Top

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

Published in:

Open Access 16-03-2023 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Validity of postmortem computed tomography for use in forensic odontology identification casework

Authors: Sharon Maley, Denice Higgins

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Forensic Odontology (FO) identification compares antemortem (AM) and postmortem (PM) dental datasets and is widely accepted as a primary identifier. Traditionally, a PM dental examination is undertaken in the same manner as a dental examination conducted for a living patient. Recently, the increased forensic application of computed tomography (CT) offers an alternative source of PM data. While charting from PMCT is widely accepted as less accurate, the impact on reconciliation is unknown. This study aims to determine if reconciliation outcome differs when PM dental data is collected from PMCT, compared with conventional PM examination. PMCT data was reviewed for 21 cases previously completed using conventional PM dental examination. Operators blinded to original identification outcomes charted from CT images before comparing to AM data to form an opinion regarding identity. Opinions formed were compared with original identification outcomes. Differences in PM dental charting between the two methods and the evidentiary value of AM and PM datasets were assessed to determine driving factors of differences in identification outcome. Compared to conventional PM dental examination, PMCT examination resulted in similar or less certain identification outcomes. Discrepancies in outcome were driven by the quality of AM and PM datasets rather than inaccuracies in charting from PMCT. Based on the results of this study, both conventional and PMCT methods of PM dental examination can reach similar identification outcomes. However, operators remained more certain in establishing identity when conducting conventional PM dental examinations especially when AM data was lacking.

Taylor J, Kieser JA. Forensic odontology: principles and practice. Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell. 2016.

Blau S, Rowbotham SK. Not so simple: Understanding the complexities of establishing identity for cases of unidentified human remains in an Australian medico-legal system. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;330:111107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111107.

Loomis PW, Reid JS, Tabor MP, Weems RA. Chapter 3 - dental identification & radiographic pitfalls. In: David TJ, Lewis JM, editors. Forensic Odontology. Academic Press; 2018. p. 25–46.CrossRef

INTERPOL disaster victim identification guide. 2018. https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/589/file/18Y1344%20E%20DVI_Guide.pdf

Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG. Brogdon’s forensic radiology. Baton Rouge, United states: Taylor & Francis Group. 2010.

Adolphi N. Evaluation of the routine use of CT scanning to supplant or supplement autopsy in a high-volume medical examiner’s office. National Institute of Justice, Office of Investigative and Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science R&D Program. 2022.

Jensen ND, Arge S, Hansen NF, Lynnerup N. Post-mortem computed tomography as part of dental identification - a proposed guideline. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019;15(4):574–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-019-00145-y.CrossRefPubMed

O’Donnell C, Rotman A, Collett S, Woodford N. Current status of routine post-mortem CT in Melbourne. Australia Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2007;3(3):226–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-007-9006-8.CrossRefPubMed

Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community NAoS. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Nat Acad Sci. 2009. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf

10.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology EOotP. Forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. Executive Office of the President. 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf

11.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. US: Supreme Court. 1993;579. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/case.pdf

12.

Leow S, Higgins D. Can dental charting from a post-mortem computed tomographical scan produce a confident forensic identification without traditional physical and radiographic examination? Aus J Foren Sci. 2020:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1823477.

13.

Ruder TD, Thali YA, Rashid SNA, Mund MT, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, et al. Validation of post mortem dental CT for disaster victim identification. J Foren Radiol Imag. 2016;5:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2016.01.006.CrossRef

14.

Franco A, Thevissen P, Coudyzer W, Develter W, Van de Voorde W, Oyen R, et al. Feasibility and validation of virtual autopsy for dental identification using the Interpol dental codes. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(4):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.021.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Jensen ND, Ulloa PC, Arge S, Bindslev DA, Lynnerup N. Odontological identification dental charts based upon postmortem computed tomography compared to dental charts based upon postmortem clinical examinations. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020;16(2):272–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00217-4.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kirchhoff S, Fischer F, Lindemaier G, Herzog P, Kirchhoff C, Becker C, et al. Is post-mortem CT of the dentition adequate for correct forensic identification?: comparison of dental computed tomograpy and visual dental record. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(6):471–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0274-y.CrossRefPubMed

17.

ISO 3950:2016 Dentistry - designation system for teeth and areas of the oral cavity. 4 ed 2016.

18.

Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 1980;6(2):107–18.

19.

Kvam PD, Pleskac TJ. Strength and weight: the determinants of choice and confidence. Cognition. 2016;152:170–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.008.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental evidence in forensic identification - an overview, methodology and present status. Open Dent J. 2015;9:250–6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Diac MM, Iov T, Knieling A, Damian SI, Tabian D, Bulgaru Iliescu D. Dental identification in forensic anthropology. A literature review. Int J Med Dentis. 2020;24(3):464–71.

22.

Stow L, James H, Richards L. Australian oral health case notes: assessment of forensic relevance and adherence to recording guidelines. Aust Dent J. 2016;61(2):236–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12350.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Stow L, Higgins D. The importance of increasing the forensic relevance of oral health records for improved human identification outcomes. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2017;51(1):49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1310923.CrossRef

24.

Chiam SL, Louise J, Higgins D. “Identified”, “probable”, “possible” or “exclude”: the influence of task-irrelevant information on forensic odontology identification opinion. Sci Justice. 2022;62(4):461–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Page M, Lain R, Kemp R, Taylor J. Validation studies in forensic odontology - Part 1: Accuracy of radiographic matching. Sci Justice. 2018;58(3):185–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.11.001.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Chiam SL, Higgins D, Colyvas K, Page M, Taylor J. Interpretation, confidence and application of the standardised terms: identified, probable, possible, exclude and insufficient in forensic odontology identification. Sci Justice. 2021;61(4):426–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.02.007.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Validity of postmortem computed tomography for use in forensic odontology identification casework
Authors: Sharon Maley
Denice Higgins
Publication date: 16-03-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00591-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Validity of postmortem computed tomography for use in forensic odontology identification casework

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Seasonal diversity and dynamics of entomofauna associated with the decomposition of pig (Sus scrofa domesticus L.) carcasses in a Peri-urban area of Central Burkina Faso, West Africa

Starch treatment improves the salivary proteome for subject identification purposes

Conventional HE staining combined with two special staining methods to identify antemortem stab wound in case with highly decomposed mutilated corpses

Fatal cardiac air embolism after CT-guided percutaneous needle lung biopsy: medical complication or medical malpractice?

Cheiloscopy in sex estimation: a systematic review

Authors reply to “Commentary on - fatal cardiac air embolism after CT-guided percutaneous needle lung biopsy: medical complication or medical malpractice? -”