Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Orthopaedics
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Paper

Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Jung-Ro Yoon, Se-Hyun Yang, Young-Soo Shin

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Many studies have found associations between laboratory biomarkers and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but it remains unclear whether these biomarkers are clinically useful in ruling out PJI. This meta-analysis compared the performance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) versus procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of PJI.

Methods

In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated IL-6 or/and PCT as a diagnostic biomarker for PJI and provided sufficient data to permit sensitivity and specificity analyses for each test. The major databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through February 28, 2017. No restrictions were placed on language of publication.

Results

We identified 18 studies encompassing a total of 1,835 subjects; 16 studies reported on IL-6 and 6 studies reported on PCT. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95) for IL-6 and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79–0.86) for PCT. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74–0.89) for IL-6 and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.31–0.81) for PCT. The pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84–0.95) for IL-6 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.63–1.00) for PCT. Both the IL-6 and PCT tests had a high positive likelihood ratio (LR); 9.3 (95% CI, 5.3–16.2) and 12.4 (95% CI, 1.7–89.8), respectively, making them excellent rule-in tests for the diagnosis of PJI. The pooled negative LR for IL-6 was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.12–0.29), making it suitable as a rule-out test, whereas the pooled negative LR for PCT was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25–0.78), making it unsuitable as a rule-out diagnostic tool.

Conclusions

Based on the results of the present meta-analysis, IL-6 has higher diagnostic value than PCT for the diagnosis of PJI. Moreover, the specificity of the IL-6 test is higher than its sensitivity. Conversely, PCT is not recommended for use as a rule-out diagnostic tool.
Literature
1.
Matar WY, Jafari SM, Restrepo C et al (2010) Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(Suppl 2):36–46CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lenski M, Scherer MA (2014) Synovial IL-6 as inflammatory marker in periprosthetic joint infections. J Arthroplast 29(6):1105–1109CrossRef
3.
Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S et al (2006) Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(suppl 4):138–147PubMed
4.
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351(16):1645–1654CrossRefPubMed
5.
Austin MS, Ghanem E, Joshi A et al (2008) A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplast 23(1):65–68CrossRef
6.
Ghanem E, Antoci V, Pulido L et al (2009) The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Int J Infect Dis 13(6):e444–e449CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Parvizi J, Fassihi SC, Enayatollahi MA (2016) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following hip and knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 47(3):505–515CrossRef
9.
10.
Di Cesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF et al (2005) Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):1921–1927CrossRefPubMed
11.
Maharajan K, Patro DK, Menon J et al (2013) Serum procalcitonin is a sensitive and specific marker in the diagnosis of septic arthritis and acute osteomyelitis. J Orthop Surg Res 8(1):19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56(11):1129–1135CrossRefPubMed
15.
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58(9):882–893CrossRefPubMed
16.
Jacovides CL, Parvizi J, Adeli B et al (2011) Molecular markers for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 26(Suppl 6):99–103CrossRef
17.
Abou El-Khier NT, El Ganainy AR, Elgeidy A et al (2013) Assessment of interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of Egyptian patients with periprosthetic joint infection. Egypt J Immunol 20(2):93–99PubMed
18.
Gollwitzer H, Dombrowski Y, Prodinger PM et al (2013) Antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(7):644–651CrossRefPubMed
19.
Elgeidi A, Elganainy AE, Abou Elkhier N et al (2014) Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 38(12):2591–2595CrossRefPubMed
20.
Bottner F, Wegner A, Winkelmann W et al (2007) Interleukin-6, procalcitonin and TNF-alpha: markers of peri-prosthetic infection following total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):94–99CrossRefPubMed
21.
Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P et al (2014) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(11):3254–3262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Glehr M, Friesenbichler J, Hofmann G et al (2013) Novel biomarkers to detect infection in revision hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(8):2621–2628CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Worthington T, Dunlop D, Casey A et al (2010) Serum procalcitonin, interleukin-6, soluble intercellular adhesin molecule-1 and IgG to shortchain exocellular lipoteichoic acid as predictors of infection in total joint prosthesis revision. Br J Biomed Sci 67(2):71–76CrossRefPubMed
24.
Frangiamore SJ, Siqueira MB, Saleh A et al (2016) Synovial cytokines and the MSIS criteria are not useful for determining infection resolution after periprosthetic joint infection explantation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(7):1630–1639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Ettinger M, Calliess T, Kielstein JT et al (2015) Circulating biomarkers for discrimination between aseptic joint failure, low-grade infection and high-grade septic failure. Clin Infect Dis 61:332–341CrossRefPubMed
26.
Randau TM, Friedrich MJ, Wimmer MD et al (2014) Interleukin-6 in serum and in synovial fluid enhances the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening. PloS One 9(2):e89045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Tang X, Wang Q, Wang H et al (2016) [Comparison and estimation of different diagnostic methods in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 54(4):251–257PubMed
28.
Yuan K, Li W-D, Qiang Y et al (2015) Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection before revision total hip arthroplasty. Surg Infect 16(2):146–150CrossRef
29.
Saeed K, Dryden M, Sitjar A et al (2013) Measuring synovial fluid procalcitonin levels in distinguishing cases of septic arthritis, including prosthetic joints, from other causes of arthritis and aseptic loosening. Infection 41(4):845–849CrossRefPubMed
30.
Nilsdotter-Augustinsson A, Briheim G, Herder A et al (2007) Inflammatory response in 85 patients with loosened hip prostheses: a prospective study comparing inflammatory markers in patients with aseptic and septic prosthetic loosening. Acta Orthop 78(5):629–639CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Waddell J, Pritzker KP, Boynton EL (2005) Increased cytokine secretion in patients with failed implants compared with patients with primary implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434(434):170–176CrossRef
33.
Ahmad SS, Shaker A, Saffarini M et al (2016) Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(10):3064–3074CrossRefPubMed
34.
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Jaeschke R (2003) A readers’ guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 29(7):1043–1051CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin in patients with periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Jung-Ro Yoon
Se-Hyun Yang
Young-Soo Shin
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3744-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

International Orthopaedics 6/2018 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Functional outcome after endoscopic assisted release of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: mid-to-long term results

Original Paper

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in children: do osseous abnormalities matter?

Original Paper

Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection following open reduction and internal fixation of adult tibial plateau fractures

Original Paper

“Within ring”-based sacroiliac rod fixation may overcome the weakness of spinopelvic fixation for unstable pelvic ring injuries: technical notes and clinical outcomes

Original Paper

Pre-operative templating for knee arthroplasty shows low accuracy with standard X-rays

Original Paper

Does arthroscopic resection of a too-long anterior process improve static disorders of the foot in children and adolescents?