Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases

Authors: Johannes Jongen, Anne Eberstein, Jens-Uwe Bock, Hans-Günter Peleikis, Volker Kahlke

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to analyse the outcomes of all patients requiring a reoperation after an initial circular stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) for prolapsing haemorrhoids.

Methods

Data of all patients undergoing a circular SH from 1998 thru 2007 available in a prospectively collected database were reviewed, and all patients who had reoperations were studied.

Results

During the study period, 1,233 patients (551 females, median age 52 years) underwent a circular SH. Complete follow-up was available in all patients (median follow-up 7 months, range 0.5–100); 127 patients (10.3%) required one or more reoperations. Early reoperations (<30 days) were necessary in 47 patients (3.8%), and 45 (3.6%) were stapler-related complications. Late reoperations (>30 days) were performed in 84 patients (6.8%) and 57 (4.6%) were stapler-related. A learning curve was observed with significant reduction of early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) reoperation rate with time.

Conclusions

Reoperations after SH are necessary in about 10% of the patients. The majority of the reoperations are due to either complications arising from circular SH, recurrent/persistent haemorrhoidal symptoms or other anorectal issues not addressed by the circular SH procedure (3.8% early; 6.8% late). Circular SH appears to be an effective procedure for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease; however, training and learning curve issues should be addressed to minimise treatment failures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28 Koblandin SN, Schalkow JL (1981) Eine neue Methode zur Behandlung von Hämorrhoiden mit Hilfe eines Zirkularstaplers. Wissenschaftliches Archiv des Zelinograder Medizinischen Institutes (Kasachstan) 27–28
2.
go back to reference Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784 Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore 777–784
3.
go back to reference Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech. Coloproctology 11:1–6CrossRef Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech. Coloproctology 11:1–6CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Herold A, Kirsch JJ (2001) Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland. Coloproctology 23:8–16CrossRef Herold A, Kirsch JJ (2001) Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland. Coloproctology 23:8–16CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171CrossRefPubMed Jongen J, Bock JU, Peleikis HP et al (2006) Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:166–171CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMed Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239CrossRefPubMed Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N (2005) Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 19:235–239CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ho KS, Ho YH (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctology 10:193–197CrossRef Ho KS, Ho YH (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctology 10:193–197CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961CrossRefPubMed Huang W, Chin C, Yeh C, Lin P, Wang J (2007) Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:955–961CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int med Res 35:917–921PubMed Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up. J Int med Res 35:917–921PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle Exzision versus Resektion mit dem Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte Studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M (2004) Konventionelle Exzision versus Resektion mit dem Klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte Studie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1611–1617CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed Jayaraman S, Coquhoun PHD, Mathaner RA (2007) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406CrossRefPubMed Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL et al (2002) A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1395–1406CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243CrossRefPubMed Burch J, Epstein D, Baba-Akbari Sari A, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 11:233–243CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344CrossRefPubMed Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapler haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systemic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:335–344CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989CrossRefPubMed Jongen J, Petersen S (2009) Letter to the editor: reviewing reviewers and reanalysing meta-analyses of stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:989CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F (2001) Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferential prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 3:175–178CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:669–674CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1049–1053CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375CrossRefPubMed Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S (2002) Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1367–1375CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P (2002) Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 89:1376–1381CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48:809–815CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35CrossRefPubMed Gravié JF, Lehur PA, Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year follow up. Ann Surg 242:29–35CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1517–1522CrossRefPubMed Kraemer M, Parulava T, Roblick M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H (2005) Prospective, randomized study: proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for hemorrhoidal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1517–1522CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Morson JRT (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Morson JRT (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Lomanto D, Katara AN (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience. Asian J Surg 30:29–33CrossRefPubMed Lomanto D, Katara AN (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience. Asian J Surg 30:29–33CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:93–99CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bona S, Battafarano F, Romario UF, Zago M, Rosati R (2008) Stapled anopexy: postoperative course and functional outcome in 400 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:950–955CrossRefPubMed Bona S, Battafarano F, Romario UF, Zago M, Rosati R (2008) Stapled anopexy: postoperative course and functional outcome in 400 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:950–955CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Oughriss M, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRefPubMed Oughriss M, Faucheron JL (2005) Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:429–433CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctology 10:43–46CrossRef Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidectomy: our experience. Tech Coloproctology 10:43–46CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 51:334–341CrossRefPubMed Raahave D, Jepsen LV, Pedersen IK (2008) Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years. Dis Colon Rectum 51:334–341CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Gerjy R, Nyström PO (2007) Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis 9:754–757CrossRefPubMed Gerjy R, Nyström PO (2007) Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain. Colorectal Dis 9:754–757CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Fondran JC, Porter JA, Slezak FA (2006) Inflammatory polyps: a cause of late bleeding in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1910–1913CrossRefPubMed Fondran JC, Porter JA, Slezak FA (2006) Inflammatory polyps: a cause of late bleeding in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1910–1913CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, Sousa AHS, Correia Ravelo JM et al (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: initial experience of a Latin American group. J Gastrointest Surg 7:809–813CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Sousa AHS, Correia Ravelo JM et al (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: initial experience of a Latin American group. J Gastrointest Surg 7:809–813CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Ebert K-H, Meyer HJ (2002) Die Klammernahtresektion bei Hämorrhoiden-eine Bestandsaufnahme nach zweijähriger Anwendung. Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit der Technik nach Milligan-Morgan. Zentralbl Chir 127:9–14CrossRefPubMed Ebert K-H, Meyer HJ (2002) Die Klammernahtresektion bei Hämorrhoiden-eine Bestandsaufnahme nach zweijähriger Anwendung. Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit der Technik nach Milligan-Morgan. Zentralbl Chir 127:9–14CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Singer MA, Cintrom JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Spitz JS, Abcarian H (2002) Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 45:360–369CrossRefPubMed Singer MA, Cintrom JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Spitz JS, Abcarian H (2002) Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 45:360–369CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P (1999) Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Eine neue Alternative zu den konventionellen Methoden. Zentralbl Chir 124:238–243PubMed Kohlstadt CM, Weber J, Prohm P (1999) Die Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Eine neue Alternative zu den konventionellen Methoden. Zentralbl Chir 124:238–243PubMed
46.
go back to reference Pinheiro Regadas FS, Murad Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience. Tech Coloproctology 9:243–246CrossRef Pinheiro Regadas FS, Murad Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience. Tech Coloproctology 9:243–246CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases
Authors
Johannes Jongen
Anne Eberstein
Jens-Uwe Bock
Hans-Günter Peleikis
Volker Kahlke
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0543-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2010 Go to the issue