel

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Dose assessment in computed tomography (CT) is challenging due to the vast variety of CT scanners and imaging protocols in use. In the present study, the accurateness of a theoretical formalism implemented in the PC program CT-EXPO for dose calculation was evaluated by means of phantom measurements. Phantom measurements were performed with four 1-slice, four 4-slice and two 16-slice spiral CT scanners. Firstly, scanner-specific n CTDI w values were measured and compared with the corresponding standard values used for dose calculation. Secondly, effective doses were determined for three CT scans (head, chest and pelvis) performed at each of the ten installations from readings of thermoluminescent dosimeters distributed inside an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with the corresponding dose values computed with CT-EXPO. Differences between standard and individually measured n CTDI w values were less than 16%. Statistical analysis yielded a highly significant correlation (P<0.001) between calculated and measured effective doses. The systematic and random uncertainty of the dose values calculated using standard n CTDI w values was about −9 and ±11%, respectively. The phantom measurements and model calculations were carried out for a variety of CT scanners and representative scan protocols validate the reliability of the dosimetric formalism considered—at least for patients with a standard body size and a tube voltage of 120 kV selected for the majority of CT scans performed in our study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock O (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183PubMed Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock O (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183PubMed
2.
go back to reference Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209:327–329PubMed Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 209:327–329PubMed
3.
go back to reference Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124PubMed Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Kopp AF, Baum U (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rydberg J, Buckalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, Phillips MD, Conces DJ, Aisen AM, Persohn SA, Kopecky KK (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMed Rydberg J, Buckalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, Phillips MD, Conces DJ, Aisen AM, Persohn SA, Kopecky KK (2000) Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 20:1787–1806PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dawson P, Lees WR (2001) Multi-slice technology in computed tomography. Clin Radiol 56:302–309PubMed Dawson P, Lees WR (2001) Multi-slice technology in computed tomography. Clin Radiol 56:302–309PubMed
6.
go back to reference Laghi A, Lannaccone R, Panebianco V, Carbone L, Passariello R (2001) Multislice CT colonography: technical developments. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22:425–431PubMed Laghi A, Lannaccone R, Panebianco V, Carbone L, Passariello R (2001) Multislice CT colonography: technical developments. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22:425–431PubMed
7.
go back to reference Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Hofmann LK, Das M, Flohr T, Ohnesorg BM, Baumert B, Rolnick J, Alles JM, Raptopulos V (2003) Multislice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 13:1946–1961PubMed Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Hofmann LK, Das M, Flohr T, Ohnesorg BM, Baumert B, Rolnick J, Alles JM, Raptopulos V (2003) Multislice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 13:1946–1961PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Bruening R, Reiser MF (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology 223:474–480PubMed Hong C, Becker CR, Schoepf UJ, Ohnesorge B, Bruening R, Reiser MF (2002) Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. Radiology 223:474–480PubMed
9.
go back to reference UNSCEAR 2000 Report, vol. I, sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Annex D: medical radiation exposures (2000). United Nations Sales Publications UNSCEAR 2000 Report, vol. I, sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Annex D: medical radiation exposures (2000). United Nations Sales Publications
10.
go back to reference LeHeron JC (1993) CTDOSE—a computer program to enable the calculation of organ doses and dose indices for CT examinations. Ministry of Health, National Radiation Laboratory, Christchurch, New Zealand LeHeron JC (1993) CTDOSE—a computer program to enable the calculation of organ doses and dose indices for CT examinations. Ministry of Health, National Radiation Laboratory, Christchurch, New Zealand
12.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M (1999) A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 9:555–562PubMed Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M (1999) A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 9:555–562PubMed
13.
go back to reference National Institute of Radiation Hygiene (1999) CT dose calculation software “CT-Dose”. National Institute of Radiation Hygiene, Herlev. ctdose@sis.dk National Institute of Radiation Hygiene (1999) CT dose calculation software “CT-Dose”. National Institute of Radiation Hygiene, Herlev. ctdose@sis.dk
14.
go back to reference Tack D (2001) Comments on Kalender et al.: a PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 11:2641–2642 and Kalender WA, Schmidt B (2001) Reply to Tack D: a PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 11:2643CrossRef Tack D (2001) Comments on Kalender et al.: a PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 11:2641–2642 and Kalender WA, Schmidt B (2001) Reply to Tack D: a PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 11:2643CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-Expo-ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT. Fortschr Rontgenstr 174:1570–1576 Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-Expo-ein neuartiges Programm zur Dosisevaluierung in der CT. Fortschr Rontgenstr 174:1570–1576
16.
go back to reference Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 3. Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB-250. National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 3. Normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRPB-250. National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon
17.
go back to reference Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part IV. Organ doses from tomographic examinations. GSF report 30/91. Neuherberg Zankl M, Panzer W, Drexler G (1991) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part IV. Organ doses from tomographic examinations. GSF report 30/91. Neuherberg
18.
go back to reference Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2001) CT-Expositionspraxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Fortschr Rontgenstr 173:R1–R66 Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2001) CT-Expositionspraxis in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Fortschr Rontgenstr 173:R1–R66
19.
go back to reference Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: Results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991CrossRefPubMed Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: Results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nagel HD, Galanski M, Hidajat N, Maier W, Schmidt T (2002) Radiation exposure in computed tomography–fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data, terminology. 4th edn. CTB Publications, Hamburg (ctb-publications@gmx.de) Nagel HD, Galanski M, Hidajat N, Maier W, Schmidt T (2002) Radiation exposure in computed tomography–fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data, terminology. 4th edn. CTB Publications, Hamburg (ctb-publications@gmx.de)
21.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 60 (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP vol 21/1-3. Elsevier Science, Oxford ICRP Publication 60 (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP vol 21/1-3. Elsevier Science, Oxford
22.
go back to reference European Commission (1999) Report EUR 16262 EN “European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography” European Commission (1999) Report EUR 16262 EN “European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography”
23.
go back to reference Kramer R, Zankl M, Wiliams G, Drexler G (1982) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part I. The male (Adam) and female (Eva) adult mathematical phantoms. GSF report S-885. Neuherberg Kramer R, Zankl M, Wiliams G, Drexler G (1982) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. Part I. The male (Adam) and female (Eva) adult mathematical phantoms. GSF report S-885. Neuherberg
24.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Leheron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2. Dosimetric aspects. NRPB-249. London: HMSO, 48 Shrimpton PC, Jones DG, Hillier MC, Wall BF, Leheron JC, Faulkner K (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 2. Dosimetric aspects. NRPB-249. London: HMSO, 48
25.
go back to reference Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito, CA
26.
go back to reference ICRU Publication 17 (1970) Radiation dosimetry: X-rays generated at potentials of 5 to 150 kV. ICRU Publications, Washington, DC ICRU Publication 17 (1970) Radiation dosimetry: X-rays generated at potentials of 5 to 150 kV. ICRU Publications, Washington, DC
27.
go back to reference European Commission (2000) Report EUR 19604 EN “Recommendations for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology using TLD” European Commission (2000) Report EUR 19604 EN “Recommendations for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology using TLD”
29.
go back to reference Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys 47:463–467PubMed Huda W, Sandison GA (1984) Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements. Health Phys 47:463–467PubMed
30.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S (1998) CT scaner dosimetry. Br J Radiol 71:1–3 Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S (1998) CT scaner dosimetry. Br J Radiol 71:1–3
31.
go back to reference Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 13:1148–1153PubMed Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 13:1148–1153PubMed
32.
go back to reference Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Fill U, Regulla D (2002) The GSF family of voxel phantoms. Phys Med Biol 47:89–106CrossRefPubMed Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Fill U, Regulla D (2002) The GSF family of voxel phantoms. Phys Med Biol 47:89–106CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Dinkel HP, Sonnenschein M, Hoppe H, Vock P (2003) Low-dose multislice CT of the thorax in follow-up of malignant lymphoma and extrapulmonary primary tumors. Eur Radiol 13:1241–1249PubMed Dinkel HP, Sonnenschein M, Hoppe H, Vock P (2003) Low-dose multislice CT of the thorax in follow-up of malignant lymphoma and extrapulmonary primary tumors. Eur Radiol 13:1241–1249PubMed
34.
go back to reference Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Piacentini F, Passariello R (2003) Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 13:1297–1313PubMed Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Piacentini F, Passariello R (2003) Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 13:1297–1313PubMed
35.
go back to reference Diederich S (2003) Radiation dose in helical CT for detection of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 13:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed Diederich S (2003) Radiation dose in helical CT for detection of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 13:1491–1493CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P, Flohr T, Suess C, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2003) Ulta-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using mutlislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur Radiol 13:1923–1930CrossRefPubMed Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P, Flohr T, Suess C, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2003) Ulta-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using mutlislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur Radiol 13:1923–1930CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study
Authors
G. Brix
U. Lechel
R. Veit
R. Truckenbrodt
G. Stamm
E. M. Coppenrath
J. Griebel
H.-D. Nagel
Publication date
01-07-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2267-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2004

European Radiology 7/2004 Go to the issue