Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2004

01-11-2004 | Original Contributions

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and One-Year Results

Authors: A. J. Senagore, M.D., M.S., M. Singer, M.D., H. Abcarian, M.D., J. Fleshman, M.D., M. Corman, M.D., S. Wexner, M.D., S. Nivatvongs, M.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 11/2004

Login to get access

PURPOSE

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the lesser degrees of pain with stapled hemorrhoidopexy, also called the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids. However, there have been few randomized comparisons assessing both perioperative and long-term outcomes of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Results are presented here from the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing these hemorrhoid procedures in the United States.

METHODS

Patients with prolapsing hemorrhoids (Grade III) were randomized to undergo the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons who had training in using the stapling technique. Primary end points were acute postoperative pain, and hemorrhoid symptom recurrence requiring additional treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 77; Ferguson, 79) completed randomization and the surgical procedure, 18 (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 12; Ferguson, 6) had significant protocol violations. One hundred seventeen patients (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 59; Ferguson, 58) returned for one-year follow-up. Demographic parameters, hemorrhoid symptoms, preoperative pain scores, and bowel habits were similar between groups. There were a similar number of patients with adverse events in each group (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 28 (36.4 percent) vs. Ferguson, 38 (48.1 percent); P = 0.138). Reoperation for an adverse effect was required in six (7.6 percent) Ferguson patients and in 0 patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (P = 0.028). Postoperative pain during the first 14 days, pain at first bowel movement, and need for postoperative analgesics were significantly less in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids group. Control of hemorrhoid symptoms was similar between groups; however, significantly fewer patients having the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids required additional anorectal procedures during one-year follow-up (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, 2 (2.6 percent), vs. Ferguson, 11 (13.9 percent); P = 0.01). Only four of the Ferguson patients (5 interventions) required additional procedures more than 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that stapled hemorrhoidopexy offers the benefits of less postoperative pain, less requirement for analgesics, and less pain at first bowel movement, while providing similar control of symptoms and need for additional hemorrhoid treatment at one-year follow-up from surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 3–6, 1998. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy, June 3–6, 1998.
2.
go back to reference Singer, MA, Cintron, JR, Fleshman, JW, et al. 2002Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United StatesDis Colon Rectum452607CrossRef Singer, MA, Cintron, JR, Fleshman, JW,  et al. 2002Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United StatesDis Colon Rectum452607CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brown, SR, Ballan, K, Ho, E, Ho Fams, YH, Seow-Choen, F 2001Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomyColorectal Dis31758CrossRefPubMed Brown, SR, Ballan, K, Ho, E, Ho Fams, YH, Seow-Choen, F 2001Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomyColorectal Dis31758CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cheetham, MJ, Cohen, CR, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2003A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-upDis Colon Rectum464917CrossRefPubMed Cheetham, MJ, Cohen, CR, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2003A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-upDis Colon Rectum464917CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Correa-Rovelo, JM, Tellez, O, Obregon, L, Miranda-Gomez, A, Moran, S 2002Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trialDis Colon Rectum45136775PubMed Correa-Rovelo, JM, Tellez, O, Obregon, L, Miranda-Gomez, A, Moran, S 2002Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trialDis Colon Rectum45136775PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ganio, E, Altomare, DF, Gabrielli, F, Milito, G, Canuti, S 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8866974CrossRefPubMed Ganio, E, Altomare, DF, Gabrielli, F, Milito, G, Canuti, S 2001Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg8866974CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hetzer, FH, Demartines, N, Handschin, AE, Clavien, PA 2002Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trialArch Surg13733340 Hetzer, FH, Demartines, N, Handschin, AE, Clavien, PA 2002Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trialArch Surg13733340
8.
go back to reference Ho, Y-H, Cheong, W-K, Tsang, C, Ho, J, Tang, C-L, Seow-Choen, F 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal monometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum43166675PubMed Ho, Y-H, Cheong, W-K, Tsang, C, Ho, J, Tang, C-L, Seow-Choen, F 2000Stapled hemorrhoidectomy – cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal monometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three monthsDis Colon Rectum43166675PubMed
9.
