Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Dementia | Research

Developing a shortened version of the dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS-TC) with a sample in Taiwan: an item response theory approach

Authors: Su-Pin Hung, Yi-Han Liao, Claire Eccleston, Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The 25-item Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS2) is a widely used tool for measuring knowledge of dementia. To increase the applicability of the Chinese-language version of the tool (DKAS-TC) for the general public, this study aimed to develop a shortened version using the item response theory (IRT) approach.

Methods

A total of 401 participants voluntarily completed a Chinese-language version of the DKAS2 questionnaire (DKAS-TC) at the start of dementia awareness training courses in 2020 and 2021. The four Rasch family models were used to analyze the dimensionality of the shortened scale (the DKAS-s) and to confirm its accuracy in measuring dementia knowledge.

Results

The results justified supported the use of a dichotomous response scale for responding to the DKAS-s and demonstrated good fit of the data to a Rasch model with the four dimensions of “Causes and Characteristics”, “Communication and Engagement”, “Care Needs”, and “Risks and Health Promotion”. Moreover, we shortened the DKAS-TC by selecting items that had both above-average discriminative ability and above-average information. The DKAS-s retained 64.13% of the information contained in the DKAS-TC, resulting in a 16-item scale which retained four items in each of the original four dimensions. The DKAS-s also correlated highly (≥0.95) with the DKAS-TC and exhibited a sizeable range of difficulty of dementia knowledge.

