Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Original Research Article

Defining Treatment Response to Donepezil in Alzheimer’s Disease

Responder Analysis of Patient-Level Data from Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies

Authors: Prof. Alistair Burns, Andrew Yeates, Latif Akintade, Megan del Valle, Richard Y. Zhang, Elias M. Schwam, Carlos A. Perdomo

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Defining treatment success in progressive diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), can be challenging.
Objective: To explore the impact of employing different criteria to define a treatment ‘responder’ using analyses of patient-level data from randomized, placebo-controlled studies of donepezil in AD.
Methods: Trials were included in the analysis if they met several criteria, including the following: randomized, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil 10 mg/day in mild-to-moderate AD; cognition measured by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); and a 24-week endpoint and outcomes that included global assessments. Definitions of response were: improvements in cognition plus one other domain; improvement in cognition only; improvement or improvement/no change in global response; and improvement/stabilization/less than expected decline by ≤2 or ≤4 or ≤6 points on the ADAS-cog.
Results: Five studies identified from the literature search met the specified criteria for inclusion. The response to donepezil measured by ADAS-cog varied from 26% to 63% and that of placebo from 14% to 47%, depending on the definition of improvement used. For definitions that included a less than expected decline on ADAS-cog, the more modest the effect defined, the less the drug versus placebo difference and the higher the percentage of patients meeting this definition.
Conclusions: The definition of treatment ‘response’ in a progressive neurodegenerative disease can encompass a variety of outcomes, including short-term improvement, longer-term stabilization and a slowed decline in one or more clinically relevant symptoms or symptom domains. The ability to identify groups of people who respond to donepezil underscores the clinical utility of the medication and may contribute to more focused assessments of the cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366: 2112–7PubMedCrossRef Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005; 366: 2112–7PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Loy C, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001747 Loy C, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (4): CD001747
3.
go back to reference Birks J, Grimley EJ, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4): CD001191 Birks J, Grimley EJ, Iakovidou V, et al. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4): CD001191
4.
go back to reference Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD001190 Birks JS, Harvey R. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD001190
5.
go back to reference McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2): CD003154 McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (2): CD003154
6.
go back to reference Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331: 321–7PubMedCrossRef Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt HP, et al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2005; 331: 321–7PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pelosi AJ, McNulty SV, Jackson GA. Role of cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia care needs rethinking. BMJ 2006; 333: 491–3PubMedCrossRef Pelosi AJ, McNulty SV, Jackson GA. Role of cholinesterase inhibitors in dementia care needs rethinking. BMJ 2006; 333: 491–3PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Karlawish JH, Klocinski JL, Merz J, et al. Caregivers’ preferences for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2000; 55: 1008–14PubMedCrossRef Karlawish JH, Klocinski JL, Merz J, et al. Caregivers’ preferences for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2000; 55: 1008–14PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Farlow MR, Hake A, Messina J, et al. Response of patients with Alzheimer disease to rivastigmine treatment is predicted by the rate of disease progression. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 417–22PubMedCrossRef Farlow MR, Hake A, Messina J, et al. Response of patients with Alzheimer disease to rivastigmine treatment is predicted by the rate of disease progression. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 417–22PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Doraiswamy PM, Leon J, Cummings JL, et al. Prevalence and impact of medical comorbidity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M173–7PubMedCrossRef Doraiswamy PM, Leon J, Cummings JL, et al. Prevalence and impact of medical comorbidity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M173–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Butters MA, Lopez OL, Becker JT. Focal temporal lobe dysfunction in probable Alzheimer’s disease predicts a slow rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 1996; 46: 687–92PubMedCrossRef Butters MA, Lopez OL, Becker JT. Focal temporal lobe dysfunction in probable Alzheimer’s disease predicts a slow rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 1996; 46: 687–92PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, et al. Neurophysiological predictors of long term response to AChE inhibitors in AD patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1064–9PubMedCrossRef Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, et al. Neurophysiological predictors of long term response to AChE inhibitors in AD patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1064–9PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Adler G, Brassen S, Chwalek K, et al. Prediction of treatment response to rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 292–4PubMed Adler G, Brassen S, Chwalek K, et al. Prediction of treatment response to rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 292–4PubMed
