Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Contribution

Impact of Tumor Location on Nodal Evaluation for Colon Cancer

Authors: Karl Y. Bilimoria, M.D., Bryan Palis, M.A., Andrew K. Stewart, M.A., David J. Bentrem, M.D., Andrew C. Freel, M.D., Elin R. Sigurdson, M.D., Ph.D., Mark S. Talamonti, M.D., Clifford Y. Ko, M.D., M.S., M.S.H.S.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Adequate lymph node evaluation is important to stage colon cancers and make adjuvant treatment decisions. Studies have demonstrated improved survival when ≥ 12 nodes are examined. Our objective was to assess differences in the adequacy of nodal evaluation for right vs. left colon cancers.

Methods

From the National Cancer Data Base (1998–2004), 142,009 N0M0 colon cancer patients were identified. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the number of nodes examined for right vs. left colectomies. Multivariable modeling was used to determine the impact of examining ≥ 12 nodes on survival.

Results

Of 142,009 patients, 79,444 (56 percent) had right colectomies, and 62,565 (44 percent) patients had left colectomies. More nodes were examined during right colectomies than left (median 12 vs. 8, P < 0.0001). When adjusted for patient, tumor, and hospital factors, patients undergoing left colectomy were less likely to have ≥ 12 nodes identified (P < 0.0001). Patients were more likely to have ≥ 12 nodes identified for right and left colon cancers at high-volume hospitals. Survival was better with examination of ≥ 12 nodes for right and left colon cancers (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Evaluating ≥ 12 nodes for right and left colon cancers is a feasible, clinically relevant, and modifiable factor that will likely improve patient outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chau I, Cunningham D. Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: what, when and how? Ann Oncol 2006;17:1347–59.PubMedCrossRef Chau I, Cunningham D. Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: what, when and how? Ann Oncol 2006;17:1347–59.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRef Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:433–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8706–12.PubMedCrossRef Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8706–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, et al. For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 1998;83:666–72.PubMedCrossRef Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, et al. For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 1998;83:666–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2006;244:602–10.PubMed Chen SL, Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 2006;244:602–10.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg 2002;26:384–9.PubMedCrossRef Cianchi F, Palomba A, Boddi V, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal tumor specimens: recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be examined. World J Surg 2002;26:384–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T. Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 2002;81:63–9.PubMedCrossRef Cserni G, Vinh-Hung V, Burzykowski T. Is there a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be histologically assessed for a reliable nodal staging of T3N0M0 colorectal carcinomas? J Surg Oncol 2002;81:63–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goldstein NS. Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:179–89.PubMedCrossRef Goldstein NS. Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:179–89.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R, Baxter NN. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3570–5.PubMedCrossRef Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R, Baxter NN. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3570–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRef Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2912–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 2002;235:458–63.PubMedCrossRef Prandi M, Lionetto R, Bini A, et al. Prognostic evaluation of stage B colon cancer patients is improved by an adequate lymphadenectomy: results of a secondary analysis of a large scale adjuvant trial. Ann Surg 2002;235:458–63.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:65–71.PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:65–71.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:213–8.PubMedCrossRef Joseph NE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Accuracy of determining nodal negativity in colorectal cancer on the basis of the number of nodes retrieved on resection. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:213–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer, 2002. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Chicago: Springer, 2002.
16.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Compton CC, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:958–65.PubMed Hammond ME, Fitzgibbons PL, Compton CC, et al. College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:958–65.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583–96.PubMedCrossRef Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:583–96.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, et al. Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:219–25.PubMedCrossRef Baxter NN, Virnig DJ, Rothenberger DA, et al. Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:219–25.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, Jones RS. The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol 2004;85:1–3.PubMedCrossRef Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, Jones RS. The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol 2004;85:1–3.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference International Classification of Disease for Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. International Classification of Disease for Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
22.
go back to reference Standards of the Commission on Cancer Volume II: Registry Operations and Data Standards. Vol. II: Commission on Cancer, 1998. Standards of the Commission on Cancer Volume II: Registry Operations and Data Standards. Vol. II: Commission on Cancer, 1998.
23.
go back to reference Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago: Commission on Cancer, 2004. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago: Commission on Cancer, 2004.
25.
go back to reference Miller EA, Woosley J, Martin CF, Sandler RS. Hospital-to-hospital variation in lymph node detection after colorectal resection. Cancer 2004;101:1065–71.PubMedCrossRef Miller EA, Woosley J, Martin CF, Sandler RS. Hospital-to-hospital variation in lymph node detection after colorectal resection. Cancer 2004;101:1065–71.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747–51.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747–51.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 2004;292:847–51.PubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 2004;292:847–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284:3028–35.PubMedCrossRef Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284:3028–35.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rogers SO, Jr., Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2006;244:1003–11.PubMedCrossRef Rogers SO, Jr., Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2006;244:1003–11.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons., WebMD (Firm). ACS surgery: principles & practice. New York: WebMD Corp., 2002:v. American College of Surgeons., WebMD (Firm). ACS surgery: principles & practice. New York: WebMD Corp., 2002:v.
31.
go back to reference Brunicardi FC, Schwartz SI. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill Health Pub. Division, 2005. Brunicardi FC, Schwartz SI. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill Health Pub. Division, 2005.
32.
go back to reference Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005. Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
33.
go back to reference Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001. Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
34.
go back to reference Townsend CM, Sabiston DC. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 17th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004. Townsend CM, Sabiston DC. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 17th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004.
35.
go back to reference Scott KW, Grace RH. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 1989;76:1165–7.PubMedCrossRef Scott KW, Grace RH. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma before and after fat clearance. Br J Surg 1989;76:1165–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Tumor Location on Nodal Evaluation for Colon Cancer
Authors
Karl Y. Bilimoria, M.D.
Bryan Palis, M.A.
Andrew K. Stewart, M.A.
David J. Bentrem, M.D.
Andrew C. Freel, M.D.
Elin R. Sigurdson, M.D., Ph.D.
Mark S. Talamonti, M.D.
Clifford Y. Ko, M.D., M.S., M.S.H.S.
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9114-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2/2008 Go to the issue