Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: a retrospective study

Authors: Zeynep Çoban Büyükbayraktar, Hasan Camcı

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate effects of the Myobrace and Twin-block appliances. The second was to compare them in terms of ease of use by assessing the factors that may influence patient compliance.

Methods

The study included thirty-six Class II division 1 patients (19 females, 17 males; mean age, 12.14 ± 1.23) who had previously been treated in the Orthodontic Clinic at Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: Myobrace (n = 18), and Group 2: twin block (n = 18). The effects of the appliances on the skeletal, dentoalveolar, soft tissue, craniocervical, and other anatomic structures were assessed using 46 measurements (22 linear and 24 angular), on pre and post-treatment cephalometric radiographs. AudaxCeph 5.0 software (Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used for the analysis. To analyze the changes after one year of treatment, a paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used. Intergroup comparison was performed using the Student t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

In the Myobrace and Twin-block groups, there was a significant increase in SNB (°) (p = 0.004, p = 0.001), IMPA (°) (p = 0.005, p = 0.001) and a significant drop in U1/SN (°) (p = 0.021, p = 0.005). The lengths of Cd–Gn (mm), Go–Pg (mm), and Cd–Go (mm) increased significantly in the Twin-block group (p = 0.003, p = 0.010, p = 0.001), whereas the Myobrace group did not change. Similarly, there was no significant difference in pharyngeal and soft palate measurements in the Myobrace group but a statistically significant decrease in SP length and angle in the Twin-block group (p = 0.001, p = 0.006). Increases in SN/OPT (°) (p = 0.032, p = 0.001) and SN/CVT (°) (p = 0.012, p = 0.001) were statistically significant in both groups. Myobrace was more difficult to use while sleeping, whereas the twin block caused more nausea.

