Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Implementing personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a process evaluation of the PROSPER feasibility trial

Authors: Nicky Kime, Alan Wright, Anne Heaven, Rebecca Hawkins, Jane Smith, Bonnie Cundill, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Lawton, Amanda Farrin, Claire Hulme, Andrew Clegg

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Personalised Care Planning (PCP) is a collaborative approach used in the management of chronic conditions. Core components of PCP are shared decision making to achieve joint goal setting and action planning by the clinician and patient. We undertook a process evaluation within the PROSPER feasibility trial to understand how best to implement PCP for older people with frailty in the community.

Methods

The trial was set in two localities in England. We observed training sessions and intervention delivery at three time points during the 12-week intervention period. We interviewed delivery teams before, during and after the intervention period, as well as primary care staff. We interviewed older people who had received, declined or withdrawn from PCP. We explored training of staff delivering PCP, structures, mechanisms and resources needed for delivery, and influences on uptake. We undertook a framework approach to data analysis.

Findings

We observed thirteen training sessions and interviewed seven delivery staff, five primary care staff, and twenty older people, including seven who had declined or withdrawn from the intervention. Delivery teams successfully acquired skills and knowledge, but felt underprepared for working with people with lower levels of frailty. Timing of training was critical and ‘top-ups’ were needed. Engagement with primary care staff was tenuous. Older people with lower frailty were unclear of the intervention purpose and benefits, goal setting and action planning.

Conclusions

PCP has the potential to address the individualised needs of older people with frailty. However, training requires careful tailoring and is ideally on-going. Considerable efforts are required to integrate statutory and voluntary stakeholders, understanding the expectations and contributions of each agency from the outset. In addition, older people with frailty need time and support to adjust to new ways of thinking about their own health now and in the future so they can participate in shared decision making. These key factors will be essential when developing models of care for delivering PCP to support older people with frailty to sustain their independence and quality of life.

Trial registration

ISRCTN 12,363,970 – 08/11/2018.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Burt J, Roland M, Paddison C, Reeves D, Campbell J, Abel G, et al. Prevalence and benefits of care plans and care planning for people with long-term conditions in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(Suppl 1):64–71.CrossRef Burt J, Roland M, Paddison C, Reeves D, Campbell J, Abel G, et al. Prevalence and benefits of care plans and care planning for people with long-term conditions in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(Suppl 1):64–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Chew-Graham C, et al. Implementation of self-management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2013;346:2882.CrossRef Kennedy A, Bower P, Reeves D, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Chew-Graham C, et al. Implementation of self-management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2013;346:2882.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peyrot M, Burns K, Davies M, Forbes A, Hermanns N, Holtf R, et al. Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): A multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:174–84.CrossRef Peyrot M, Burns K, Davies M, Forbes A, Hermanns N, Holtf R, et al. Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): A multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues in diabetes and person-centred diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:174–84.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan R, Molloy W, Clegg A, Rockwood K, et al. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021;50:96–104.CrossRef O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan R, Molloy W, Clegg A, Rockwood K, et al. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. 2021;50:96–104.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Heaven A, Bower P, Cundill B, Farrin A, Foster M, Foy R, et al. Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6(1):56.CrossRef Heaven A, Bower P, Cundill B, Farrin A, Foster M, Foy R, et al. Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6(1):56.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Spradley JP. Participant observation. Illinois: Waveland Press; 2016. Spradley JP. Participant observation. Illinois: Waveland Press; 2016.
20.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
21.
go back to reference Lee G. Training match and mismatch as a driver of key employee behaviours. Hum. 2015;25(4):478–95. Lee G. Training match and mismatch as a driver of key employee behaviours. Hum. 2015;25(4):478–95.
22.
go back to reference Stanhope V, Ross A, Choy-Brown M, Jessell L. A mixed methods study of organizational readiness for change and leadership during a training initiative within community mental health clinics. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46:678–87.CrossRef Stanhope V, Ross A, Choy-Brown M, Jessell L. A mixed methods study of organizational readiness for change and leadership during a training initiative within community mental health clinics. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46:678–87.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Barnett M, Brookman-Frazee L, Ragan J, Saifan D, Stadnick N, Lau A. How intervention and implementation characteristics relate to community therapists’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices. A mixed-methods study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017;44(6):824–37.CrossRef Barnett M, Brookman-Frazee L, Ragan J, Saifan D, Stadnick N, Lau A. How intervention and implementation characteristics relate to community therapists’ attitudes toward evidence-based practices. A mixed-methods study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017;44(6):824–37.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bosco A, Paulauskaite L, Hall I, Crabree J, Soni S, Biswas A, et al. Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of PBS-based staff training for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability. PLoS One. 2018;14(8):e0221507.CrossRef Bosco A, Paulauskaite L, Hall I, Crabree J, Soni S, Biswas A, et al. Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of PBS-based staff training for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability. PLoS One. 2018;14(8):e0221507.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Fitzgerald S, Geaney F, Kelly C, Mchugh S, Perry I. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing complex workplace dietary interventions: process evaluation results of a cluster controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16:139.CrossRef Fitzgerald S, Geaney F, Kelly C, Mchugh S, Perry I. Barriers to and facilitators of implementing complex workplace dietary interventions: process evaluation results of a cluster controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;16:139.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Matthews E, Stanhope V, Choy-Brown M, Doherty M. Do providers know what they do not know? A correlational study of knowledge acquisition and person-centered care. Community Ment. 2018;54(5):514–20.CrossRef Matthews E, Stanhope V, Choy-Brown M, Doherty M. Do providers know what they do not know? A correlational study of knowledge acquisition and person-centered care. Community Ment. 2018;54(5):514–20.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Powell B, Waltz T, Chinman M, Damschroder L, Smith J, Matthieu M, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1.CrossRef Powell B, Waltz T, Chinman M, Damschroder L, Smith J, Matthieu M, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Gardner C, et al. Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implement Sci. 2014;9:129.CrossRef Kennedy A, Rogers A, Chew-Graham C, Blakeman T, Bowen R, Gardner C, et al. Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients. Implement Sci. 2014;9:129.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Boeckxstaens P, Willems S, Lansesens M, Decuypere C, Brusselle G, Kuhlein T, et al. A qualitative interpretation of challenges associated with helping patients with multiple chronic diseases identify their goals. J Comorb. 2016;6(2):120–6.CrossRef Boeckxstaens P, Willems S, Lansesens M, Decuypere C, Brusselle G, Kuhlein T, et al. A qualitative interpretation of challenges associated with helping patients with multiple chronic diseases identify their goals. J Comorb. 2016;6(2):120–6.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Miller W, Yahne C, Moyers T, Martinez J, Pirritano M. A Randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:1050–63 (Cited in Welch G, Rose G, Ernst D. Motivational Interviewing and Diabetes: What is it, how is it used, and does it work? Diabetes Spectr. 2006; 19(1):5–11).CrossRef Miller W, Yahne C, Moyers T, Martinez J, Pirritano M. A Randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:1050–63 (Cited in Welch G, Rose G, Ernst D. Motivational Interviewing and Diabetes: What is it, how is it used, and does it work? Diabetes Spectr. 2006; 19(1):5–11).CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Deblendorf C, Epstein R, Marrin K, White J, Frosch D. Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centred care across the spectrum of health care problems. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):270–5.CrossRef Elwyn G, Deblendorf C, Epstein R, Marrin K, White J, Frosch D. Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centred care across the spectrum of health care problems. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(3):270–5.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, et al. Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:165.CrossRef Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, et al. Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:165.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ahmed S, Airlie J, Clegg A, Copsey B, Cundill B, Forster A, et al. A new opportunity for enhancing trial efficiency: can we investigate intervention implementation processes within trials using SWAT (study within a trial) methodology? Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843221080734. Ahmed S, Airlie J, Clegg A, Copsey B, Cundill B, Forster A, et al. A new opportunity for enhancing trial efficiency: can we investigate intervention implementation processes within trials using SWAT (study within a trial) methodology? Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2022. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2632084322108073​4.
Metadata
Title
Implementing personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a process evaluation of the PROSPER feasibility trial
Authors
Nicky Kime
Alan Wright
Anne Heaven
Rebecca Hawkins
Jane Smith
Bonnie Cundill
Robbie Foy
Rebecca Lawton
Amanda Farrin
Claire Hulme
Andrew Clegg
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03426-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Geriatrics 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine