Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2016

Open Access 01-03-2016 | Paediatric

Dedicated sub 0.1 mSv 3DCT using MBIR in children with suspected craniosynostosis: quality assessment

Authors: Caroline W. Ernst, Tine L. Hulstaert, Dries Belsack, Nico Buls, Gert Van Gompel, Koenraad H. Nieboer, Ronald Buyl, Filip Verhelle, Michel De Maeseneer, Johan de Mey

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To retrospectively compare image quality of a lowered dose CT protocol to a standard CT protocol in children with suspicion of craniosynostosis.

Methods

Forty-eight patients (age 0- 35 months), who presented with a cranial deformity underwent cranial 3D CT to assess sutural patency: between 2009 – 2010, 24 patients were imaged with a standard protocol (CTDIvol 32.18 mGy), from 2011-2012, 24 underwent a low dose protocol (0.94 mGy) combined with iterative reconstruction. Image quality was evaluated by both expert reading and objective analysis. Differences were assessed by independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, interreader agreement by Cohen's Kappa test.

Results

Effective dose of the low dose protocol was 0.08 mSv, corresponding to a reduction of 97 %. Image quality was similar in both groups in terms of overall diagnostic acceptability, objective noise measurements, subjective cranial bone edge sharpness and presence of artefacts. For objective sharpness of cranial bone-brain interface and subjective perception of noise, the images of the low dose protocol were superior. For all evaluated structures, interreader agreement was moderate to almost perfect.

Conclusion

In the diagnosis of craniosynostosis in children with cranial deformities, a dedicated sub 0.1 mSv cranial 3DCT protocol can be used without loss in image quality.

Key Points

3DCT is used for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis.
Imaging protocols should be optimized to minimize radiation exposure to children.
Combining 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction can help to reduce dose.
A sub 0.1 mSv cranial 3DCT protocol can be used without loss of diagnostic quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vasquez JL, Pombar MA, Pumar JM, del Campo VM (2013) Optimized low-dose multidetector CT protocol for children with cranial deformity. Eur Radiol 23:2279–2287CrossRef Vasquez JL, Pombar MA, Pumar JM, del Campo VM (2013) Optimized low-dose multidetector CT protocol for children with cranial deformity. Eur Radiol 23:2279–2287CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Badve CA, Mallikarjunappa MK, Iyer RS, Ishak GE, Khanna PC (2013) Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 43(6):728–742, quiz 5-7 CrossRefPubMed Badve CA, Mallikarjunappa MK, Iyer RS, Ishak GE, Khanna PC (2013) Craniosynostosis: imaging review and primer on computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 43(6):728–742, quiz 5-7 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Frush DP, Applegate KE (2011) 3 radiation risk from medical imaging: a special need to focus on children. Evidence-based imaging: improving the quality of imaging in patient care. Springer, New York, pp 27–41 Frush DP, Applegate KE (2011) 3 radiation risk from medical imaging: a special need to focus on children. Evidence-based imaging: improving the quality of imaging in patient care. Springer, New York, pp 27–41
5.
go back to reference Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112(4):951–957CrossRefPubMed Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112(4):951–957CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR 194(4):868–873CrossRefPubMed Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC et al (2010) Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR 194(4):868–873CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357(22):2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357(22):2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176(2):289–296CrossRefPubMed Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176(2):289–296CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Paterson A, Frush DP (2007) Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62(6):507–517CrossRefPubMed Paterson A, Frush DP (2007) Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62(6):507–517CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mulkens T, Salgado R, Bellinck P Dose optimizations and reduction in CT of the brain and head and neck region. Dose reduction in multi-detector computed tomography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Mulkens T, Salgado R, Bellinck P Dose optimizations and reduction in CT of the brain and head and neck region. Dose reduction in multi-detector computed tomography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
13.
go back to reference Mieville FA, Berteloot L, Grandjean A et al (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric chest CT: assessment of image quality in a prospective study of children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Radiol 43(5):558–567CrossRefPubMed Mieville FA, Berteloot L, Grandjean A et al (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric chest CT: assessment of image quality in a prospective study of children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Radiol 43(5):558–567CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623CrossRefPubMed Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23(2):360–366CrossRefPubMed Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X (2013) Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 23(2):360–366CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 23(6):1623–1631CrossRefPubMed Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 23(6):1623–1631CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Deak A, Grimm J, Treitl M et al (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 266(1):197–206CrossRefPubMed Deak A, Grimm J, Treitl M et al (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 266(1):197–206CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 47(8):482–489CrossRefPubMed Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study. Invest Radiol 47(8):482–489CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR (2013) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. Phys Med PM Int J Devoted Appl Phys Med Biol Off J Ital Assoc Biomed Phys 29(1):99–110 Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Brunelle F, Bochud FO, Verdun FR (2013) Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. Phys Med PM Int J Devoted Appl Phys Med Biol Off J Ital Assoc Biomed Phys 29(1):99–110
20.
go back to reference Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B et al (2012) Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR 33(2):218–224CrossRefPubMed Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B et al (2012) Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR 33(2):218–224CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. AJNR 34(1):205–211CrossRefPubMed Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. AJNR 34(1):205–211CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37(5):360–363PubMed
23.
go back to reference Craven CM, Naik KS, Blanshard KS (1995) Multispiral three-dimensional computed tomography in the investigation of craniosynostosis: technique optimization. Br J Radiol 68:724–730CrossRefPubMed Craven CM, Naik KS, Blanshard KS (1995) Multispiral three-dimensional computed tomography in the investigation of craniosynostosis: technique optimization. Br J Radiol 68:724–730CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Applegate KE, Thomas K (2011) Pediatric CT--the challenge of dose records. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):523–527CrossRefPubMed Applegate KE, Thomas K (2011) Pediatric CT--the challenge of dose records. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):523–527CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics Rev Publ RSNA, Inc 24(6):1679–1691CrossRef Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics Rev Publ RSNA, Inc 24(6):1679–1691CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2012) CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging Med 4(2):229–240CrossRef Boas FE, Fleischmann D (2012) CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques. Imaging Med 4(2):229–240CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Calandrelli R, D’Apolito G, Gaudino S (2014) Radiological assessment of skull base changes in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: role of “minor” sutures. Neuroradiology 56:865–875CrossRefPubMed Calandrelli R, D’Apolito G, Gaudino S (2014) Radiological assessment of skull base changes in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: role of “minor” sutures. Neuroradiology 56:865–875CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dedicated sub 0.1 mSv 3DCT using MBIR in children with suspected craniosynostosis: quality assessment
Authors
Caroline W. Ernst
Tine L. Hulstaert
Dries Belsack
Nico Buls
Gert Van Gompel
Koenraad H. Nieboer
Ronald Buyl
Filip Verhelle
Michel De Maeseneer
Johan de Mey
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3870-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

European Radiology 3/2016 Go to the issue