Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Cough | Commentary

Gathering Structured Patient Insight to Drive the PRO Strategy in COPD: Patient-Centric Drug Development from Theory to Practice

Authors: Francesco Patalano, Florian S. Gutzwiller, Bhavik Shah, Chitresh Kumari, Nigel S. Cook

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

We illustrate our experience of gathering patient insights on the most patient-relevant symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) via a structured and systematic approach towards ‘patient-centric’ drug development, leveraging recent advances in digital technologies using online platforms. The four-step approach comprised the following: literature search, social media listening (SML) study, online bulletin board (OBB) exercise, and design of an online patient preference study (PPS). The initial online studies (SML and OBB) revealed that, besides dyspnoea and exacerbations, patients perceive cough and mucus production as equally important aspects of disease management for COPD. To further build and quantify patients’ understanding of the importance of these symptoms, an online patient preference survey is underway. Based on these findings, we have elected to include the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire or CASA-Q, a validated instrument to collect patient-reported outcomes (PRO), besides the use of the COPD assessment test or CAT to assess the severity and impact of COPD in drug development studies for COPD. Additionally, to capture movement and sleep disturbance, we consider the inclusion of actigraphy as a digital evidence-capture end point. Lastly, in a phase II trial, a survey questionnaire on incontinence will be administered to evaluate the importance of this issue among patients. We believe that integrating insights derived from “online” studies (SML, OBB, and PPS) into drug development offers an opportunity to truly listen to patients’ voices in early product design ensuring relevance of end points selected for the clinical trial program. This approach also has the potential to complement conventional qualitative and quantitative data collection requirements for PRO instrument development. While awaiting final guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, the recently released draft documents on collecting representative patients’ input reference social media as a tool to collect qualitative patient preference data and these developments suggest that patient preference data can influence future clinical trial design, end point selection, and regulatory reviews.
Funding: Novartis Pharma AG, Basel.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Borup G, Bach KF, Schmiegelow M, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Bjerrum OJ, Westergaard N. A paradigm shift towards patient involvement in medicines development and regulatory science: workshop proceedings and commentary. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50(3):304–11.PubMed Borup G, Bach KF, Schmiegelow M, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Bjerrum OJ, Westergaard N. A paradigm shift towards patient involvement in medicines development and regulatory science: workshop proceedings and commentary. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50(3):304–11.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lowe MM, Blaser DA, Cone L, Arcona S, Ko J, Sasane R, et al. Increasing patient involvement in drug development. Value Health. 2016;19(6):869–78.CrossRef Lowe MM, Blaser DA, Cone L, Arcona S, Ko J, Sasane R, et al. Increasing patient involvement in drug development. Value Health. 2016;19(6):869–78.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cook N, Gey J, Oezel B, Mackay AJ, Kumari C, Kaur VP, et al. Impact of cough and mucus on COPD patients: primary insights from an exploratory study with an online patient community. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019;14:1365.CrossRef Cook N, Gey J, Oezel B, Mackay AJ, Kumari C, Kaur VP, et al. Impact of cough and mucus on COPD patients: primary insights from an exploratory study with an online patient community. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019;14:1365.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Svedsater H, Roberts J, Patel C, Macey J, Hilton E, Bradshaw L. Life impact and treatment preferences of individuals with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from qualitative interviews and focus groups. Adv Ther. 2017;34:1466–81.CrossRef Svedsater H, Roberts J, Patel C, Macey J, Hilton E, Bradshaw L. Life impact and treatment preferences of individuals with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from qualitative interviews and focus groups. Adv Ther. 2017;34:1466–81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pisa G, Freytag S, Schandry R. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients’ disease-related preferences. Patient. 2013;6(2):93–101.CrossRef Pisa G, Freytag S, Schandry R. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients’ disease-related preferences. Patient. 2013;6(2):93–101.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Street J, Farrell L. Analysis of Social Media. In: Facey K, Hansen H, Single A, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 175–85.CrossRef Street J, Farrell L. Analysis of Social Media. In: Facey K, Hansen H, Single A, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 175–85.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grajales III FJ , Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13.CrossRef Grajales III FJ , Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, Eley N, McKenna K. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2017;20(6):693–708.CrossRef Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, Eley N, McKenna K. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2017;20(6):693–708.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F, Hauber A. Patient preference methods—a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connect. 2007;13(6):4–7. Bridges J, Onukwugha E, Johnson F, Hauber A. Patient preference methods—a patient centered evaluation paradigm. ISPOR Connect. 2007;13(6):4–7.
23.
go back to reference Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57.CrossRef Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Franssen FM, Alter P, Bar N, Benedikter BJ, Iurato S, Maier D, et al. Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we? Int J Chron Obstr Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:1465.CrossRef Franssen FM, Alter P, Bar N, Benedikter BJ, Iurato S, Maier D, et al. Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we? Int J Chron Obstr Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:1465.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sidhaye VK, Nishida K, Martinez FJ. Precision medicine in COPD: where are we and where do we need to go? Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(149):180022.CrossRef Sidhaye VK, Nishida K, Martinez FJ. Precision medicine in COPD: where are we and where do we need to go? Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(149):180022.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Edwards LD, Lomas DA, et al. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res. 2010;11(1):122.CrossRef Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Edwards LD, Lomas DA, et al. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res. 2010;11(1):122.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration: Patient preference information—voluntary submission, review in premarket approval applications, humanitarian device exemption applications, and de novo requests, and inclusion in decision summaries and device labeling. Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff and Other Stakeholders In: CDRH, editor. Silver Spring: Office of Communication, outreach and Development; 2016. US Food and Drug Administration: Patient preference information—voluntary submission, review in premarket approval applications, humanitarian device exemption applications, and de novo requests, and inclusion in decision summaries and device labeling. Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff and Other Stakeholders In: CDRH, editor. Silver Spring: Office of Communication, outreach and Development; 2016.
Metadata
Title
Gathering Structured Patient Insight to Drive the PRO Strategy in COPD: Patient-Centric Drug Development from Theory to Practice
Authors
Francesco Patalano
Florian S. Gutzwiller
Bhavik Shah
Chitresh Kumari
Nigel S. Cook
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01134-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Advances in Therapy 1/2020 Go to the issue