14.
go back to reference Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany Jr GP, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Neurology 2002; 58: 169–78PubMedCrossRef Goodin DS, Frohman EM, Garmany Jr GP, et al. Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Neurology 2002; 58: 169–78PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tuite P, Riss J. Recent developments in the pharmacological treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003; 12: 1335–52PubMedCrossRef Tuite P, Riss J. Recent developments in the pharmacological treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003; 12: 1335–52PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Winblad B, Brodaty H, Gauthier S, et al. Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease: is there a need to redefine treatment success? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16: 653–66PubMedCrossRef Winblad B, Brodaty H, Gauthier S, et al. Pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer’s disease: is there a need to redefine treatment success? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16: 653–66PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lopez OL, Becker JT, Saxton J, et al. Alteration of a clinically meaningful outcome in the natural history of Alzheimer’s disease by cholinesterase inhibition. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 83–7PubMedCrossRef Lopez OL, Becker JT, Saxton J, et al. Alteration of a clinically meaningful outcome in the natural history of Alzheimer’s disease by cholinesterase inhibition. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 83–7PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57: 489–95PubMedCrossRef Winblad B, Engedal K, Soininen H, et al. A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD. Neurology 2001; 57: 489–95PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7: 293–303PubMed Rogers SL, Friedhoff LT. The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: results of a US multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Donepezil Study Group. Dementia 1996; 7: 293–303PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50: 136–45PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS, et al. A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Donepezil Study Group. Neurology 1998; 50: 136–45PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1021–31PubMedCrossRef Rogers SL, Doody RS, Mohs RC, et al. Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1021–31PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10: 237–44PubMedCrossRef Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J, et al. The effects of donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 1999; 10: 237–44PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Greenberg SM, Tennis MK, Brown LB, et al. Donepezil therapy in clinical practice: a randomized crossover study. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 94–9PubMedCrossRef Greenberg SM, Tennis MK, Brown LB, et al. Donepezil therapy in clinical practice: a randomized crossover study. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 94–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11: 299–313PubMedCrossRef Homma A, Takeda M, Imai Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil on cognitive and global function in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japan. E2020 Study Group. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000; 11: 299–313PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57: 481–8PubMedCrossRef Mohs RC, Doody RS, Morris JC, et al. A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients. Neurology 2001; 57: 481–8PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gauthier S, Feldman H, Hecker J, et al. Functional, cognitive and behavioral effects of donepezil in patients with moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18: 347–54PubMedCrossRef Gauthier S, Feldman H, Hecker J, et al. Functional, cognitive and behavioral effects of donepezil in patients with moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18: 347–54PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Krishnan KR, Charles HC, Doraiswamy PM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of donepezil on neuronal markers and hippocampal volumes in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 2003–11PubMedCrossRef Krishnan KR, Charles HC, Doraiswamy PM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of donepezil on neuronal markers and hippocampal volumes in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 2003–11PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2105–15PubMedCrossRef Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, et al. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2105–15PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Holmes C, Wilkinson D, Dean C, et al. The efficacy of donepezil in the treatment of neuropsychiatrie symptoms in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2004; 63: 214–9PubMedCrossRef Holmes C, Wilkinson D, Dean C, et al. The efficacy of donepezil in the treatment of neuropsychiatrie symptoms in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2004; 63: 214–9PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Seltzer B, Zolnouni P, Nunez M, et al. Efficacy of donepezil in early-stage Alzheimer disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 1852–6PubMedCrossRef Seltzer B, Zolnouni P, Nunez M, et al. Efficacy of donepezil in early-stage Alzheimer disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 1852–6PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Defining Treatment Response to Donepezil in Alzheimer’s Disease
Responder Analysis of Patient-Level Data from Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies
Authors
Prof. Alistair Burns
Andrew Yeates
Latif Akintade
Megan del Valle
Richard Y. Zhang
Elias M. Schwam
Carlos A. Perdomo
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200825080-00007

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Drugs & Aging 8/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.