Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Computed Tomography | Pancreas

Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital

Authors: Pankaj Gupta, Rishabh Jain, Suzanne Koshi, Ajay Gulati, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, Saroj K. Sinha, Usha Dutta, Manavjit Singh Sandhu, Rakesh Kochhar

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a limited data on the radiation dose from computed tomography (CT) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The present study evaluated the radiation dose from CT scans in patients with AP.

Material

A retrospective review of CT reports of patients with AP was conducted. The type of CT scan (non-contrast vs. single-phase vs. biphasic CT) was recorded. The mean number of CT scans and cumulative radiation dose was calculated. The indications and abnormalities on biphasic CT scans were recorded. The radiation doses between different types of the scan were compared.

Results

495 CT studies in 351 patients were evaluated. In patients (n = 78, 22.2%) undergoing multiple CT scans, mean number of CT scans per patient and mean radiation dose were 2.64 ± 1.18 (range 2–9) and 24 ± 15 mSv (range 8.3–79.8 mSv), respectively. The mean radiation dose was significantly greater in patients with modified CT severity index ≥ 8 (n = 63) [25.08 mSv vs. 18.96 mSv, (P = 0.048)]. 61 (12.32%) biphasic scans were performed. A definite indication for a biphasic CT scan was identified in 20 (32.7%) patients. Arterial abnormalities were detected in 6 (9.8%) patients undergoing CT for defined indication. Mean radiation dose in this group was 13.26 ± 7.64 mSv (range 3.42–38.27 mSv) which was significantly greater than the single venous phase scan (7.96 ± 3.48 mSv, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