go back to reference Ho, YH, Tsang, C, Tang, CL, Nyam, D, Eu, KW, Seow-Choen, F 2000Anal sphinicter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometryDis Colon Rectum4316973PubMed Ho, YH, Tsang, C, Tang, CL, Nyam, D, Eu, KW, Seow-Choen, F 2000Anal sphinicter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometryDis Colon Rectum4316973PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kairaluoma, M, Nuorva, K, Kellokumpu, I 2003Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcomeDis Colon Rectum46939CrossRefPubMed Kairaluoma, M, Nuorva, K, Kellokumpu, I 2003Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcomeDis Colon Rectum46939CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Maw, A, Concepcion, R, Eu, KW, Seow-Choen, F, Heah, SM, Tang, CL, Tan, AL 2003Prospective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg902226CrossRefPubMed Maw, A, Concepcion, R, Eu, KW, Seow-Choen, F, Heah, SM, Tang, CL, Tan, AL 2003Prospective randomized study of bacteraemia in diathermy and stapled haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg902226CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mehigan, BJ, Monson, JR, Hartley, JE 2000Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trialLancet3557825CrossRefPubMed Mehigan, BJ, Monson, JR, Hartley, JE 2000Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trialLancet3557825CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ortiz, H, Marzo, J, Armendariz, P 2002Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg89137681CrossRefPubMed Ortiz, H, Marzo, J, Armendariz, P 2002Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg89137681CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Palimento, D, Picchio, M, Attanasio, U, Lombardi, A, Bambini, C, Renda, A 2003Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results.World J Surg272037PubMed Palimento, D, Picchio, M, Attanasio, U, Lombardi, A, Bambini, C, Renda, A 2003Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results.World J Surg272037PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pavlidis, T, Papaziogas, B, Souparis, A, Patsas, A, Koutelidakis, I, Papaziogas, T 2002Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trialInt J Colorectal Dis17503CrossRefPubMed Pavlidis, T, Papaziogas, B, Souparis, A, Patsas, A, Koutelidakis, I, Papaziogas, T 2002Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trialInt J Colorectal Dis17503CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Peng, BC, Jayne, DG, Ho, Y-H 2003Randomized trial of rubber band liagiton vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed pilesDis Colon Rectum462917CrossRefPubMed Peng, BC, Jayne, DG, Ho, Y-H 2003Randomized trial of rubber band liagiton vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed pilesDis Colon Rectum462917CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Roswell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, DM 2001Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trialLancet35577981CrossRef Roswell, M, Bello, M, Hemingway, DM 2001Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trialLancet35577981CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88104953CrossRefPubMed Shalaby, R, Desoky, A 2001Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomyBr J Surg88104953CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilson, MS, Pope, V, Doran, HE, Fearn, SJ, Brough, WA 2002Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trialDis Colon Rectum45143744PubMed Wilson, MS, Pope, V, Doran, HE, Fearn, SJ, Brough, WA 2002Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trialDis Colon Rectum45143744PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rockwood, TH, Church, JM, Fleshman, JW, et al. 2000Fecal Incontincence Quality of Life Scale: Quality of Life Instrument for Patients with Fecal IncontinenceDis Colon Rectum43917PubMed Rockwood, TH, Church, JM, Fleshman, JW,  et al. 2000Fecal Incontincence Quality of Life Scale: Quality of Life Instrument for Patients with Fecal IncontinenceDis Colon Rectum43917PubMed
21.
go back to reference Corman, ML 1998HemorrhoidsCorman, ML eds. Colon and rectal surgery4th edLippincott-RavenPhiladelphia147205 Corman, ML 1998HemorrhoidsCorman, ML eds. Colon and rectal surgery4th edLippincott-RavenPhiladelphia147205
22.
go back to reference Nivatvongs, S 1999HemorrhoidsGordon, PHNivatvongs, S eds. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus2nd edQuality Medical PublishingSt. Louis193215 Nivatvongs, S 1999HemorrhoidsGordon, PHNivatvongs, S eds. Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus2nd edQuality Medical PublishingSt. Louis193215
24.
go back to reference Molloy, RG, Kingsmore, D 2000Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomyLancet355810CrossRefPubMed Molloy, RG, Kingsmore, D 2000Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidectomyLancet355810CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Herold, A, Kirsch, JJ 2001Complications after circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy: results of an inquiry in GermanyColoproctology23816 Herold, A, Kirsch, JJ 2001Complications after circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy: results of an inquiry in GermanyColoproctology23816
26.
go back to reference Ripetti, V, Caricato, M, Arullani, A 2002Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure of prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerationsDis Colon Rectum4526870CrossRefPubMed Ripetti, V, Caricato, M, Arullani, A 2002Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure of prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerationsDis Colon Rectum4526870CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Cheetham, MJ, Mortensen, NJ, Nystom, PO, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2000Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomyLancet35673033CrossRefPubMed Cheetham, MJ, Mortensen, NJ, Nystom, PO, Kamm, MA, Phillips, RK 2000Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomyLancet35673033CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy: Perioperative and One-Year Results
Authors
A. J. Senagore, M.D., M.S.
M. Singer, M.D.
H. Abcarian, M.D.
J. Fleshman, M.D.
M. Corman, M.D.
S. Wexner, M.D.
S. Nivatvongs, M.D.
Publication date
01-11-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 11/2004
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0694-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2004

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2004 Go to the issue

Letters to the Editor

The Authors Reply