Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Imaging 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Research article

Assessment of perineural spread in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas treated with immunotherapy

Authors: Karda Cavanagh, Luke S. McLean, Annette M. Lim, Anthony Cardin, Sidney M. Levy, Danny Rischin

Published in: Cancer Imaging | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) has a propensity for perineural spread (PNS) which is associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Immunotherapy is the new standard of care treatment for advanced CSCC resulting in durable responses. PNS is not captured by traditional response assessment criteria used in clinical trials, e.g. RECIST 1.1, and there is limited literature documenting radiological PNS responses to immunotherapy. In this study we assess PNS responses to immunotherapy using a modified grading system.

Methods

This is an Australian single-center retrospective review of patients with advanced CSCC who were treated with immunotherapy between April 2018 and February 2022 who had evidence of PNS on pre-treatment magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI). The primary outcome was blinded overall radiological response in PNS using graded radiological criteria, post-commencement of immunotherapy. Three defined timepoints (< 5 months, 5–10 months, > 10 months) were reviewed. Secondary outcomes included a correlation between RECIST 1.1 and PNS assessments and the assessment of PNS on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

Results

Twenty CSCC patients treated with immunotherapy were identified. Median age was 75.7 years and 75% (n = 15) were male. All patients had locoregionally advanced disease and no distant metastases. Median follow-up was 18.5 months (range: 2–59). 70% (n = 14) demonstrated a PNS response by 5 months. Three patients experienced pseudoprogression. One patient had PNS progression by the end of study follow up. RECIST 1.1 and PNS responses were largely concordant at > 10 months (Cohen’s Kappa 0.62). 5/14 cases had features suspicious for PNS on FDG-PET/CT.

