Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Computed Tomography | Computed Tomography

Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010

Authors: Christoph Aberle, Nick Ryckx, Reto Treier, Sebastian Schindera

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To update the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for adult CT in Switzerland using dose management software and to compare them to the previous Swiss DRLs from 2010.

Methods

CT dose data from 14 radiological institutes with a total of 50 CT scanners were collected with locally installed dose management software between 2014 and 2017. Data were assigned to 15 defined master protocols. Data cleaning steps were developed and adjusted individually for each participating institute and protocol. The DRLs for each master protocol were calculated as the 75th percentile of the distribution of the median volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) values per CT scanner.

Results

In total, 220,269 CT exams were available after data cleaning. Updated DRLs showed a clear trend towards lower doses compared with previous DRLs. The average relative change in the DRLs for CTDIvol was − 30% (0 to − 47%) and − 22% for DLP (+ 20 to − 40%). The largest relative decrease in the DRL for DLP was observed for the cervical spine protocol (− 40%), the two chest protocols (chest, − 37%; and exclusion of pulmonary embolism, − 33%), and the two neck protocols (neck, − 32%; and carotid angiography, − 28%). The DRLs for other protocols, for example the head and the abdomen-pelvis protocol, showed smaller relative changes (− 11% and − 17%).

Conclusions

The updated national DRLs are substantially lower than the previous values from 2010, demonstrating technological progress and the efforts of the radiological community to lower CT radiation exposure.

Key Points

• Dose management software allows the establishment of DRLs based on big data.
• Updated Swiss DRLs for adult CT are substantially lower compared with those from 2010.
• Swiss DRLs are low compared with other national DRLs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Aroua A, Burnand B, Decka I, Vader JP, Valley JF (2002) Nation-wide survey on radiation doses in diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland in 1998. Health Phys 83:46–55CrossRef
2.
Aroua A, Trueb P, Vader JP, Valley JF, Verdun FR (2007) Exposure of the Swiss population by radiodiagnostics: 2003 review. Health Phys 92:442–448CrossRef
3.
Samara ET, Aroua A, Bochud FO et al (2012) Exposure of the Swiss population by medical X-rays: 2008 review. Health Phys 102:263–270CrossRef
4.
Le Coultre R, Bize J, Champendal M et al (2016) Exposure of the Swiss population by radiodiagnostics: 2013 review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 169:221–224CrossRef
5.
6.
Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ et al (2017) ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46(1):1–144
7.
(1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 26(2):1–31
8.
Järvinen H, Vassileva J, Samei E, Wallace A, Vano E, Rehani M (2017) Patient dose monitoring and the use of diagnostic reference levels for the optimization of protection in medical imaging: current status and challenges worldwide. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 4:031214
9.
10.
11.
12.
Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun FR, Samara E, Stuessi A, Trueb PR (2010) Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 142:244–254CrossRef
13.
Heilmaier C, Treier R, Merkle EM, Alkadhi H, Weishaupt D, Schindera S (2018) National survey on dose data analysis in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 28:5044–5050CrossRef
14.
15.
16.
Roch P, Célier D, Dessaud C, Etard C (2018) Using diagnostic reference levels to evaluate the improvement of patient dose optimisation and the influence of recent technologies in radiography and computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 98:68–74CrossRef
17.
Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) U.S. Diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284:120–133CrossRef
18.
19.
Pansini M, Morsbach F, Schubert T et al (2016) Feasibility of dose optimization in a second-generation dual-source CT scanner for a manufacturer-recommended urolithiasis protocol for imaging renal stones. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:348–354CrossRef
20.
Tack D, Widelec J, De Maertelaer V, Bailly JM, Delcour C, Gevenois PA (2003) Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:939–944CrossRef
21.
22.
23.
24.
National Radiological Protection Board (1999) Guidelines on patient dose to promote the optimisation of protection for diagnostic medical exposures. Documents of the NRPB 10(1)
25.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2012) Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRP Report No 172
26.
27.
28.
Smith-Bindman R, Wang Y, Chu P et al (2019) International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study. BMJ 364:k4931CrossRef
29.
30.
Vinci L, Krieger JP, Braun J et al (2019) Clustering of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors among adults with excess weight in a multilingual country. Nutrition 62:177–185CrossRef
31.
32.
Boos J, Lanzman RS, Heusch P et al (2016) Does body mass index outperform body weight as a surrogate parameter in the calculation of size-specific dose estimates in adult body CT? Br J Radiol 89:20150734CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010
Authors
Christoph Aberle
Nick Ryckx
Reto Treier
Sebastian Schindera
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06485-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

European Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor: how to document adverse reactions induced by gadolinium based contrast agents? A plea for type A and type B reactions

Neuro

Quantitative brain lesion distribution may distinguish MOG-ab and AQP4-ab neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Chest

New severity assessment in cystic fibrosis: signal intensity and lung volume compared to LCI and FEV1: preliminary results

Gastrointestinal

Multiparametric MRI and 18F-FDG PET features for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors from benign gastric subepithelial lesions

Musculoskeletal

The prevalence of Baker cyst in relation to the arrangement pattern between the medial head of gastrocnemius tendon and the semimembranosus tendon

Chest

Deep learning-based detection system for multiclass lesions on chest radiographs: comparison with observer readings