There is a potential for substantial radiation exposure from CT scans to patients with AP. Patients with severe AP and those undergoing biphasic scans have significantly higher radiation exposure. Hence, routine arterial phase acquisition should be avoided.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the Epidemiology of the First Attack of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Pancreas. 2006;33(4):323–30.CrossRef Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. Trends in the Epidemiology of the First Attack of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Pancreas. 2006;33(4):323–30.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goldacre MJ, Roberts SE. Hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an English population, 1963-98: database study of incidence and mortality. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1466–9.CrossRef Goldacre MJ, Roberts SE. Hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an English population, 1963-98: database study of incidence and mortality. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1466–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Spanier BM, Bruno MJ, Dijkgraaf MG. Incidence and mortality of acute and chronic pancreatitis in the Netherlands: A nationwide record-linked cohort study for the years 1995-2005. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(20):3018–26.CrossRef Spanier BM, Bruno MJ, Dijkgraaf MG. Incidence and mortality of acute and chronic pancreatitis in the Netherlands: A nationwide record-linked cohort study for the years 1995-2005. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(20):3018–26.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Floyd A, Pedersen L, Nielsen GL, Thorladcius-Ussing O, Sorensen HT. Secular trends in incidence and 30-day case fatality of acute pancreatitis in North Jutland County, Denmark: a register-based study from 1981-2000. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(12):1461–5.CrossRef Floyd A, Pedersen L, Nielsen GL, Thorladcius-Ussing O, Sorensen HT. Secular trends in incidence and 30-day case fatality of acute pancreatitis in North Jutland County, Denmark: a register-based study from 1981-2000. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(12):1461–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lindkvist B, Appelros S, Manjer J, Borgström A. Trends in incidence of acute pancreatitis in a Swedish population: is there really an increase? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(9):831-7.CrossRef Lindkvist B, Appelros S, Manjer J, Borgström A. Trends in incidence of acute pancreatitis in a Swedish population: is there really an increase? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(9):831-7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fagenholz PJ, Fernández-del Castillo C, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA Jr. National study of United States emergency department visits for acute pancreatitis, 1993-2003. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7:1.CrossRef Fagenholz PJ, Fernández-del Castillo C, Harris NS, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA Jr. National study of United States emergency department visits for acute pancreatitis, 1993-2003. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7:1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.CrossRef Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bansal A, Gupta P, Singh H, et al. Gastrointestinal complications in acute and chronic pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2019;3(6):450–5.CrossRef Bansal A, Gupta P, Singh H, et al. Gastrointestinal complications in acute and chronic pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2019;3(6):450–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kumar P, Gupta P, Rana S. Thoracic complications of pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2018;3(1):71–9.CrossRef Kumar P, Gupta P, Rana S. Thoracic complications of pancreatitis. JGH Open. 2018;3(1):71–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362–78.CrossRef Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362–78.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):887-92.CrossRef Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):887-92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dixon AK, Dendy P. Spiral CT: how much does radiation dose matter? Lancet Lond Engl. 1998;352(9134):1082–3.CrossRef Dixon AK, Dendy P. Spiral CT: how much does radiation dose matter? Lancet Lond Engl. 1998;352(9134):1082–3.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232(3):735–8.CrossRef Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology. 2004;232(3):735–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Journy NMY, Lee C, Harbron RW, McHugh K, Pearce MS, Berrington de González A. Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990–2020. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(1):109–16. Journy NMY, Lee C, Harbron RW, McHugh K, Pearce MS, Berrington de González A. Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990–2020. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(1):109–16.
15.
go back to reference Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251(1):175-84.CrossRef Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251(1):175-84.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Frush DP. Review of radiation issues for computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004;25:17–24.CrossRef Frush DP. Review of radiation issues for computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004;25:17–24.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, Shankar S, Zou KH, Kalantari BN, et al. A Modified CT Severity Index for Evaluating Acute Pancreatitis: Improved Correlation with Patient Outcome. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(5):1261–5.CrossRef Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, Shankar S, Zou KH, Kalantari BN, et al. A Modified CT Severity Index for Evaluating Acute Pancreatitis: Improved Correlation with Patient Outcome. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(5):1261–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gupta P, Rana P, Bellam BL, et al. Site and size of extrapancreatic necrosis are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2019 Nov 20. pii: S1424-3903(19)30791-4. Gupta P, Rana P, Bellam BL, et al. Site and size of extrapancreatic necrosis are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2019 Nov 20. pii: S1424-3903(19)30791-4.
19.
go back to reference Morgan DE, Ragheb CM, Lockhart ME, Cary B, Fineberg NS, Berland LL. Acute pancreatitis: computed tomography utilization and radiation exposure are related to severity but not patient age. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(3):303-8CrossRef Morgan DE, Ragheb CM, Lockhart ME, Cary B, Fineberg NS, Berland LL. Acute pancreatitis: computed tomography utilization and radiation exposure are related to severity but not patient age. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(3):303-8CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ball CG, Correa-Gallego C, Howard TJ, et al. Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much? J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(10):1529-35.CrossRef Ball CG, Correa-Gallego C, Howard TJ, et al. Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis: how much is too much? J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(10):1529-35.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Singhal M, Gupta P, Singh S, Khandelwal N. Computed tomography coronary angiography is the way forward for evaluation of children with Kawasaki disease. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017;2017(3):e201728.PubMedPubMedCentral Singhal M, Gupta P, Singh S, Khandelwal N. Computed tomography coronary angiography is the way forward for evaluation of children with Kawasaki disease. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017;2017(3):e201728.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kothari S, Kalinowski M, Kobeszko M, Almouradi T. Computed tomography scan imaging in diagnosing acute uncomplicated pancreatitis: Usefulness vs cost. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(9):1080-1087.CrossRef Kothari S, Kalinowski M, Kobeszko M, Almouradi T. Computed tomography scan imaging in diagnosing acute uncomplicated pancreatitis: Usefulness vs cost. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(9):1080-1087.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kwon Y, Park HS, Kim YJ, Jung SI, Jeon HJ. Multidetector row computed tomography of acute pancreatitis: Utility of single portal phase CT scan in short-term follow up. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(8):1728-34.CrossRef Kwon Y, Park HS, Kim YJ, Jung SI, Jeon HJ. Multidetector row computed tomography of acute pancreatitis: Utility of single portal phase CT scan in short-term follow up. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(8):1728-34.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radiation dose from computed tomography in patients with acute pancreatitis: an audit from a tertiary care referral hospital
Authors
Pankaj Gupta
Rishabh Jain
Suzanne Koshi
Ajay Gulati
Jayanta Samanta
Harshal Mandavdhare
Vishal Sharma
Saroj K. Sinha
Usha Dutta
Manavjit Singh Sandhu
Rakesh Kochhar
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02408-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Abdominal Radiology 5/2020 Go to the issue

Special Section: Pancreatitis

Optimum imaging of chronic pancreatitis

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.