Conclusions

PNS response to immunotherapy can be documented on MRI using graded radiological criteria. High response rates were seen in PNS with the use of immunotherapy in this cohort and these responses were largely concordant with RECIST 1.1 assessments. FDG-PET/CT demonstrated limited sensitivity in the detection of PNS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Urban K, Mehrmal S, Uppal P, et al. The global burden of skin cancer: A longitudinal analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990–2017. JAAD Int. 2021;2:98–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Urban K, Mehrmal S, Uppal P, et al. The global burden of skin cancer: A longitudinal analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1990–2017. JAAD Int. 2021;2:98–108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, et al. Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(10):1081–6.CrossRefPubMed Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Feldman SR, et al. Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(10):1081–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. PD-1 Blockade with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):341–51.CrossRefPubMed Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. PD-1 Blockade with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):341–51.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rischin D, Migden MR, Lim AM, et al. Phase 2 study of cemiplimab in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: primary analysis of fixed-dosing, long-term outcome of weight-based dosing. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1): e000775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rischin D, Migden MR, Lim AM, et al. Phase 2 study of cemiplimab in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: primary analysis of fixed-dosing, long-term outcome of weight-based dosing. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1): e000775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Grob JJ, Gonzalez R, Basset-Seguin N, et al. Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase II Trial (KEYNOTE-629). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2916–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grob JJ, Gonzalez R, Basset-Seguin N, et al. Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase II Trial (KEYNOTE-629). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(25):2916–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Migden MR, Khushalani NI, Chang ALS, et al. Cemiplimab in locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: results from an open-label, phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):294–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Migden MR, Khushalani NI, Chang ALS, et al. Cemiplimab in locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: results from an open-label, phase 2, single-arm trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):294–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Rischin D, Khushalani NI, Schmults CD, et al. Integrated analysis of a phase 2 study of cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of outcomes and quality of life analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(8):e002757.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rischin D, Khushalani NI, Schmults CD, et al. Integrated analysis of a phase 2 study of cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of outcomes and quality of life analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(8):e002757.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Goepfert H, Dichtel WJ, Medina JE, et al. Perineural invasion in squamous cell skin carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1984;148(4):542–7.CrossRefPubMed Goepfert H, Dichtel WJ, Medina JE, et al. Perineural invasion in squamous cell skin carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1984;148(4):542–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(4):1061–9.CrossRefPubMed Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49(4):1061–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Erkan S, Savundra JM, Wood B, et al. Clinical perineural invasion of the trigeminal and facial nerves in cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Outcomes and prognostic implications of multimodality and salvage treatment. Head Neck. 2017;39(7):1280–6.CrossRefPubMed Erkan S, Savundra JM, Wood B, et al. Clinical perineural invasion of the trigeminal and facial nerves in cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Outcomes and prognostic implications of multimodality and salvage treatment. Head Neck. 2017;39(7):1280–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tang C, Fischbein NJ, Murphy JD, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for retreatment of gross perineural invasion in recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;36(3):293–8.CrossRefPubMed Tang C, Fischbein NJ, Murphy JD, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for retreatment of gross perineural invasion in recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;36(3):293–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Warren TA, Nagle CM, Bowman J, et al. The Natural History and Treatment Outcomes of Perineural Spread of Malignancy within the Head and Neck. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77(2):107–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warren TA, Nagle CM, Bowman J, et al. The Natural History and Treatment Outcomes of Perineural Spread of Malignancy within the Head and Neck. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77(2):107–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al. Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Stage II to IV Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1557–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gross ND, Miller DM, Khushalani NI, et al. Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Stage II to IV Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1557–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Wu MP, Reinshagen KL, Cunnane MB, et al. Clinical Perineural Invasion and Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(6):1213–8.CrossRefPubMed Wu MP, Reinshagen KL, Cunnane MB, et al. Clinical Perineural Invasion and Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(6):1213–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Laine FJ, Braun IF, Jensen ME, et al. Perineural tumor extension through the foramen ovale: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;174(1):65–71.CrossRefPubMed Laine FJ, Braun IF, Jensen ME, et al. Perineural tumor extension through the foramen ovale: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;174(1):65–71.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nemzek WR, Hecht S, Gandour-Edwards R, et al. Perineural spread of head and neck tumors: how accurate is MR imaging? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(4):701–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Nemzek WR, Hecht S, Gandour-Edwards R, et al. Perineural spread of head and neck tumors: how accurate is MR imaging? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(4):701–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Ong CK, Chong VF. Imaging of perineural spread in head and neck tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10A(1S):S92–8.CrossRef Ong CK, Chong VF. Imaging of perineural spread in head and neck tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10A(1S):S92–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chang PC, Fischbein NJ, McCalmont TH, et al. Perineural spread of malignant melanoma of the head and neck: clinical and imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(1):5–11.PubMedPubMedCentral Chang PC, Fischbein NJ, McCalmont TH, et al. Perineural spread of malignant melanoma of the head and neck: clinical and imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(1):5–11.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Carter RL, Foster CS, Dinsdale EA, et al. Perineural spread by squamous carcinomas of the head and neck: a morphological study using antiaxonal and antimyelin monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Pathol. 1983;36(3):269–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carter RL, Foster CS, Dinsdale EA, et al. Perineural spread by squamous carcinomas of the head and neck: a morphological study using antiaxonal and antimyelin monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Pathol. 1983;36(3):269–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Barakos JA, Dillon WP, Chew WM. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;179(1):191–8.CrossRefPubMed Barakos JA, Dillon WP, Chew WM. Orbit, skull base, and pharynx: contrast-enhanced fat suppression MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;179(1):191–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lim AM, Cavanagh K, Hicks RJ, et al. Delayed Response After Confirmed Progression (DR) and Other Unique Immunotherapy-Related Treatment Concepts in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 656611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim AM, Cavanagh K, Hicks RJ, et al. Delayed Response After Confirmed Progression (DR) and Other Unique Immunotherapy-Related Treatment Concepts in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 656611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122s–50s.CrossRefPubMed Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122s–50s.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, et al. Common patterns of perineural spread in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma identified on fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med. 2016;31(4):274–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, et al. Common patterns of perineural spread in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma identified on fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med. 2016;31(4):274–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Paes FM, Singer AD, Checkver AN, et al. Perineural Spread in Head and Neck Malignancies: Clinical Significance and Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Radiographics. 2013;33(6):1717–36.CrossRefPubMed Paes FM, Singer AD, Checkver AN, et al. Perineural Spread in Head and Neck Malignancies: Clinical Significance and Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Radiographics. 2013;33(6):1717–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of perineural spread in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas treated with immunotherapy
Authors
Karda Cavanagh
Luke S. McLean
Annette M. Lim
Anthony Cardin
Sidney M. Levy
Danny Rischin
Publication date
01-12-2024

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Cancer Imaging 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine