Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ views in South Wales

Authors: Fiona Wood, Hayley Prout, Antony Bayer, Donna Duncan, Jacqueline Nuttall, Kerenza Hood, Christopher C Butler, the PAAD study team

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Care home residents, especially those lacking capacity to provide consent for themselves, are frequently excluded from research, thus limiting generalisability of study findings. We set out to explore stakeholders’ views about the ethical and practical challenges associated with recruiting care home residents into research studies.

Methods

Qualitative individual interviews with care home residents (n = 14), their relatives (n = 14), and general practitioners (GPs) (n = 10), and focus groups (n = 2) with care home staff. Interviews focused on the issues of older adults consenting to research in care homes, including advanced consent, in general and through reference to a particular study on the use of probiotics to prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhoea. Data were analysed using a thematic approach incorporating themes that had been identified in advance, and themes derived from the data. Researchers discussed evidence for themes, and reached consensus on the final themes.

Results

Respondents were generally accepting of low risk observational studies and slightly less accepting of low risk randomised trials of medicinal products. Although respondents identified some practical barriers to informed consent, consenting arrangements were considered workable. Residents and relatives varied in the amount of detail they wanted included in information sheets and consent discussions, but were generally satisfied that an advanced consent model was acceptable and appropriate. Opinions differed about what should happen should residents lose capacity during a research study.

