Published in:
01-12-2020 | Computed Tomography | Original Article
Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial
Authors:
Lauren H. Goldman, MD, Rikah Lerer, MD, Cyrus Shabrang, MD, Mark I. Travin, MD, Jeffrey M. Levsky, MD, PhD
Published in:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
|
Issue 6/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship.
Methods
Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer’s exact tests.
Results
386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20% (39) vs. 12% (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38% (75) vs. 18% (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14% (27) vs. 7% (13) P = 0.029].
Conclusions
Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.