Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 7/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Article

Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device

Authors: Nehir Canigur Bavbek, Burcu Balos Tuncer, Cagri Turkoz, Cagri Ulusoy, Cumhur Tuncer

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of fixed functional therapy on oropharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone positions in Class II patients and make comparison with an untreated Class II group.

Materials and methods

Eighteen patients (8 girls, 10 boys; mean age 13.62 ± 1.92 years) who were treated with Forsus Fatique Resistant Device (FFRD) and 19 patients (11 girls, 8 boys; mean age 12.74 ± 0.91 years) who served as control were enrolled. Cephalograms were used to assess linear, angular, and area measurements. Intragroup comparisons were made by paired t and Wilcoxon tests and intergroup comparisons were performed by independent t test.

Results

With respect to controls, FFRD group showed increased airway dimensions at soft palate (P < 0.05) and more forward positioning of the hyoid bone (P < 0.05). Dentoalveolar changes exhibited mesial movement of lower incisors and molars and reduction in overjet (P < 0.001) in FFRD group.

Conclusions

Positive effects in oropharyngeal airway dimensions and increased values of hyoid bone displacement to a more forward position were found after fixed functional therapy.

Clinical Relevance

Treatment with fixed functional appliances is mostly based on mesial movement of mandibular dentition, which might influence changes in tongue posture. The present results might indicate that oropharyngeal airway dimensions may be affected by postural changes of the hyoid bone in consequence of dentoalveolar changes. Clinically, these may be considered especially in Class II cases with reduced airway dimensions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McNamara Jr JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202PubMed McNamara Jr JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202PubMed
2.
go back to reference Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant’ Anna EF (2013) Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:799–809CrossRef Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Ruellas AC, Sant’ Anna EF (2013) Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:799–809CrossRef
3.
go back to reference El H, Palomo JM (2013) An airway study of different maxillary and mandibular sagittal positions. Eur J Orthod 35:262–270CrossRefPubMed El H, Palomo JM (2013) An airway study of different maxillary and mandibular sagittal positions. Eur J Orthod 35:262–270CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gunay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D (2011) Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus(™) FRD. Eur J Dent 5:423–432PubMedPubMedCentral Gunay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D (2011) Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsus(™) FRD. Eur J Dent 5:423–432PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Franchi L, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Defraia E, Baccetti T (2011) Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in class II patients. Angle Orthod 81:678–683CrossRefPubMed Franchi L, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Defraia E, Baccetti T (2011) Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in class II patients. Angle Orthod 81:678–683CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Restrepo C, Santamaria A, Pelaez S, Tapias A (2011) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil 38:588–594CrossRefPubMed Restrepo C, Santamaria A, Pelaez S, Tapias A (2011) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil 38:588–594CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhou L, Zhao Z, Lu D (2000) The analysis of the changes of tongue shape and position, hyoid position in class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with functional appliances (FR-I). Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 18:123–125PubMed Zhou L, Zhao Z, Lu D (2000) The analysis of the changes of tongue shape and position, hyoid position in class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with functional appliances (FR-I). Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 18:123–125PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hanggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomaki TA (2008) Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 30:598–605CrossRefPubMed Hanggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomaki TA (2008) Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 30:598–605CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gögen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E (1998) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod 68:327–336PubMed Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gögen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E (1998) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod 68:327–336PubMed
10.
go back to reference O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:128–137CrossRef O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, et al. (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:128–137CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D (2006) Forsus nitinol flat spring and jasper jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76:666–672CrossRefPubMed Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D (2006) Forsus nitinol flat spring and jasper jumper corrections of class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 76:666–672CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I (2011) Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:616–625CrossRef Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I (2011) Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:616–625CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR (2008) Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod 78:332–328CrossRefPubMed Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR (2008) Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod 78:332–328CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M (2014) Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod 84:76–87CrossRefPubMed Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M (2014) Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod 84:76–87CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cacciatore G, Ghislanzoni LT, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Franchi L (2014) Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod 84:1010–1017CrossRefPubMed Cacciatore G, Ghislanzoni LT, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Franchi L (2014) Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod 84:1010–1017CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Servello DF, Fallis DW, Alvetro L (2015) Analysis of class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status. Angle Orthod 85:80–86CrossRefPubMed Servello DF, Fallis DW, Alvetro L (2015) Analysis of class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status. Angle Orthod 85:80–86CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bilgiç F, Başaran G, Hamamci O (2015) Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Clin Oral Investig 19:445–451CrossRefPubMed Bilgiç F, Başaran G, Hamamci O (2015) Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions. Clin Oral Investig 19:445–451CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Germec-Cakan D, Taner T, Akan S (2011) Uvulo-glossopharyngeal dimensions in non-extraction, extraction with minimum anchorage, and extraction with maximum anchorage. Eur J Orthod 33:515–520CrossRefPubMed Germec-Cakan D, Taner T, Akan S (2011) Uvulo-glossopharyngeal dimensions in non-extraction, extraction with minimum anchorage, and extraction with maximum anchorage. Eur J Orthod 33:515–520CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK (2013) Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod 83:728–734CrossRefPubMed Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK (2013) Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod 83:728–734CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J (2011) Effects of fixed appliances in correcting angle class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance—a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 72:301–320CrossRefPubMed Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J (2011) Effects of fixed appliances in correcting angle class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance—a retrospective cephalometric study. J Orofac Orthop 72:301–320CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D (2014) Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod 84:260–264CrossRefPubMed Ozdemir F, Ulkur F, Nalbantgil D (2014) Effects of fixed functional therapy on tongue and hyoid positions and posterior airway. Angle Orthod 84:260–264CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li Y (2009) Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion may be effective to prevent the potential for OSAHS and snoring. Med Hypotheses 73:594–595CrossRefPubMed Li Y (2009) Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion may be effective to prevent the potential for OSAHS and snoring. Med Hypotheses 73:594–595CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, Delamare EL, Silveira HD, Dutra V, Silveira HE (2012) A comparative study of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomographic images in upper airway assessment. Eur J Orthod 34:390–393CrossRefPubMed Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, Delamare EL, Silveira HD, Dutra V, Silveira HE (2012) A comparative study of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomographic images in upper airway assessment. Eur J Orthod 34:390–393CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pirila-Parkkinen K, Löppönen H, Nieminen P, Tolonen U, Paakkö E, Pirttiniemi P (2011) Validity of upper airway assessment in children: a clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study. Angle Orthod 81:433–439CrossRefPubMed Pirila-Parkkinen K, Löppönen H, Nieminen P, Tolonen U, Paakkö E, Pirttiniemi P (2011) Validity of upper airway assessment in children: a clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study. Angle Orthod 81:433–439CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LS, Park YH (2011) Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial patterns. Angle Orthod 81:1075–1082CrossRefPubMed Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LS, Park YH (2011) Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial patterns. Angle Orthod 81:1075–1082CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D (2009) Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:468–479CrossRef Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D (2009) Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 135:468–479CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA (2008) Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134:125–137CrossRef Stahl F, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA (2008) Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134:125–137CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, Zhang SJ, Cao C, Wei F, et al. (2012) Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients. Angle Orthod 82:964–970CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Hong L, Wang CL, Zhang SJ, Cao C, Wei F, et al. (2012) Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients. Angle Orthod 82:964–970CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Muto T, Yamasaki A, Takeda S (2008) A cephalometric evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with mandibular retrognathia and prognathia, and normal subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:228–231CrossRefPubMed Muto T, Yamasaki A, Takeda S (2008) A cephalometric evaluation of the pharyngeal airway space in patients with mandibular retrognathia and prognathia, and normal subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:228–231CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, Wang L, Lin J (2012) Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod 82:115–121CrossRefPubMed Wang Q, Jia P, Anderson NK, Wang L, Lin J (2012) Changes of pharyngeal airway size and hyoid bone position following orthodontic treatment of class I bimaxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod 82:115–121CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device
Authors
Nehir Canigur Bavbek
Burcu Balos Tuncer
Cagri Turkoz
Cagri Ulusoy
Cumhur Tuncer
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1659-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Clinical Oral Investigations 7/2016 Go to the issue