Conclusions

Research staff should be mindful of research guidance and ensure that they have obtained an appropriate level of informed consent without overwhelming the participant with unnecessary detail. For research involving medicinal products, research staff should also be more explicit when recruiting that consent is still valid should an older person lose capacity during a trial provided the individual did not previously state a wish to be withdrawn if they lose capacity, and provided they do not indicate objection or resistance after loss of capacity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Watts G: Why the exclusion of older people from clinical research must stop. Br Med J. 2012, 344: e3445-10.1136/bmj.e3445.CrossRef Watts G: Why the exclusion of older people from clinical research must stop. Br Med J. 2012, 344: e3445-10.1136/bmj.e3445.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bayer A, Tadd W: Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study. Br Med J. 2000, 321 (7267): 992-993. 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.992.CrossRef Bayer A, Tadd W: Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval: descriptive study. Br Med J. 2000, 321 (7267): 992-993. 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.992.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee A: Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports. Br Med J. 1997, 315 (7115): 1059-10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1059.CrossRef Bugeja G, Kumar A, Banerjee A: Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports. Br Med J. 1997, 315 (7115): 1059-10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1059.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McNeely E, Clements S: Recruitment and retention of the older adult into research studies. J Neurosci Nurs. 1994, 26 (1): 57-61. 10.1097/01376517-199402000-00011.CrossRefPubMed McNeely E, Clements S: Recruitment and retention of the older adult into research studies. J Neurosci Nurs. 1994, 26 (1): 57-61. 10.1097/01376517-199402000-00011.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harris R, Dyson E: Recruitment of frail older people to research: lessons learnt through experience. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35 (5): 643-651.CrossRef Harris R, Dyson E: Recruitment of frail older people to research: lessons learnt through experience. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 35 (5): 643-651.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hancock K, Chenoweth L, Chang E: Challenges in conducting research with acutely ill hospitalized older patients. Nurs Health Sci. 2003, 4: 253-259.CrossRef Hancock K, Chenoweth L, Chang E: Challenges in conducting research with acutely ill hospitalized older patients. Nurs Health Sci. 2003, 4: 253-259.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maas M, Kelley L, Park M, Specht J: Issues in conducting research in nursing homes. West J Nurs Res. 2002, 4: 373-389.CrossRef Maas M, Kelley L, Park M, Specht J: Issues in conducting research in nursing homes. West J Nurs Res. 2002, 4: 373-389.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bayer A, Fish M: The doctor’s duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials. Drugs Ageing. 2003, 20 (15): 1087-1097. 10.2165/00002512-200320150-00002.CrossRef Bayer A, Fish M: The doctor’s duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials. Drugs Ageing. 2003, 20 (15): 1087-1097. 10.2165/00002512-200320150-00002.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zimmer A, Calkins E, Hadley E, Ostfeld A, Kaye J, Kaye D: Conducting clinical research in geriatric populations. Ann Intern Med. 1985, 103 (2): 276-283. 10.7326/0003-4819-103-2-276.CrossRefPubMed Zimmer A, Calkins E, Hadley E, Ostfeld A, Kaye J, Kaye D: Conducting clinical research in geriatric populations. Ann Intern Med. 1985, 103 (2): 276-283. 10.7326/0003-4819-103-2-276.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Warren J, Sobal J, Tenney J, Hoopes J, Damron D, Levenson S, DeForge B, Muncie HJ: Informed consent by proxy. N Engl J Med. 1986, 315: 1124-1128. 10.1056/NEJM198610303151804.CrossRefPubMed Warren J, Sobal J, Tenney J, Hoopes J, Damron D, Levenson S, DeForge B, Muncie HJ: Informed consent by proxy. N Engl J Med. 1986, 315: 1124-1128. 10.1056/NEJM198610303151804.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gueldner S, Hanner M: Methodological uses related to gerontological nursing research. Nurs Res. 1989, 38 (3): 183-185.CrossRefPubMed Gueldner S, Hanner M: Methodological uses related to gerontological nursing research. Nurs Res. 1989, 38 (3): 183-185.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Vogt T, Ireland C, Black D, Camel G, Hughes G: Recruitment of elderly volunteers for a multicenter clinical TrialThe SHEP pilot study. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7 (2): 118-133. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90028-0.CrossRefPubMed Vogt T, Ireland C, Black D, Camel G, Hughes G: Recruitment of elderly volunteers for a multicenter clinical TrialThe SHEP pilot study. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7 (2): 118-133. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90028-0.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hancock K, Chenoweth L, Chang E: Challenges in conducting research with acutely ill hospitalized older patients. Nurs Health Sci. 2003, 5: 252-259.CrossRef Hancock K, Chenoweth L, Chang E: Challenges in conducting research with acutely ill hospitalized older patients. Nurs Health Sci. 2003, 5: 252-259.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ridda I, Lindley R, MacIntyre R: The challenges of clinical trials in the exclusion zone: the case of the frail elderly. Australas J Ageing. 2008, 27 (2): 61-66. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00288.x.CrossRefPubMed Ridda I, Lindley R, MacIntyre R: The challenges of clinical trials in the exclusion zone: the case of the frail elderly. Australas J Ageing. 2008, 27 (2): 61-66. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00288.x.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Government Statistical Service: Community Care Statistics 2005–06. 2006, London: The Information Centre, Adult Social Care Statistics Government Statistical Service: Community Care Statistics 2005–06. 2006, London: The Information Centre, Adult Social Care Statistics
17.
go back to reference The Royal College of Physicians: The Royal College of Nursing, British Geriatrics Society: The health and care of older people in care homes: a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach: a report of a joint working party. 2000, London: Royal College of Physicians The Royal College of Physicians: The Royal College of Nursing, British Geriatrics Society: The health and care of older people in care homes: a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach: a report of a joint working party. 2000, London: Royal College of Physicians
18.
go back to reference NHS National Institute for Health Research: ENRICH (Enabling Research in Care Homes): a toolkit for care home research. 2011, London: Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN); NHS National Institute for Health Research NHS National Institute for Health Research: ENRICH (Enabling Research in Care Homes): a toolkit for care home research. 2011, London: Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN); NHS National Institute for Health Research
19.
go back to reference Mental Capacity Act (c.9). 2005, London: HMSO Mental Capacity Act (c.9). 2005, London: HMSO
21.
go back to reference Rees E, Hardy J: Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent. Br Med J. 2003, 327 (198): Rees E, Hardy J: Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent. Br Med J. 2003, 327 (198):
22.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Clinical Governance Advice No 6a. In Obtaining Valid Consent to Participate in Research while in Labour. 2010, London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Clinical Governance Advice No 6a. In Obtaining Valid Consent to Participate in Research while in Labour. 2010, London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
23.
go back to reference Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Br Med J. 2002, 325: 766-770. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766.CrossRef Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Br Med J. 2002, 325: 766-770. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Featherstone K, Donavon J: Random allocation or allocation at random? patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 1998, 317: 1177-1180. 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1177.CrossRef Featherstone K, Donavon J: Random allocation or allocation at random? patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 1998, 317: 1177-1180. 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1177.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Moynihan C, Lewis R, Hall E, Jones E, Birtle A, Huddart R: The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE,CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2012, 13 (228): Moynihan C, Lewis R, Hall E, Jones E, Birtle A, Huddart R: The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE,CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2012, 13 (228):
27.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2004, London: Sage Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. 2004, London: Sage
28.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo Qualitative data analysis software. Doncaster, Australia QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo Qualitative data analysis software. Doncaster, Australia
29.
go back to reference Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Jackson C, Tobin M, Kivits J, Burton P, Samini M: Beyond “misunderstanding”: written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Soc Sci Med. 2007, 65 (11): 2212-2222. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.010.CrossRefPubMed Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Jackson C, Tobin M, Kivits J, Burton P, Samini M: Beyond “misunderstanding”: written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Soc Sci Med. 2007, 65 (11): 2212-2222. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.010.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jefford M, Moore R: Improvement of informed consent and the quality of the consent document. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9 (5): 485-493. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1.CrossRefPubMed Jefford M, Moore R: Improvement of informed consent and the quality of the consent document. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9 (5): 485-493. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Young J, Inouye S: Delirium in older people. Br Med J. 2007, 334: 842-846. 10.1136/bmj.39169.706574.AD.CrossRef Young J, Inouye S: Delirium in older people. Br Med J. 2007, 334: 842-846. 10.1136/bmj.39169.706574.AD.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mental Capacity Act: Loss of Capacity during Research Project (England) Regulations 2007 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Loss of Capacity during Research Project) (Wales) Regulations 2007. 2005 Mental Capacity Act: Loss of Capacity during Research Project (England) Regulations 2007 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Loss of Capacity during Research Project) (Wales) Regulations 2007. 2005
Metadata
Title
Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ views in South Wales
Authors
Fiona Wood
Hayley Prout
Antony Bayer
Donna Duncan
Jacqueline Nuttall
Kerenza Hood
Christopher C Butler
the PAAD study team
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-247

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Trials 1/2013 Go to the issue