Top

Surgical Endoscopy

Published in:

01-01-2010

Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Authors: Galal El-Gazzaz, Tracy Hull, Jeffery Hammel, Daniel Geisler

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2010

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to assess the number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer resections.

Methods

Between 1996 and 2007, 431 colorectal cancer patients underwent laparoscopic resection. During the periods of 1996–1997, 2002–2003, and 2006–2007, 243 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were matched 1–2 by age, operation, gender, operation date, body mass index (BMI), and tumor stage (TNM) to 486 patients undergoing open surgery. The numbers of examined and involved LNs were compared according to tumor location and year of surgery.

Results

Colorectal cancer resections (243 laparoscopic and 486 open procedures) were performed for 729 patients (447 men) with a mean age of 66.2 ± 12.3 years and a mean BMI of 28.5 ± 7.3. The mean number of LNs per case was 24.8 ± 20.6. The number of LNs retrieved did not differ between laparoscopic and open surgery (p = 0.4). A significant difference was observed between the number of involved LNs retrieved laparoscopically (2.2 ± 3.8) and the number retrieved by open surgery (1.6 ± 4; p = 0.03). There were significant differences between the numbers of LNs retrieved from the right colon (28.1 ± 14.6), left colon (24.5 ± 17.6), and rectum (19.1 ± 15.1) (p < 0.001). There were significantly fewer examined LNs in laparoscopic than in open cases during 2002 and 2003 (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer can achieve lymph node retrieval similar to that achieved by the open approach. In this era of new technology, laparoscopic lymph node harvest is becoming more optimized.

Hernanz F, Revuelta S, Redondo C, Madrazo C, Castillo J, Gomez-Fleitas M (1994) Colorectal adenocarcinoma: quality of the assessment of lymph node metastases. Dis Colon Rectum 37:373–376CrossRefPubMed

Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma: trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216PubMed

Jha MK, Corbett WA, Wilson RG, Koreli A, Papagrigoriadis S (2006) Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer. Minerva Chir 61:385–391PubMed

Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB, Tom P, Namiki TS (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900PubMed

Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, Fleshman J, Guillem J, Miedema B, Ota D, Sargent D (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J NCI 93:583–596

Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, Francioni G, Accarpio G, Anfossi A et al (2002) Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 235:458–463CrossRefPubMed

Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:414–415CrossRef

Gelos M, Gelhaus J, Mehnert P, Bonhag G, Sand M, Philippou S, Mann B (2008) Factors influencing lymph node harvest in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:53–59CrossRefPubMed

Bilimoria KY, Palis B, Stewart AK, Bentrem DJ, Freel AC, Sigurdson ER, Talamonti MS, Ko CY (2008) Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51:154–161CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG (2005) Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20, 898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 23:8664–8670CrossRefPubMed

11.

Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, Haller DG (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919CrossRefPubMed

12.

Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Gallagher JT, Dejesus S, Narayanan S (2003) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 5:601–611CrossRef

13.

Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Viamonte M, Hartmann RF (2002) Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 45:491–501CrossRefPubMed

14.

Moloo H, Sabri E, Wassif E, Haggar F, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP (2008) Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer: would all patients benefit? Dis Colon Rectum 51:173–180CrossRefPubMed

15.

Polignano F, Henderson N, Alishahi S, Zito A (2006) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer and adequate lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 20:996–997CrossRefPubMed

16.

Jacob BP, Salky B (2005) Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival. Surg Endosc 19:643–649CrossRefPubMed

17.

Falk PM, Beart RW, Wexner S (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 41:832–838CrossRef

18.

Poulin EG, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Gregoire R, Roy N (1999) Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 229:487–492CrossRefPubMed

19.

Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed

20.

Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed

21.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) study group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef

22.

Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 10:7–8CrossRef

23.

Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424CrossRefPubMed

24.

Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:652–656CrossRefPubMed

25.

Reinbach DH, McGregor JR, Murray GD, O’Dwyer PJ (1994) Effect of the surgeon’s specialty interest on the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1020–1023CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jestin P, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U (2005) Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists’ specimen examination. Eur J Cancer 41:2071–2078CrossRefPubMed

27.

Horzic M, Kopljar M (2005) Minimal number of lymph nodes that need to be examined for adequate staging of colorectal cancer factors influencing lymph node harvest. Hepatogastroenterology 52:86–89PubMed

28.

Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6:883–890CrossRefPubMed

29.

Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, Morris AM, Jessurun J, Virnig BA (2005) Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:219–225PubMedCrossRef

30.

Wright FC, Law CH, Last L, Khalifa M, Arnaout A, Naseer Z, Klar N, Gallinger S, Smith AJ (2003) Lymph node retrieval and assessment in stage II colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 10:903–909CrossRefPubMed

31.

Evans MD, Rees A, Stamatakis JD, Karandikar SS (2006) Factors influencing lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its effect on survival. Colorectal Dis 8:721–722CrossRef

32.

Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP, Lube MW (1996) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 39:148–154CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kim SH, Milsom JW, Gramlich TL, Toddy SM, Shore GI, Okuda J, Fazio VW (1998) Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 41:971–978CrossRefPubMed

34.

Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs. later experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596CrossRefPubMed

35.

Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332CrossRefPubMed

Title: Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?
Authors: Galal El-Gazzaz
Tracy Hull
Jeffery Hammel
Daniel Geisler
Publication date: 01-01-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0534-z

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Does a laparoscopic approach affect the number of lymph nodes harvested during curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Umbilicus, navel, belly button—Vitruvian guide for esthetic cosmetics: a Da Vinci code for beautiful informed consent

Geek-speak on “peek port”: hybridizing a hybrid technique not Geeks peak

Use of porcine small intestine submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow up assessment; Surg Endosc (2008) 22: 1941–1946

Is BMI greater than 60 kg/m2 a predictor of higher morbidity after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?

Endoscopic management of eroded prosthesis in vertical banded gastroplasty patients

From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy