Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Original article

Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates

Authors: B. P. Jacob, B. Salky

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colectomy for the management of colon cancer remains a controversial therapeutic option, especially when the outcomes are compared with the historically accepted survival data and recurrence rates after open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic colon resection for invasive colon adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 129 patients underwent consecutive laparoscopic colectomies for colon adenocarcinoma (between April 1992 and 2004 January) by a single surgeon at a single institution. Records were analyzed retrospectively and follow-up data was obtained. The Student t-test, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival data were used for statistical analysis.

Results

After patients with noninvasive disease on final pathology were excluded, the study population comprised 88 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon cancer with > 2 years of follow-up. Of these cases, 81 (93%) were amenable for complete follow-up at 11years (41 women and 40 men; mean age, 76 years). Mean follow-up was 61 months. There was one perioperative death (1.2%), and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 13.6%. The average number of lymph nodes harvested was 10.1 (±6). There were no port site recurrences. The Kaplan-Meier survival data were as follows for 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival, respectively stage I (n = 34) 89% and 89%; stage II (n = 22), 65% and 59%; stage III (n = 19), 72% and 67%; stages I–III combined, (n = 75), 77% and 73%.

Conclusions

For this specific cohort of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic colectomies for invasive colon adenocarcinoma, the mean follow-up was > 5 years. Overall survival and disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer as well as for stages I–III combined are favorable and comparable to historically acceptable open colectomy survival rates. Overall survival and disease-free survival after laparoscopic colectomy for invasive colon cancer is no worse, and perhaps better than, the previously reported rates for the same procedure done by an open technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L, Zuliani, W, Radaelli, G, Gruarin, P, Dellabona, P, DiCarlo, V 2002Laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg236759767 Braga, M, Vignali, A, Gianotti, L, Zuliani, W, Radaelli, G, Gruarin, P, Dellabona, P, DiCarlo, V 2002Laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcomeAnn Surg236759767
2.
go back to reference Chapman, A, Levitt, MD, Hewett, P, Woods, R, Sheiner, H, Maddern, GJ 2001Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic reviewAnn Surg234590606 Chapman, A, Levitt, MD, Hewett, P, Woods, R, Sheiner, H, Maddern, GJ 2001Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic reviewAnn Surg234590606
3.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group1996Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study GroupDis Colon Rectum39S53S58 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group1996Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study GroupDis Colon Rectum39S53S58
4.
go back to reference Franklin, ME, Ramos, R, Rosenthal, D, Schuessler, W 1993Laparoscopic colonic proceduresWorld J Surg175156PubMed Franklin, ME, Ramos, R, Rosenthal, D, Schuessler, W 1993Laparoscopic colonic proceduresWorld J Surg175156PubMed
5.
go back to reference Franklin, ME, Rosenthal, D, Abrego-Medina, D, Dorman, JP, Glass, JL, Norem, R, Diaz, A 1996Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year resultsDis Colon Rectum393546 Franklin, ME, Rosenthal, D, Abrego-Medina, D, Dorman, JP, Glass, JL, Norem, R, Diaz, A 1996Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma: five-year resultsDis Colon Rectum393546
6.
7.
go back to reference Hughes, ES, McDermatt, FT, Polglase, AL, Johnson, WR 1983Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large bowel cancer surgeryDis Colon Rectum26571572PubMed Hughes, ES, McDermatt, FT, Polglase, AL, Johnson, WR 1983Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large bowel cancer surgeryDis Colon Rectum26571572PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, Castells, A, Taura, P, Pique, JM, Visa, J 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trialLancet35922242229PubMed Lacy, AM, Garcia-Valdecasas, JC, Delgado, S, Castells, A, Taura, P, Pique, JM, Visa, J 2002Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trialLancet35922242229PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lechaux, D, Trebuchet, G, Le Calve, JL 2002Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancerSurg Endosc1614091412PubMed Lechaux, D, Trebuchet, G, Le Calve, JL 2002Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancerSurg Endosc1614091412PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lin, K, Ota, DM 2000Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible optionSurg Oncol.9127134PubMed Lin, K, Ota, DM 2000Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible optionSurg Oncol.9127134PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lord, SA, Larach, SW, Ferrara, A, Williamson, PR, Lago, CP, Lube, MW 1996Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma:. a three-year experienceDis Colon Rectum39148154PubMed Lord, SA, Larach, SW, Ferrara, A, Williamson, PR, Lago, CP, Lube, MW 1996Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma:. a three-year experienceDis Colon Rectum39148154PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lumley, JW, Fielding, GA, Rhodes, M, Nathanson, LK, Siu, S, Stitz, RW 1996Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patientsDis Colon Rectum.39155159PubMed Lumley, JW, Fielding, GA, Rhodes, M, Nathanson, LK, Siu, S, Stitz, RW 1996Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patientsDis Colon Rectum.39155159PubMed
13.
go back to reference Nelson, H, Petrelli, N, Carlin, A, Couture, J, Fleshman, J, Guillem, J, Miedema, B 2001Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgeryJ Natl Cancer Inst93583587PubMed Nelson, H, Petrelli, N, Carlin, A, Couture, J, Fleshman, J, Guillem, J, Miedema, B 2001Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgeryJ Natl Cancer Inst93583587PubMed
14.
go back to reference Patankar, SK, Larach, SW, Ferrara, A, Williamson, PR, Gallagher, T, DeJesus, S, Namyanan, S 2003Prospective Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year periodDis Colon Rectum46601611CrossRefPubMed Patankar, SK, Larach, SW, Ferrara, A, Williamson, PR, Gallagher, T, DeJesus, S, Namyanan, S 2003Prospective Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year periodDis Colon Rectum46601611CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Phillips, EH, Franklin, ME, Carroll, BJ, Fallas, MJ, Ramos, R, Rosenthal, R 1992Laparoscopic colectomyAnn Surg216703707PubMed Phillips, EH, Franklin, ME, Carroll, BJ, Fallas, MJ, Ramos, R, Rosenthal, R 1992Laparoscopic colectomyAnn Surg216703707PubMed
16.
go back to reference Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand HS, Bolton J, O’Connell MJ (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer: a rare but perhaps underestimated problem. 39: 200–207 Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand HS, Bolton J, O’Connell MJ (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer: a rare but perhaps underestimated problem. 39: 200–207
17.
go back to reference Stocchi, L, Nelson, H 1998Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial updateJ Surg Onol68255267 Stocchi, L, Nelson, H 1998Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial updateJ Surg Onol68255267
18.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (2003) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2002 Sub (1973–2000), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2003, based on the November 2002 submission. Available online at: http://www.seer.cancer.gov Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (2003) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2002 Sub (1973–2000), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2003, based on the November 2002 submission. Available online at: http://​www.​seer.​cancer.​gov
19.
go back to reference Vukasin, P, Ortega, AE, Greene, FL, Steele, GD, Simons, AJ, Anthone, GJ, Weston, LA, et al. 1996Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons laparoscopic registryDis Colon Rectum392023 Vukasin, P, Ortega, AE, Greene, FL, Steele, GD, Simons, AJ, Anthone, GJ, Weston, LA,  et al. 1996Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons laparoscopic registryDis Colon Rectum392023
20.
go back to reference Wexner, SD, Cohen, SM 1995Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancyBr J Surg82295298PubMed Wexner, SD, Cohen, SM 1995Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancyBr J Surg82295298PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates
Authors
B. P. Jacob
B. Salky
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8921-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2005 Go to the issue