Conclusions

Both appliances can be used for mandibular advancement. The Twin-block appliance, on the other hand, was more effective and patient-friendly.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baka ZM, Fidanboy MO. Pharyngeal airway, hyoid bone, and soft palate changes after Class II treatment with Twin-block and Forsus appliances during the postpeak growth period. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159:148–57.CrossRef Baka ZM, Fidanboy MO. Pharyngeal airway, hyoid bone, and soft palate changes after Class II treatment with Twin-block and Forsus appliances during the postpeak growth period. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2021;159:148–57.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stockfisch H. The principles and practice of dentofacial orthopaedics. Berlin: Quintessence Pub.; 1995. Stockfisch H. The principles and practice of dentofacial orthopaedics. Berlin: Quintessence Pub.; 1995.
3.
go back to reference Fränkel R. Possibilities of a late basal development of the mandible through the rearrangement of the bite by means of a functional regulator. Dtsch Stomatol. 1971;21:198–202. Fränkel R. Possibilities of a late basal development of the mandible through the rearrangement of the bite by means of a functional regulator. Dtsch Stomatol. 1971;21:198–202.
4.
go back to reference Clark W. The Twin-block technique: a functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93:1–18.CrossRef Clark W. The Twin-block technique: a functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93:1–18.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:599.e1–12.CrossRef Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:599.e1–12.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tallgren A, Christiansen RL, Ash MM Jr, Miller RL. Effects of a myofunctional appliance on orofacial muscle activity and structures. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:249–58. Tallgren A, Christiansen RL, Ash MM Jr, Miller RL. Effects of a myofunctional appliance on orofacial muscle activity and structures. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:249–58.
7.
go back to reference Hashish DI, Mostafa YA. Effect of lip bumpers on mandibular arch dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:106–9.CrossRef Hashish DI, Mostafa YA. Effect of lip bumpers on mandibular arch dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:106–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anastasi G, Dinnella A. Myobrace system: a no-braces approach to malocclusion and a myofunctional therapy device. Webmedcentral. 2014. Anastasi G, Dinnella A. Myobrace system: a no-braces approach to malocclusion and a myofunctional therapy device. Webmedcentral. 2014.
9.
go back to reference Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Guray E. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II division 1 patients. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:605–9. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Guray E. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II division 1 patients. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:605–9.
10.
go back to reference Čirgić E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K. Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.CrossRef Čirgić E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K. Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Elhamouly Y, El-Housseiny AA, Ismail HA, El Habashy LM. Myofunctional trainer versus Twin-block in developing Class II division I malocclusion: a randomized comparative clinical trial. Dent J. 2020;8:44.CrossRef Elhamouly Y, El-Housseiny AA, Ismail HA, El Habashy LM. Myofunctional trainer versus Twin-block in developing Class II division I malocclusion: a randomized comparative clinical trial. Dent J. 2020;8:44.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Soft-and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:21–8.CrossRef Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Soft-and hard-tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with Activator versus Trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41:21–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johnson JS, Satyaprasad S, Chandra HS, Havaldar KS, Raj A, Suresh N. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using Twin-block appliance and Myobrace system on Class II division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:S10–7.CrossRef Johnson JS, Satyaprasad S, Chandra HS, Havaldar KS, Raj A, Suresh N. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using Twin-block appliance and Myobrace system on Class II division I malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14:S10–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:598–605.CrossRef Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:598–605.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kannan A, Sathyanarayana HP, Padmanabhan S. Effect of functional appliances on the airway dimensions in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6:54–64.CrossRef Kannan A, Sathyanarayana HP, Padmanabhan S. Effect of functional appliances on the airway dimensions in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6:54–64.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK. Effects of Twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in Class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:1–8.CrossRef Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK. Effects of Twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in Class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:1–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eun-Suk A, Ah-Hyeon K, Youn-Soo S, So-Youn A. Oropharyngeal airway three-dimensional changes after treatment with myobrace in Class II retrognathic children. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46:265–7. Eun-Suk A, Ah-Hyeon K, Youn-Soo S, So-Youn A. Oropharyngeal airway three-dimensional changes after treatment with myobrace in Class II retrognathic children. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46:265–7.
18.
go back to reference Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KW, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Gresham H, Smithells P. Cervical and mandibular posture. Dent Rec. 1954;74:261–4. Gresham H, Smithells P. Cervical and mandibular posture. Dent Rec. 1954;74:261–4.
20.
go back to reference Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin-block appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:663–84.CrossRef Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin-block appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:663–84.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Šidlauskienė M, Smailienė D, Lopatienė K, Čekanauskas E, Pribuišienė R, Šidlauskas M. Relationships between malocclusion, body posture, and nasopharyngeal pathology in pre-orthodontic children. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1765–73.CrossRef Šidlauskienė M, Smailienė D, Lopatienė K, Čekanauskas E, Pribuišienė R, Šidlauskas M. Relationships between malocclusion, body posture, and nasopharyngeal pathology in pre-orthodontic children. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:1765–73.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kamal AT, Fida M. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with Twin-block appliances: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;155:656–61.CrossRef Kamal AT, Fida M. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with Twin-block appliances: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2019;155:656–61.CrossRef
24.
26.
