Top

Emergency Radiology

Published in:

01-04-2018 | Original Article

Dose monitoring in pediatric and young adult head and cervical spine CT studies at two emergency duty departments

Authors: Hannele Niiniviita, Timo Kiljunen, Minna Huuskonen, Simo Teperi, Jarmo Kulmala

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

Purpose

As the number of pediatric computed tomography (CT) imaging is increasing, there is a need for real-time radiation dose monitoring and evaluation of the imaging protocols. The aim of this study was to present the imaging data, patient doses, and observations of pediatric and young adult trauma—and routine head CT and cervical spine CT collected by a dose monitoring software.

Methods

Patient age, study date, imaging parameters, and patient dose as volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP) were collected from two emergency departments’ CT scanners for 2-year period. The patients were divided into four age groups (0–5, 6–10, 11–15, and 16–20 years) for statistical analysis and effective dose determination. The 75th percentile doses were evaluated to be used as local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).

Results

Six hundred fifteen trauma head, 318 routine head, and 592 trauma cervical spine CT studies were assessed. All mean CTDI_vol values were statistically lower in hospital B (40.3 ± 12.3, 30.03 ± 11.1, and 6.9 ± 3.1 mGy, respectively) than in hospital A (53.0 ± 12.9, 43.2 ± 8.7, and 18.3 ± 7.3 mGy, respectively). Statistically significant differences were observed on scanning length between hospitals and between CTDI_vol values when protocol was updated. The 75th percentiles of trauma cervical spine in hospital B can be used as local DRL. Non-optimized protocols were also revealed in hospital A.

Conclusion

Dose monitoring software offers a valuable tool for evaluating the imaging practices and finding non-optimized protocols.

Available only for authorised users

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(2):289–296. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 CrossRefPubMed

Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Craft AW et al Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed

UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) (2010) UNSCEAR 2008 Report: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York

Miller DL, Vano E, Rehani M (2015) Reducing radiation, revising reference levels. J Am Coll Radiol: JACR 12(3):214–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.012 CrossRefPubMed

The council of the European Union (2013) Council directive 2013/59/EURATOM. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/.../CELEX-32013L0059-EN-TXT.pdf. Accessed 10/3/2016

Vassileva J, Rehani M (2015) Diagnostic reference levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):W1–W3. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12794 CrossRefPubMed

Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP, Mandel KE, Towbin AJ, Larson DB, Callahan MJ, Darge K, Podberesky DJ, Frush DP, Westra SJ, Prince JS (2013) Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 268(1):208–218. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120730 CrossRefPubMed

10.

International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1997) Protection from potential exposures - Application to selected radiation sources. ICRP Publication 76. Ann ICRP 27(2):1–61

11.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) https://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/InformationFor/HealthProfessionals/1_Radiology/ComputedTomography/diagnostic-reference-levels.htm. Accessed 20 May 2016

12.

Brady Z, Ramanauskas F, Cain TM, Johnston PN (2012) Assessment of paediatric CT dose indicators for the purpose of optimisation. Br J Radiol 85(1019):1488–1498. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/28015185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Salminen E, Niiniviita H, Kulmala J, Maattanen H, Jarvinen H (2012) Radiation dose estimation in computed tomography examinations using NRPB-SR250 software in a retrospective analysis of a patient population. Radiat Prot Dosim 152(4):328–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs065 CrossRef

14.

Janbabanezhad Toori A, Shabestani-Monfared A, Deevband MR, Abdi R, Nabahati M (2015) Dose assessment in computed tomography examination and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in Mazandaran, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng 5(4):177–184PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Boos J, Meineke A, Rubbert C, Heusch P, Lanzman RS, Aissa J, Antoch G, Kropil P (2016) Cloud-based CT dose monitoring using the DICOM-structured report: fully automated analysis in regard to National Diagnostic Reference Levels. Rofo 188(3):288–294. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-108059 PubMed

16.

McCollough CH Diagnostic reference levels. Image Wisely. http://www.imagewisely.org/Imaging-Modalities/Computed-Tomography/Medical-Physicists/Articles/Diagnostic-Reference-Levels. Accessed 14 May 2016

17.

International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2001) Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP 31:5–31

18.

Ghizoni E, Fraga Ade M, Baracat EC, Joaquim AF, Fraga GP, Rizoli S, Nascimento B (2013) Indications for head computed tomography in children with mild traumatic brain injury. Rev Col Bras Cir 40(6):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912013000600016 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Davis PC, Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging (2007) Head trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1619–1621PubMed

20.

Rahman SA, Chandrasala S (2014) When to suspect head injury or cervical spine injury in maxillofacial trauma? Dent Res J (Isfahan) 11(3):336–344

21.

Shrimpton PC (2004) Assessment of patient dose in CT. NRPB-PE/1/2004, EC Contract No.: FIGM-CT-2000-20078. Chilton, Oxon

22.

Jarvinen H, Seuri R, Kortesniemi M, Lajunen A, Hallinen E, Savikurki-Heikkila P, Laarne P, Perhomaa M, Tyrvainen E (2015) Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT: a new approach with proposed values. Radiat Prot Dosim 165(1-4):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv044 CrossRef

23.

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Medical Research Act No. 488/1999. Original text in Finnish. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1999/19990488. Accessed 4/27/2016

24.

STUK (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority) (2015) Potilaan säteilyaltistuksen vertailutasot lasten tietokonetomografiatutkimuksissa, päätös 9/3020/2015 (Reference levels for the patient’s radiation exposure for paediatric CT scans, Decision 9/3020/2015) Original text in Finnish. STUK. https://www.stuk.fi/documents/12547/476916/paatos-9-3020-2015-potilaan-sateilyaltistuksen-vertailutasot-lasten-tietokonetomografiatutkimuksissa.pdf/ad15f18b-b419-4e1f-b448-4c24952a3b26. Accessed 12/27/2016

25.

STUK (Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority) (2013) Potilaan säteilyaltistuksen vertailutasot aikuisten tietokonetomografiatutkimuksissa, päätös 2/3020/2013. (Reference levels for the patient’s radiation exposure for adult CT scans, Decision 2/3020/2013) Original text in Finnish. STUK. https://www.stuk.fi/documents/12547/476916/paatos-2-3020-2013-potilaan-sateilyaltistuksen-vertailutasot-aikuisten-tt-tutkimuksissa.pdf/c5d96888-3ea2-4b41-a23a-a74b1d1bebda. Accessed 12/27/2016

26.

Jackson D, Atkin K, Bettenay F, Clark J, Ditchfield MR, Grimm JE, Linke R, Long G, Onikul E, Pereira J, Phillips M, Wilson F, Paul E, Goergen SK (2015) Paediatric CT dose: a multicentre audit of subspecialty practice in Australia and New Zealand. Eur Radiol 25(11):3109–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3727-y CrossRefPubMed

27.

Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP, Aroua A, Alamo-Maestre LT, Bochud F, Gudinchet F (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18(9):1980–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0963-4 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Buls N, Bosmans H, Mommaert C, Malchair F, Clapuyt P, Everarts P (2010) CT paediatric doses in Belgium: a multi-centre study—results from a dosimetry audit in 2007–2009. Belgian Federal Agency of Nuclear Control (FANC). https://5162.f2w.fedict.be/en/documents/ct-paediatric-doses-belgium-multi-centre-study. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

29.

Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Meeson S, Golding SJ (2014) Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK—2011 review. PHE-CRCE-013. Chilton, Oxforshire

30.

Santos J, Foley S, Paulo G, McEntee MF, Rainford L (2014) The establishment of computed tomography diagnostic reference levels in Portugal. Radiat Prot Dosim 158(3):307–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct226 CrossRef

31.

Austalian radiation protection and nuclear safety agency (ARPANSA) (2016) Current Australian National Diagnostic Reference Levels for MDCT. http://www.arpansa.gov.au/services/ndrl/current.cfm. Accessed 12/26/2016

32.

Roch P, Aubert B (2013) French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004-2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim 154(1):52–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs152 CrossRef

33.

Granata C, Origgi D, Palorini F, Matranga D, Salerno S (2015) Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: results from the first Italian nationwide survey. Pediatr Radiol 45(5):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3201-z CrossRefPubMed

34.

Nievelstein RAJ, van Dam IM, van der Molen AJ (2010) Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol 40(8):1324–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1714-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Rivers-Bowerman MD, Shankar JJ (2014) Iterative reconstruction for head CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality. Can J Neurol Sci 41(05):620–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2014.11 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Mirro AE, Brady SL, Kaufman RA (2016) Full dose-reduction potential of statistical iterative reconstruction for head CT protocols in a predominantly pediatric population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(7):1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4754 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Kroft LJ, Roelofs JJ, Geleijns J (2010) Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16-detector row CT acquisitions. Pediatr Radiol 40(3):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1436-x CrossRefPubMed

39.

Johnston JH, Podberesky DJ, Yoshizumi TT, Angel E, Toncheva G, Larson DB, Egelhoff JC, Anderson-Evans C, Nguyen GB, Barelli A, Alsip C, Salisbury SR, Frush DP (2013) Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT. Pediatr Radiol 43(9):1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2690-5 CrossRefPubMed

40.

European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) The gentle way, the art of pediatric imaging. Vienna, The ESR – European Society of Radiology

41.

De Bondt T, Mulkens T, Zanca F, Pyfferoen L, Casselman JW, Parizel PM (2017) Benchmarking pediatric cranial CT protocols using a dose tracking software system: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol 27(2):841–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4385-4

Title: Dose monitoring in pediatric and young adult head and cervical spine CT studies at two emergency duty departments
Authors: Hannele Niiniviita
Timo Kiljunen
Minna Huuskonen
Simo Teperi
Jarmo Kulmala
Publication date: 01-04-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Emergency Radiology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1571-x

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Dose monitoring in pediatric and young adult head and cervical spine CT studies at two emergency duty departments

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Accuracy of outside radiologists’ reports of computed tomography exams of emergently transferred patients

MDCT of ductus diverticulum: 3D cinematic rendering to enhance understanding of anatomic configuration and avoid misinterpretation as traumatic aortic injury

Clinical and radiological diagnosis of gallstone ileus: a mini review

Osteomyelitis of the lower extremity: pathophysiology, imaging, and classification, with an emphasis on diabetic foot infection

Clinical and imaging features in lung torsion and description of a novel imaging sign

Core curriculum illustration: anterior process fracture of the calcaneus