Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Computed Tomography | Computed Tomography

A deep residual learning network for predicting lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodule on CT images

Authors: Jing Gong, Jiyu Liu, Wen Hao, Shengdong Nie, Bin Zheng, Shengping Wang, Weijun Peng

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To develop a deep learning–based artificial intelligence (AI) scheme for predicting the likelihood of the ground-glass nodule (GGN) detected on CT images being invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) and also compare the accuracy of this AI scheme with that of two radiologists.

Methods

First, we retrospectively collected 828 histopathologically confirmed GGNs of 644 patients from two centers. Among them, 209 GGNs are confirmed IA and 619 are non-IA, including 409 adenocarcinomas in situ and 210 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas. Second, we applied a series of pre-preprocessing techniques, such as image resampling, rescaling and cropping, and data augmentation, to process original CT images and generate new training and testing images. Third, we built an AI scheme based on a deep convolutional neural network by using a residual learning architecture and batch normalization technique. Finally, we conducted an observer study and compared the prediction performance of the AI scheme with that of two radiologists using an independent dataset with 102 GGNs.

Results

The new AI scheme yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.92 ± 0.03 in classifying between IA and non-IA GGNs, which is equivalent to the senior radiologist’s performance (AUC 0.92 ± 0.03) and higher than the score of the junior radiologist (AUC 0.90 ± 0.03). The Kappa value of two sets of subjective prediction scores generated by two radiologists is 0.6.

Conclusions

The study result demonstrates using an AI scheme to improve the performance in predicting IA, which can help improve the development of a more effective personalized cancer treatment paradigm.

Key Points

• The feasibility of using a deep learning method to predict the likelihood of the ground-glass nodule being invasive adenocarcinoma.
• Residual learning–based CNN model improves the performance in classifying between IA and non-IA nodules.
• Artificial intelligence (AI) scheme yields higher performance than radiologists in predicting invasive adenocarcinoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zappa C, Mousa SA (2016) Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res 5:288–300CrossRef Zappa C, Mousa SA (2016) Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res 5:288–300CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Han L, Zhang P, Wang Y et al (2018) CT quantitative parameters to predict the invasiveness of lung pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). Clin Radiol 73:504.e1–504.e7CrossRef Han L, Zhang P, Wang Y et al (2018) CT quantitative parameters to predict the invasiveness of lung pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). Clin Radiol 73:504.e1–504.e7CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Tang J, Xu J, Cheng J, Wu H (2017) Analysis of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodule in enhanced dual energy CTimaging for predicting invasive adenocarcinoma: comparing with conventional thin-section CT imaging. J Thorac Dis 9:4967–4978CrossRef Zhang Y, Tang J, Xu J, Cheng J, Wu H (2017) Analysis of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodule in enhanced dual energy CTimaging for predicting invasive adenocarcinoma: comparing with conventional thin-section CT imaging. J Thorac Dis 9:4967–4978CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hu H, Wang Q, Tang H, Xiong L, Lin Q (2016) Multi-slice computed tomography characteristics of solitary pulmonary groundglass nodules: differences between malignant and benign. Thorac Cancer 7:80–87CrossRef Hu H, Wang Q, Tang H, Xiong L, Lin Q (2016) Multi-slice computed tomography characteristics of solitary pulmonary groundglass nodules: differences between malignant and benign. Thorac Cancer 7:80–87CrossRef
5.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284:228–243CrossRef MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284:228–243CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee HY, La Choi Y, Lee KS et al (2014) Pure ground-glass opacity neoplastic lung nodules: histopathology, imaging, management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:224–233CrossRef Lee HY, La Choi Y, Lee KS et al (2014) Pure ground-glass opacity neoplastic lung nodules: histopathology, imaging, management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:224–233CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pedersen JH, Saghir Z, Wille MMW et al (2016) Ground-glass opacity lung nodules in the era of lung cancer CT screening: radiology, pathology, and clinical management. Oncology (Willston Park) 30:266–274 Pedersen JH, Saghir Z, Wille MMW et al (2016) Ground-glass opacity lung nodules in the era of lung cancer CT screening: radiology, pathology, and clinical management. Oncology (Willston Park) 30:266–274
8.
go back to reference Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285CrossRef Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fan L, Fang MJ, Li ZB et al (2019) Radiomics signature: a biomarker for the preoperative discrimination of lung invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as a ground-glass nodule. Eur Radiol 29:889–897CrossRef Fan L, Fang MJ, Li ZB et al (2019) Radiomics signature: a biomarker for the preoperative discrimination of lung invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as a ground-glass nodule. Eur Radiol 29:889–897CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li M, Wu N, Zhang L et al (2018) Solid component proportion is an important predictor of tumor invasiveness in clinical stage T1N0M0 (cT1N0M0) lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Imaging 18:18CrossRef Li M, Wu N, Zhang L et al (2018) Solid component proportion is an important predictor of tumor invasiveness in clinical stage T1N0M0 (cT1N0M0) lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Imaging 18:18CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang S, Wang R, Zhang S et al (2018) 3D convolutional neural network for differentiating pre-invasive lesions from invasive adenocarcinomas appearing as ground- glass nodules with diameters ≤3 cm using HRCT. Quant Imaging Med Surg 8:491–499CrossRef Wang S, Wang R, Zhang S et al (2018) 3D convolutional neural network for differentiating pre-invasive lesions from invasive adenocarcinomas appearing as ground- glass nodules with diameters ≤3 cm using HRCT. Quant Imaging Med Surg 8:491–499CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee GD, Park CH, Park HS et al (2019) Lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness risk in pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules smaller than 2 cm. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67:321–328CrossRef Lee GD, Park CH, Park HS et al (2019) Lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness risk in pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules smaller than 2 cm. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67:321–328CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gong J, Liu J-Y, Sun X-W et al (2018) Computer-aided diagnosis of lung cancer: the effect of training data sets on classification accuracy of lung nodules. Phys Med Biol 63:035036CrossRef Gong J, Liu J-Y, Sun X-W et al (2018) Computer-aided diagnosis of lung cancer: the effect of training data sets on classification accuracy of lung nodules. Phys Med Biol 63:035036CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gong J, Liu J, Jiang Y et al (2018) Fusion of quantitative imaging features and serum biomarkers to improve performance of computer-aided diagnosis scheme for lung cancer: A preliminary study. Med Phys 45:5472–5481CrossRef Gong J, Liu J, Jiang Y et al (2018) Fusion of quantitative imaging features and serum biomarkers to improve performance of computer-aided diagnosis scheme for lung cancer: A preliminary study. Med Phys 45:5472–5481CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gao F, Sun Y, Zhang G et al (2019) CTcharacterization of different pathological types of subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodular lesions. Br J Radiol 92:20180204CrossRef Gao F, Sun Y, Zhang G et al (2019) CTcharacterization of different pathological types of subcentimeter pulmonary ground-glass nodular lesions. Br J Radiol 92:20180204CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cohen JG, Goo JM, Yoo R et al (2016) Software performance in segmenting ground-glass and solid components of subsolid nodules in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Eur Radiol 26:4465–4474CrossRef Cohen JG, Goo JM, Yoo R et al (2016) Software performance in segmenting ground-glass and solid components of subsolid nodules in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Eur Radiol 26:4465–4474CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wang XW, Chen WF, He WJ et al (2018) CT features differentiating pre- and minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma appearing as mixed ground-glass nodules: mass is a potential imaging biomarker. Clin Radiol 73:549–554CrossRef Wang XW, Chen WF, He WJ et al (2018) CT features differentiating pre- and minimally invasive from invasive adenocarcinoma appearing as mixed ground-glass nodules: mass is a potential imaging biomarker. Clin Radiol 73:549–554CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhao W, Yang J, Sun Y et al (2018) 3D Deep Learning from CT scans predicts tumor invasiveness of subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 78:6881–6889CrossRef Zhao W, Yang J, Sun Y et al (2018) 3D Deep Learning from CT scans predicts tumor invasiveness of subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 78:6881–6889CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A et al (2018) Liver fibrosis: deep convolutional neural network for staging by using gadoxetic acid–enhanced hepatobiliary phaseMRimages. Radiology 287:146–155CrossRef Yasaka K, Akai H, Kunimatsu A et al (2018) Liver fibrosis: deep convolutional neural network for staging by using gadoxetic acid–enhanced hepatobiliary phaseMRimages. Radiology 287:146–155CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shen D, Wu G, Suk H-I (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248CrossRef Shen D, Wu G, Suk H-I (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248CrossRef
21.
go back to reference He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE 770-778 He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE 770-778
22.
go back to reference Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A et al (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958 Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A et al (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958
24.
go back to reference Metz CE (2006) Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol 3:413–422CrossRef Metz CE (2006) Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol 3:413–422CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Powers DM (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and Fmeasure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J Mach Learn Technol 2:37–63 Powers DM (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and Fmeasure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J Mach Learn Technol 2:37–63
26.
go back to reference Ben-David A (2008) About the relationship between ROC curves and Cohen’s kappa. Eng Appl Artif Intel 21:874–882CrossRef Ben-David A (2008) About the relationship between ROC curves and Cohen’s kappa. Eng Appl Artif Intel 21:874–882CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Son JY, Lee HY, Kim J-H et al (2016) Quantitative CT analysis of pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules for distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma from non-invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma: the added value of using iodine mapping. Eur Radiol 26:43–54CrossRef Son JY, Lee HY, Kim J-H et al (2016) Quantitative CT analysis of pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules for distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma from non-invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma: the added value of using iodine mapping. Eur Radiol 26:43–54CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zhang YP, Heuvelmans MA, Zhang H et al (2018) Changes in quantitative CT image features of ground-glass nodules in differentiating invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma from benign and in situ lesions: histopathological comparisons. Clin Radiol 73:504.e9–504.e16CrossRef Zhang YP, Heuvelmans MA, Zhang H et al (2018) Changes in quantitative CT image features of ground-glass nodules in differentiating invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma from benign and in situ lesions: histopathological comparisons. Clin Radiol 73:504.e9–504.e16CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chae H-D, Park CM, Park SJ et al (2014) Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology 273:285–293CrossRef Chae H-D, Park CM, Park SJ et al (2014) Computerized texture analysis of persistent part-solid ground-glass nodules: differentiation of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Radiology 273:285–293CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A deep residual learning network for predicting lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodule on CT images
Authors
Jing Gong
Jiyu Liu
Wen Hao
Shengdong Nie
Bin Zheng
Shengping Wang
Weijun Peng
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06533-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Radiology 4/2020 Go to the issue