go back to reference Shin J-H, Kim M-A, Park I-Y, Park Y-H. A 2-year follow-up of changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism: 3-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume and hyoid bone position. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:340e1–9.CrossRef Shin J-H, Kim M-A, Park I-Y, Park Y-H. A 2-year follow-up of changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism: 3-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume and hyoid bone position. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:340e1–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, Wang L, Lin J. Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:115–21.CrossRef Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, Wang L, Lin J. Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of Class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:115–21.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dedhiya N, Pradhan T, Sethia A. Assessment of airway dimensions and hyoid bone position in Class II patients treated with fixed Twin-block and forsus fatigue resistant device−a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Sci. 2020;12:131–8. Dedhiya N, Pradhan T, Sethia A. Assessment of airway dimensions and hyoid bone position in Class II patients treated with fixed Twin-block and forsus fatigue resistant device−a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Sci. 2020;12:131–8.
29.
go back to reference Verma G, Tandon P, Nagar A, Singh GP, Singh A. Cephalometric evaluation of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal spaces following treatment with Twin-block appliance. J Orthod Sci. 2012;1:77–82.CrossRef Verma G, Tandon P, Nagar A, Singh GP, Singh A. Cephalometric evaluation of hyoid bone position and pharyngeal spaces following treatment with Twin-block appliance. J Orthod Sci. 2012;1:77–82.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in Class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:588–94.CrossRef Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in Class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:588–94.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bavbek NC, Tuncer BB, Turkoz C, Ulusoy C, Tuncer C. Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following Class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:1747–55.CrossRef Bavbek NC, Tuncer BB, Turkoz C, Ulusoy C, Tuncer C. Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following Class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:1747–55.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D. Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:260–4.CrossRef Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D. Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:260–4.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Idris G, Hajeer M, Al-Jundi A. Acceptance and discomfort in growing patients during treatment with two functional appliances: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:219–24. Idris G, Hajeer M, Al-Jundi A. Acceptance and discomfort in growing patients during treatment with two functional appliances: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:219–24.
34.
go back to reference Mandall N, Matthew S, Fox D, Wright J, Conboy F, O’Brien K. Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: Are quality of life measures important? Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:40–5.CrossRef Mandall N, Matthew S, Fox D, Wright J, Conboy F, O’Brien K. Prediction of compliance and completion of orthodontic treatment: Are quality of life measures important? Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:40–5.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Efendiyeva R, Aydemir H, Karasu H, Toygar-Memikoğlu U. Pharyngeal airway space, hyoid bone position, and head posture after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Class III patients: long-term evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:773–81.CrossRef Efendiyeva R, Aydemir H, Karasu H, Toygar-Memikoğlu U. Pharyngeal airway space, hyoid bone position, and head posture after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Class III patients: long-term evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:773–81.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment-effects on compliance and prediction of patients’ adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:307–15.CrossRef Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment-effects on compliance and prediction of patients’ adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:307–15.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5:194–7.CrossRef Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5:194–7.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z. Content validity index in scale development. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37:152–5. Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z. Content validity index in scale development. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37:152–5.
39.
go back to reference Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:907–14.CrossRef Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:907–14.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Büyükerkmen A, Sari Z. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:87–93.CrossRef Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Büyükerkmen A, Sari Z. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:87–93.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:293–302.CrossRef Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:293–302.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Pavoni C, Lombardo EC, Franchi L, Lione R, Cozza P. Treatment and post-treatment effects of functional therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class II subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;101:47–50.CrossRef Pavoni C, Lombardo EC, Franchi L, Lione R, Cozza P. Treatment and post-treatment effects of functional therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class II subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;101:47–50.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Effectiveness of Twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:728–34.CrossRef Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK. Effectiveness of Twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:728–34.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Rizk S, Kulbersh VP, Al-Qawasmi R. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of Class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:955–61.CrossRef Rizk S, Kulbersh VP, Al-Qawasmi R. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of Class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:955–61.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Schafer RC. Clinical biomechanics: musculoskeletal actions and reactions. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1987. Schafer RC. Clinical biomechanics: musculoskeletal actions and reactions. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1987.
46.
go back to reference Springate S. A re-investigation of the relationship between head posture and craniofacial growth. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:397–409.CrossRef Springate S. A re-investigation of the relationship between head posture and craniofacial growth. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:397–409.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Aglarci C. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with Twin-block appliances. J Orthod Res. 2016;4:8–12.CrossRef Aglarci C. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with Twin-block appliances. J Orthod Res. 2016;4:8–12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dentoalveolar, skeletal, pharyngeal airway, cervical posture, hyoid bone position, and soft palate changes with Myobrace and Twin-block: a retrospective study
Authors
Zeynep Çoban Büyükbayraktar
Hasan Camcı
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02773-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue