Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Original Research

Development and Establishment of Initial Validity Evidence for a Novel Tool for Assessing Trainee Admission Notes

Authors: Danielle E. Weber, MD, MEd, Justin D. Held, MD, Roman A. Jandarov, PhD, Matthew Kelleher, MD, MEd, Ben Kinnear, MD, MEd, Dana Sall, MD, MEd, Jennifer K. O’Toole, MD, MEd

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Documentation is a key component of practice, yet few curricula have been published to teach trainees proper note construction. Additionally, a gold standard for assessing note quality does not exist, and no documentation assessment tools integrate with established competency-based frameworks.

Objective

To develop and establish initial validity evidence for a novel tool that assesses key components of trainee admission notes and maps to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone framework.

Design

Using an iterative, consensus building process we developed the Admission Note Assessment Tool (ANAT). Pilot testing was performed with both the supervising attending and study team raters not involved in care of the patients. The finalized tool was piloted with attendings from other institutions.

Participants

Local experts participated in tool development and pilot testing. Additional attending physicians participated in pilot testing.

Main Measures

Content, response process, and internal structure validity evidence was gathered using Messick’s framework. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using percent agreement.

Key Results

The final tool consists of 16 checklist items and two global assessment items. Pilot testing demonstrated rater agreement of 72% to 100% for checklist items and 63% to 70% for global assessment items. Note assessment required an average of 12.3 min (SD 3.7). The study generated validity evidence in the domains of content, response process, and internal structure for use of the tool in rating admission notes.

Conclusions

The ANAT assesses individual components of a note, incorporates billing criteria, targets note “bloat,” allows for narrative feedback, and provides global assessments mapped to the ACGME milestone framework. The ANAT can be used to assess admission notes by any attending and at any time after note completion with minimal rater training. The ANAT allows programs to implement routine note assessment for multiple functions with the use of a single tool.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burke HB, Hoang A, Becher D, et al. QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(5):910–6.CrossRef Burke HB, Hoang A, Becher D, et al. QNOTE: an instrument for measuring the quality of EHR clinical notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(5):910–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Burke HB, Sessums LL, Hoang A, et al. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;22(1):199–205.PubMedPubMedCentral Burke HB, Sessums LL, Hoang A, et al. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;22(1):199–205.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Englander R, Flynn T, Call S. Toward Defining the Foundation of the MD Degree: Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1352–8.CrossRef Englander R, Flynn T, Call S. Toward Defining the Foundation of the MD Degree: Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1352–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):301–3.CrossRef Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):301–3.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stetson PD, Morrison FP, Bakken S, Johnson SB; eNote Research Team. Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):534–541.CrossRef Stetson PD, Morrison FP, Bakken S, Johnson SB; eNote Research Team. Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):534–541.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dean SM, Eickhoff JC, Bakel LA. The effectiveness of a bundled intervention to improve resident progress notes in an electronic health record (EHR). J Hosp Med. 2015;10(2):104–7.CrossRef Dean SM, Eickhoff JC, Bakel LA. The effectiveness of a bundled intervention to improve resident progress notes in an electronic health record (EHR). J Hosp Med. 2015;10(2):104–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stetson PD, Bakken S, Wrenn JO, Siegler EL. Assessing electronic note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inf. 2012;3(2):164–174.CrossRef Stetson PD, Bakken S, Wrenn JO, Siegler EL. Assessing electronic note quality using the physician documentation quality instrument (PDQI-9). Appl Clin Inf. 2012;3(2):164–174.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(4):300–9.CrossRef Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(4):300–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference O'Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, Callahan MA, Adelman RD, Siegler EL. Physicians' attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):63–8.CrossRef O'Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, Callahan MA, Adelman RD, Siegler EL. Physicians' attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):63–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aylor M, Campbell EM, Winter C, Phillipi CA. Resident Notes in an Electronic Health Record: A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Standardized Intervention With Qualitative Analysis. Clin Pediatr. 2017;56(3):257–262.CrossRef Aylor M, Campbell EM, Winter C, Phillipi CA. Resident Notes in an Electronic Health Record: A Mixed-Methods Study Using a Standardized Intervention With Qualitative Analysis. Clin Pediatr. 2017;56(3):257–262.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hommos MS, Kuperman EF, Kamath A, Kreiter CD. The Development and Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing Residents’ Discharge Summaries. Acad Med. 2017;92(4):550–5.CrossRef Hommos MS, Kuperman EF, Kamath A, Kreiter CD. The Development and Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing Residents’ Discharge Summaries. Acad Med. 2017;92(4):550–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bierman JA, Hufmeyer KK, Liss DT, Weaver AC, Heiman HL. Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(4):420–432.CrossRef Bierman JA, Hufmeyer KK, Liss DT, Weaver AC, Heiman HL. Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(4):420–432.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application. Am J of Med. 2006;199(2):166.e7–177.e16.CrossRef Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments: Theory and Application. Am J of Med. 2006;199(2):166.e7–177.e16.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Innes JE, Booher DE. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems. J Am Plan Assoc. 1999;65(4):412–423.CrossRef Innes JE, Booher DE. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems. J Am Plan Assoc. 1999;65(4):412–423.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–214.CrossRef Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–214.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–9.CrossRef de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chen MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–16.CrossRef Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chen MK, et al. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–16.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, Snell L, Frank JR, ICBME Collaborators. A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):574–81.CrossRef Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Englander R, Snell L, Frank JR, ICBME Collaborators. A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):574–81.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD, et al. Entrustment and Mapping of Observable Practice Activities for Resident Assessment. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(8):1177–82.CrossRef Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD, et al. Entrustment and Mapping of Observable Practice Activities for Resident Assessment. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(8):1177–82.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Warm EJ, Held JD, Hellmann M, et al. Entrusting Observable Practice Activities and Milestones Over the 36 Months of an Internal Medicine Residency. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1398–1405.CrossRef Warm EJ, Held JD, Hellmann M, et al. Entrusting Observable Practice Activities and Milestones Over the 36 Months of an Internal Medicine Residency. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1398–1405.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kinnear B, Bensman R, Held J, O’Toole J, Schauer D, Warm E. Critical Deficiency Ratings in Milestone Assessment: A Review and Case Study. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):820–6.CrossRef Kinnear B, Bensman R, Held J, O’Toole J, Schauer D, Warm E. Critical Deficiency Ratings in Milestone Assessment: A Review and Case Study. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):820–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Establishment of Initial Validity Evidence for a Novel Tool for Assessing Trainee Admission Notes
Authors
Danielle E. Weber, MD, MEd
Justin D. Held, MD
Roman A. Jandarov, PhD
Matthew Kelleher, MD, MEd
Ben Kinnear, MD, MEd
Dana Sall, MD, MEd
Jennifer K. O’Toole, MD, MEd
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05669-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2020 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.