Conclusions

The DKAS-s is expected to be more efficient in field settings while retaining an acceptable level of psychometric properties when used as a survey instrument to measure the general public’s knowledge of dementia.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Choi SK, Rose ID, Friedman DB. How is literacy being defined and measured in dementia research? A scoping review. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018;4:2333721418812246.PubMedPubMedCentral Choi SK, Rose ID, Friedman DB. How is literacy being defined and measured in dementia research? A scoping review. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018;4:2333721418812246.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Cahill S, Pierce M, Werner P, Darley A, Bobersky A. A systematic review of the public's knowledge and understanding of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015;29(3):255–75.CrossRefPubMed Cahill S, Pierce M, Werner P, Darley A, Bobersky A. A systematic review of the public's knowledge and understanding of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015;29(3):255–75.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Carpenter BD, Balsis S, Otilingam PG, Hanson PK, Gatz M. The Alzheimer's disease knowledge scale: development and psychometric properties. Gerontologist. 2009;49(2):236–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carpenter BD, Balsis S, Otilingam PG, Hanson PK, Gatz M. The Alzheimer's disease knowledge scale: development and psychometric properties. Gerontologist. 2009;49(2):236–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Resciniti NV, Tang W, Tabassum M, Pearson JL, Spencer SM, Lohman MC, et al. Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: a scoping review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;20(5):397–413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Resciniti NV, Tang W, Tabassum M, Pearson JL, Spencer SM, Lohman MC, et al. Knowledge evaluation instruments for dementia caregiver education programs: a scoping review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;20(5):397–413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kuhn D, King SP, Fulton BR. Development of the knowledge about memory loss and care (KAML-C) test. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2005;20(1):41–9.CrossRef Kuhn D, King SP, Fulton BR. Development of the knowledge about memory loss and care (KAML-C) test. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2005;20(1):41–9.CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Annear MJ, Toye CM, Eccleston CE, McInerney FJ, Elliott KE, Tranter BK, et al. Dementia knowledge assessment scale: development and preliminary psychometric properties. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2375–81.CrossRefPubMed Annear MJ, Toye CM, Eccleston CE, McInerney FJ, Elliott KE, Tranter BK, et al. Dementia knowledge assessment scale: development and preliminary psychometric properties. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2375–81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Spector A, Orrell M, Schepers A, Shanahan N. A systematic review of ‘knowledge of dementia’ outcome measures. Ageing Res Rev. 2012;11(1):67–77.CrossRefPubMed Spector A, Orrell M, Schepers A, Shanahan N. A systematic review of ‘knowledge of dementia’ outcome measures. Ageing Res Rev. 2012;11(1):67–77.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Annear MJ, Eccleston CE, McInerney FJ, Elliott KE, Toye CM, Tranter BK, et al. A new standard in dementia knowledge measurement: comparative validation of the dementia knowledge assessment scale and the Alzheimer's disease knowledge scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(6):1329–34.CrossRefPubMed Annear MJ, Eccleston CE, McInerney FJ, Elliott KE, Toye CM, Tranter BK, et al. A new standard in dementia knowledge measurement: comparative validation of the dementia knowledge assessment scale and the Alzheimer's disease knowledge scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(6):1329–34.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Annear MJ, Toye C, Elliott KJ, McInerney F, Eccleston C, Robinson A. Dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS): confirmatory factor analysis and comparative subscale scores among an international cohort. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Annear MJ, Toye C, Elliott KJ, McInerney F, Eccleston C, Robinson A. Dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS): confirmatory factor analysis and comparative subscale scores among an international cohort. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Chang CY, Hsu HC. Relationship between knowledge and types of attitudes towards people living with dementia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang CY, Hsu HC. Relationship between knowledge and types of attitudes towards people living with dementia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3777.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Eccleston CE, Ding Y, Shan Y, Liu L, Chan HYL. Validation of a Chinese version of the dementia knowledge assessment scale in healthcare providers in China. J Clin Nurs. 2020;31:1776–85.CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Eccleston CE, Ding Y, Shan Y, Liu L, Chan HYL. Validation of a Chinese version of the dementia knowledge assessment scale in healthcare providers in China. J Clin Nurs. 2020;31:1776–85.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sung H-C, Su H-F, Wang H-M, Koo M, Lo RY. Psychometric properties of the dementia knowledge assessment scale-traditional Chinese among home care workers in Taiwan. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sung H-C, Su H-F, Wang H-M, Koo M, Lo RY. Psychometric properties of the dementia knowledge assessment scale-traditional Chinese among home care workers in Taiwan. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):515.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46(Pt 1):1–18.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hung HY, Hung SP, Chang YJ. Development and validation of the prenatal activity restriction stress questionnaire: a Rasch rating scale analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hung HY, Hung SP, Chang YJ. Development and validation of the prenatal activity restriction stress questionnaire: a Rasch rating scale analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Hung SP. Validating the creative self-efficacy student scale with a Taiwanese sample: an item response theory-based investigation. Think Skills Creat. 2018;27:190–203.CrossRef Hung SP. Validating the creative self-efficacy student scale with a Taiwanese sample: an item response theory-based investigation. Think Skills Creat. 2018;27:190–203.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hung SP, Wu CL. Cognitive component analysis comparing three Chinese remote associates tests: linear logistic latent trait model approach. Creat Res J. 2021;33(3):224–34.CrossRef Hung SP, Wu CL. Cognitive component analysis comparing three Chinese remote associates tests: linear logistic latent trait model approach. Creat Res J. 2021;33(3):224–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lin CY, Hou WL, Mamun MA, Aparecido da Silva J, Broche-Pérez Y, Ullah I, et al. Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) across countries: measurement invariance issues. Nurs Open. 2021;8(4):1892–908.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin CY, Hou WL, Mamun MA, Aparecido da Silva J, Broche-Pérez Y, Ullah I, et al. Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) across countries: measurement invariance issues. Nurs Open. 2021;8(4):1892–908.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Broström A, Ulander M, Nilsen P, Lin CY, Pakpour AH. Development and psychometric evaluation of the motivation to use CPAP scale (MUC-S) using factorial structure and Rasch analysis among patients with obstructive sleep apnea before CPAP treatment is initiated. Sleep Breath. 2021;25(2):627–37.CrossRefPubMed Broström A, Ulander M, Nilsen P, Lin CY, Pakpour AH. Development and psychometric evaluation of the motivation to use CPAP scale (MUC-S) using factorial structure and Rasch analysis among patients with obstructive sleep apnea before CPAP treatment is initiated. Sleep Breath. 2021;25(2):627–37.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hambleton R, Robin F, Xing D. Item response models for the analysis of educational and psychological test data. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown SD, editors. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. San Diego: Academic; 2012. Hambleton R, Robin F, Xing D. Item response models for the analysis of educational and psychological test data. In: Tinsley HEA, Brown SD, editors. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. San Diego: Academic; 2012.
24.
go back to reference Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. 1st ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. 1st ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000.
25.
go back to reference de Ayala RJ. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. de Ayala RJ. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008.
26.
go back to reference Kim S, Feldt LS. The estimation of the IRT reliability coefficient and its lower and upper bounds, with comparisons to CTT reliability statistics. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2010;11(2):179–88.CrossRef Kim S, Feldt LS. The estimation of the IRT reliability coefficient and its lower and upper bounds, with comparisons to CTT reliability statistics. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2010;11(2):179–88.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chiesi F, Morsanyi K, Donati MA, Primi C. Applying item response theory to develop a shortened version of the need for cognition scale. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018;14(3):75–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chiesi F, Morsanyi K, Donati MA, Primi C. Applying item response theory to develop a shortened version of the need for cognition scale. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2018;14(3):75–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Sekely A, Taylor GJ, Bagby RM. Developing a short version of the Toronto structured interview for alexithymia using item response theory. Psychiatry Res. 2018;266:218–27.CrossRefPubMed Sekely A, Taylor GJ, Bagby RM. Developing a short version of the Toronto structured interview for alexithymia using item response theory. Psychiatry Res. 2018;266:218–27.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Lancaster AR, Drasgow F, Fitzgerald LF. Toward standardized measurement of sexual harassment: shortening the SEQ-DoD using item response theory. Mil Psychol. 2002;14(1):49–72.CrossRef Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Lancaster AR, Drasgow F, Fitzgerald LF. Toward standardized measurement of sexual harassment: shortening the SEQ-DoD using item response theory. Mil Psychol. 2002;14(1):49–72.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–74.CrossRef Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–74.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960/1980; 1993. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960/1980; 1993.
32.
go back to reference Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19(6):716–23.CrossRef Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19(6):716–23.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schwarz GE. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–4.CrossRef Schwarz GE. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–4.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maydeu-Olivares A, Joe H. Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika. 2006;71(4):713–32.CrossRef Maydeu-Olivares A, Joe H. Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika. 2006;71(4):713–32.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Maydeu-Olivares A. Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2013;11(3):71–101. Maydeu-Olivares A. Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2013;11(3):71–101.
36.
go back to reference Lt H, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef Lt H, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bock RD, Mislevy RJ. Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psychol Meas. 1982;6(4):431–44.CrossRef Bock RD, Mislevy RJ. Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psychol Meas. 1982;6(4):431–44.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Linacre JM. What do Infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Meas Trans. 2002;16(2):878. Linacre JM. What do Infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Meas Trans. 2002;16(2):878.
39.
go back to reference Adams RJ, Wu ML, Wilson MR. ACER ConQuest 3.0.1. [Computer software]. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd.; 2012. Adams RJ, Wu ML, Wilson MR. ACER ConQuest 3.0.1. [Computer software]. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd.; 2012.
40.
go back to reference Chalmers P. Multidimensional Item Response Theory. In: Package ‘mirt’ User Guide 1.37.1; 2022. Chalmers P. Multidimensional Item Response Theory. In: Package ‘mirt’ User Guide 1.37.1; 2022.
41.
go back to reference Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1982. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1982.
42.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory, vol. 2. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Fundamentals of item response theory, vol. 2. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.
44.
go back to reference Veerkamp WJ, Berger MP. Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. J Educ Behav Stat. 1997;22(2):203–26.CrossRef Veerkamp WJ, Berger MP. Some new item selection criteria for adaptive testing. J Educ Behav Stat. 1997;22(2):203–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing a shortened version of the dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS-TC) with a sample in Taiwan: an item response theory approach
Authors
Su-Pin Hung
Yi-Han Liao
Claire Eccleston
Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Dementia
Dementia
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03596-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Geriatrics 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine