Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Original Contributions

Prospective, Randomized Study: Proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for Hemorrhoidal Surgery

Authors: Matthias Kraemer, M.D., Tengis Parulava, M.D., Michael Roblick, M.D., Lothar Duschka, M.D., Heinrich Müller-Lobeck, M.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

It has been shown that for hemorrhoidal surgery both LigaSure™ and stapler cause less pain than diathermy or scissor dissection. This study has attempted to establish which of the less painful alternatives proves best in an unselected series of patients with hemorrhoidal disease.

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomized to undergo stapling hemorrhoidopexy or LigaSure™ hemorrhoidectomy. Parameters investigated were pain (primary parameter), patient satisfaction with treatment, and recovery of personal activity. Other factors investigated were operative result, ease of handling, analgesic requirements, and postoperative course.

RESULTS

Both methods were found to be equivalent in all major aspects analyzed. Postoperative pain scores (P = 0.99), patient satisfaction (P = 1), and self-assessment of activity (P = 0.99) were almost identical in both groups of patients. Significant differences were found in none of the numerous factors investigated.

CONCLUSION

Both methods can be used safely and without major disadvantage for the patient regardless of stage and extent of hemorrhoidal disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brisinda, G, Civello, IM, Maria, G 2000Hemorrhoidectomy: painful choice [letter]Lancet3552253 Brisinda, G, Civello, IM, Maria, G 2000Hemorrhoidectomy: painful choice [letter]Lancet3552253
2.
go back to reference Engel, AF, Eijsbouts, QA 2000Haemorrhoidectomy: painful choice [letter]Lancet35522534 Engel, AF, Eijsbouts, QA 2000Haemorrhoidectomy: painful choice [letter]Lancet35522534
3.
go back to reference MacRae, HM, McLeod, RS 1995Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysisDis Colon Rectum3868794PubMed MacRae, HM, McLeod, RS 1995Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysisDis Colon Rectum3868794PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ganio, E, Altomare, D-F, Gabrielli, F, Milito, G, Canuti, S 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8866974PubMed Ganio, E, Altomare, D-F, Gabrielli, F, Milito, G, Canuti, S 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8866974PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hasse, C, Sitter, H, Brune, M, Wollenteit, I, Lorenz, W, Rothmund, M 2004Haemorrhoidectomy: conventional excision versus resection with the circular stapler. Prospective, randomized studyDtsch Med Wochenschr12916117PubMed Hasse, C, Sitter, H, Brune, M, Wollenteit, I, Lorenz, W, Rothmund, M 2004Haemorrhoidectomy: conventional excision versus resection with the circular stapler. Prospective, randomized studyDtsch Med Wochenschr12916117PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ho, Y-H, Cheong, W-K, Tsang, C, et al. 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy–cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum43166675PubMed Ho, Y-H, Cheong, W-K, Tsang, C,  et al. 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy–cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum43166675PubMed
7.
go back to reference Khalil, K-H, O’Bichere, A, Sellu, D 2000Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8713525PubMed Khalil, K-H, O’Bichere, A, Sellu, D 2000Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8713525PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kirsch, J-J, Staude, G, Herold, A 2001Hämorrhoidektomien nach Longo und Milligan-Morgan. Prospektive Vergleichsstudie mit 300 PatientenChirurg721805 Kirsch, J-J, Staude, G, Herold, A 2001Hämorrhoidektomien nach Longo und Milligan-Morgan. Prospektive Vergleichsstudie mit 300 PatientenChirurg721805
9.
go back to reference Rowsell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, D-M 2000Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet35577981PubMed Rowsell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, D-M 2000Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trialLancet35577981PubMed
10.
go back to reference Schmidt, MP, Fischbein, J, Shatavi, H 2002Stapler hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional procedures—a clinical studyZentralbl Chir127158PubMed Schmidt, MP, Fischbein, J, Shatavi, H 2002Stapler hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional procedures—a clinical studyZentralbl Chir127158PubMed
11.
go back to reference Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88104953PubMed Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88104953PubMed
12.
go back to reference Seow-Choen, F 2001Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gainBr J Surg8813 Seow-Choen, F 2001Stapled haemorrhoidectomy: pain or gainBr J Surg8813
13.
go back to reference Chung, YC, Wu, HJ 2003Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSureDis Colon Rectum468792CrossRefPubMed Chung, YC, Wu, HJ 2003Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSureDis Colon Rectum468792CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Franklin, EJ, Seetharam, S, Lowney, J, Horgan, PG 2003Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum4613803PubMed Franklin, EJ, Seetharam, S, Lowney, J, Horgan, PG 2003Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomyDis Colon Rectum4613803PubMed
15.
go back to reference Milito, G, Gargiani, M, Cortese, F 2002Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operationTech Coloproctol61715PubMed Milito, G, Gargiani, M, Cortese, F 2002Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operationTech Coloproctol61715PubMed
16.
go back to reference Thorbeck, CV, Montes, MF 2002Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure compared with Milligan-Morgan operationEur J Surg1684824PubMed Thorbeck, CV, Montes, MF 2002Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure compared with Milligan-Morgan operationEur J Surg1684824PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prospective, Randomized Study: Proximate® PPH Stapler vs. LigaSure™ for Hemorrhoidal Surgery
Authors
Matthias Kraemer, M.D.
Tengis Parulava, M.D.
Michael Roblick, M.D.
Lothar Duschka, M.D.
Heinrich Müller-Lobeck, M.D.
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0067-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 8/2005 Go to the issue

Letters to the Editor

The Authors Reply